Jump to content

1964_2

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 1964_2

  1. 1964_2 replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Yep, spot on. Has hurt us all year, that the ā€œpremiershipā€ team couldnā€™t create an environment that helps us win games. Just a run of the mill club rather than a Ess, Coll, Carl etc
  2. 1964_2 replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Haha face palm away palā€¦..read your last 10 posts. Not accepting reality clearly!!! we had a final won, and buddy faking a 50 actually turned the game. Nothing more, nothing less. Accept reality. Not a dynasty team. Just a team that won 1 flag, and didnā€™t have what it takes to accept a tiny bit of adversity and back in a plan to get things back on track. Truth hurts peeps!
  3. 1964_2 replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Agree. Weaker team, who played as a better team won, but [censored] me, the weapons we had on our side and wasted, itā€™s hard not to put it down to own goals as to why we lost. Largely strategy based, as to how a weaker team got the points.
  4. 1964_2 replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Can sum it up for you very simply. The better team lost. Absolutely 1000% out-coached, if you canā€™t see that yet, you will work it out in coming days
  5. 1964_2 replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Terribly take from someone who canā€™t cop being spanked by a better team / coach
  6. 1964_2 replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    SIMON simply does not have the answers despite having the best cattle at his disposal !!!!
  7. 1964_2 replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Will dumb it down for everyone. Weaker team won. Why? Better coach, coaching panel delivered on their plan. We canā€™t afford for Adem to go!!
  8. How good was Sandra Sully in her prime..Sorry wrong thread :)
  9. Donā€™t disagree with you Kent. But the fact that to date he hasnā€™t signed up to a premiership team who is well placed to go back to back, is more to do with the potential $$ on offer, rather than any desperate need to go home, in my humble opinion.
  10. Only thing that makes sense to me, is LJ has been enticed by the big $$, and using the ā€œgo homeā€ factor as a convenient excuse
  11. Mo, seriously, give it a spell. Your views are incorrect
  12. Mo you seam to be a real Debby downer, any chance of some positivity? Life is not that hard as a supporter of the reigning premiers, who just finished 2nd is it?
  13. Love the pic adonski. Conditional on him being fit, and the filth paying a decent % of his wage Gawndy is growing on me!
  14. Would be epic. And potentially make the news overseas given how successful a movie ā€œwolf of Wall Streetā€ is/was. Regarding the sore chest, top of the stomach does the trick.
  15. 1964_2 replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Mayā€™s cunning plan to fire up Melk as a match winner got him into the AA
  16. 1964_2 replied to Vipercrunch's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Who was it?
  17. 1964_2 replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Absolute stitch-up. The good news is we play better when challenged rather than receiving pats on the back. A few stolen awards tonight, only assists our finals campaign
  18. Fantastic leadership and culture, if the players know this, have accepted it, and have a mindset of ā€œletā€™s enjoy our last month or so togetherā€ His performance against the lions displayed evidence that we should get the best out of him, if he only has a few weeks left as a demon - a credit to Jacko himself, his teammates, and the culture of everyone involved.
  19. 1964_2 replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    The right outcome though. Clarry has been a more reliable, consistent performer than Trac during the H&A. Let Trac focus on the big finals and Norm
  20. I am noT $&@@&ng leaving !!
  21. No. Just no. You obviously didnā€™t watch last weeks vfl. That was like a final for him (2nd last chance to show form and get picked for finals), and he delivered 6 possessions, 2 points, 2 marks. Completely mentally shot unfortunately and sadly.
  22. Will go something like this
  23. 1964_2 replied to Sir Why You Little's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Ess - 15th (and club falling apart) Eagles - 17th Lions - 4th pre game, 6th after. Really donā€™t think you can compare Melbā€™s finish to Geel/Rich given the relative positions of the opponents. There is not too many top 4/6 teams that donā€™t come up with some sort of response after a 66 point half time deficit.
  24. 1964_2 replied to layzie's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Yes, see above. Has been revised to 10 goals up, with 2 mins to go.
  25. Given it was the week before finals, and we most likely had top 4 sorted, I actually think we didnā€™t really well to maintain most of the half time lead in the 2nd half. Would be different if playing a bottom 4 team, but need to remember just how extraordinary a 66 point half time lead is against a top 6 team.