Everything posted by BoBo
- GAMEDAY: Rd 15 vs Geelong
- GAMEDAY: Rd 15 vs Geelong
- GAMEDAY: Rd 15 vs Geelong
- GAMEDAY: Rd 15 vs Geelong
- GAMEDAY: Rd 15 vs Geelong
- MRP & MRO Fiasco
-
Hawks racism allegations (merged thread)
Huh, interesting. Clarkson leaves the game on mental health issues a couple of weeks before the investigatory panel is finished, then once it’s finished, a week later he’s in the fold to come back.
- POSTGAME: Rd 12 vs Carlton
- POSTGAME: Rd 12 vs Carlton
- GAMEDAY: Rd 12 vs Carlton
- GAMEDAY: Rd 12 vs Carlton
- GAMEDAY: Rd 12 vs Carlton
- GAMEDAY: Rd 12 vs Carlton
- GAMEDAY: Rd 12 vs Carlton
-
Hawks racism allegations (merged thread)
Yeah but this isn't a rule that people follow consistently. Literally NOBODY actually holds the standard of 'accusations are only accusations' in all situations. People will sway one way or the other given the information they have available to them at the time. To hold this as a standard across all situations will take you into places you don't want to go.
-
Hawks racism allegations (merged thread)
Yes you agree with me then. The process has been abandoned before it's completion and therefore the statement is one that is implicitly saying there is nothing provable nor is there anything exculpatory for the panel to express. Hence why I said, nothing is proven or disproven and we are at the exact same stage last year when the panel was created in the first place. Some people are misunderstanding this situation to mean 'the allegations are not true', which, isn't the case. (For what it's worth, there are high profile cases where accusations are rightly treated as substantive. I'm NOT saying that applies in this case, but that sentiment is not a consistent truism. Again, not saying that applies here.)
-
Hawks racism allegations (merged thread)
Given the panel was there to advise the AFL and because the panel investigation did not conclude in its process, but was agreed by the complainants to end the process, then that is for Gil to announce. The core line that Gil said that jumped out at me was ‘No adverse findings have been made’ His announcement would have been combed over by lawyers so the specific language that ‘no adverse findings have been made’ suggests that the investigation is halted before it could complete its work (from all the reasons you mentioned). He didn’t say ‘no adverse findings have been established’ or ‘there are no adverse findings at the conclusion of the investigation’. Instead the statement is: the panel is not stating any adverse findings. So essentially we are at the exact same place we were last year when the panel was announced that nothing has been proved or disproved.
-
Show Me The Puppy!
He looks like a very good boy.
-
Media Watch 2023
Good call. I also think King is annoying… but credit where credit is due, he has taught me things about how team game plans work that I haven’t seen anywhere else. He does put the work in and it shows.
-
PREGAME: Rd 09 vs Hawthorn
I’ll be wrapped if he doesn’t get a week. On replay, he looks at the ball, then the player, then back at the ball, then back at the player once he makes contact. That alone is a sanction at least or more probable, a week off. If he kept his eyes on the ball the whole time, wouldn’t be a problem. Ideally, if he spun around at the last second to pretend to mark it and landed on the player, that wouldn’t be an issue either.
- POSTGAME: Rd 08 vs Gold Coast
-
The Melbourne Mindset - Garry Lyon interview with Max Gawn.
I’d love this. Especially grand final day video recordings of the bench and coaches box. Lock it away for a decade or two (or three) and release it in full. Would be incredible to see how the whole process works whilst watching the game.
-
Media Watch 2023
On the couch is the best of all the AFL media shows. That is all.
- POSTGAME: Rd 07 vs North Melbourne
-
Kozzy Pickett Re-Signs for 4 Years
Nah, his other mate https://www.zerohanger.com/fremantle-forward-liam-henry-linked-to-melbourne-amid-kysaiah-pickett-trade-speculation-132578/amp/