Jump to content

Colm

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Colm

  1. Colm replied to WERRIDEE's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Interesting that you have us taking two endurance runners who will probably play wing. We just trade hunter to play on wing and we have JJ, Gus and Langdon who can play there. Have you just gone for what you think is best available at both of our picks? Agree we would pick Hollands if he was still there at 13
  2. Colm replied to WERRIDEE's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Yes but know their luck he will request to be trade there in 2 years and they will end up with 2 top 10 picks from this draft.
  3. After a season where we virtually give no new young talent games we simple have to next year. The problem is that few were banging the door down to get a game. I only watch half a dozen Casey games this year and kept a close eye on Laurie, JVR and Howes as they were our higher picks. Laurie was the pick after Bowey and JT raved about both of them at the time. We could do we his quality kicking too but I didn’t see him put in one game where he played well in 4 quarters at VFL level. JVR looks good and should get games but people need to lower their expectations of him for next year I think. Howes looked ok in patches and hopefully will benefit from another preseason. Really hope that an extra preseason sees a big improvement in some of our younger players and that we bring in a couple through the draft that will be able to make an impact next season.
  4. Colm replied to Lucifers Hero's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Do you know if there’s greater depth next year as well as better top end talent?
  5. Colm replied to Lucifers Hero's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    God I hope WC get picks 8&12. I think that would swing the balance back in our favour. If Freo don’t up their offer I’d take pick 8 and a seal of future first. It’s still unders but at least we get high end talent.
  6. Colm replied to Lucifers Hero's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Does anybody know what the rules if we go past the deadline and don’t get a deal done? Can he resign with us at that stage? Or does he automatically go to the PSD?
  7. If we do that the pies will want 19 for Grundy
  8. Colm replied to Lucifers Hero's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Seems fair but I think Geelong want to hold onto pick 7 for Jhye Clarke which would mean they could be bringing in 4(that’s right 4) first round draft picks this year. WTF
  9. Colm replied to Lucifers Hero's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I agree that’s Freos first from this year and next along with Norths F2nd will get the deal done and I’ll be happy bough with that. I do however expect us to trade the two future first to improve our draft hand this year. Looks like we will only bring Grundy in this trade window and as Lamb said we are in a “win now” phase. Would be better to get quality players out of this draft and get games into them. I know next years draft is a stronger draft but we have shown in the past few years we would rather get players in a year earlier. If we can still keep some good picks in the second round of next years draft I’m sure JT will get some good talent out of it. Also I think that next years draft being stronger will make it easier to trade into this one.
  10. Colm replied to Lucifers Hero's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Just been reported on Trade Radio that Freo want a pick between 15-22 for Lobb. They are waiting for the Dunkley deal to be done first.
  11. Colm replied to Lucifers Hero's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    It’s just the same thing Carlton did with Martin a few years ago. $1.5m would only be in the first year.
  12. Colm replied to Lucifers Hero's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I thought this at first too but they aren’t even offering what they have at the minute in terms of a future second rounder. #Bellend
  13. I know what your saying DD and I still can’t understand how Geelong had the cap space to buy pick 7. You have to hand it to them their list management is the best in the game. At the start of the trade period I was very disheartened to see what our rivals are able to do in terms of bringing in players that are ready to go and will improve their list straight away and the only player we seem to be in for is Grundy. But having listened to Lambs interviews I’m of the opinion that if we don’t trade in any other player in this window we will do very well out of this draft and bring in at least 2 high quality players that should be ready to go next year. I think we will add our future first to the bounty we get from Freo and hit this draft much the same as when we picked up Jackson, Koissie and Rivers. Just saying wait until after trade window and draft are done and dusted and then judge our off season compared to others.
  14. Colm replied to Lucifers Hero's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Not bad LN but I don’t think we need to send a pick to Freo in the first part of the deal, also don’t think we would trade back down from 7 if we were to get it.
  15. Colm replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I think the Bedford trade might have to wait a little while. Don’t think we will pull the trigger on it until after the Grundy deal and perhaps not until after the Hopper deal. Im hoping that we end up with Grundy and pick 30 and maybe trade out a future 3rd. Would be great bit of business and very possible.
  16. Colm replied to Ouch!'s post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I’d be surprised if that was the case LH. Pies have asked for a pick inside top 25. We are very close with 27. If we add the Bedford pick then we are going way over their asking price.
  17. If we are only using 2 picks I would think they will be very high picks. I expect us to be aggressive in trying to get our trading done early to give us the best possible chance of moving up the board. I wonder if the JHF to Port has made it more urgent to get our deals done. I assume North will want at least one pick at the very pointing end of this years draft to be part of the deal. Given how difficult top 7 picks are to trade for JHF trade could make the market a lot more competitive.
  18. Given the amount of players they are losing Freo will have to keep some picks to fill spots on their list.
  19. Colm replied to Lucifers Hero's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Think we will get Grundy over the line for whatever we get for Bedford and pick 32.
  20. Colm replied to Lucifers Hero's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Added to the offer they have already made I think this future second gets it done. We would like more but I feel that’s enough to get the deal done.
  21. Colm replied to Lucifers Hero's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Freo have received a future 2nd &3rd from North for Logue and Tucker. Gives them more draft capital to get Jackson.
  22. Colm replied to Lucifers Hero's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Any posters who study the draft closely have any info on Cambell Chesser? I wonder if West Coast are in for Jackson if it’s someone we might enquire about. He’s been injured this year. I remember a lot of posters thought we would pick him with our first pick last year but I think WC picked him a few picks in front of us. Rookie me central says he’s strengths are +Speed, kicking, Class, Versatility, Outside run, Breaking lines. Sounds perfect for us and from Victoria too.
  23. Great interview. Sounds like West Coast are going to put an offer in for Jackson in coming days. Freo have offered this years first and next years. We have knocked that back. Harmes is going nowhere. Happy for Hunt to go. Same if Tommo can find another club. Club wants more than Pick 43 for Bedford.
  24. Colm replied to Lucifers Hero's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    If Freo are offering this years first along with next years at this stage of the negotiation then you would assume they will go further. Assume they get norths future second. In a strong draft that future second is a good pick. Probably as good or better than a late first round this year. It would be enough to get the deal done imo. Sure we want a top 10 pick but we are the masters of moving up the board so perhaps it’s best to get the picks freo are offering ( plus a future second of north) and move il ourselves. We may be eyeing a top 5 pick and it may make more sense to get the Jackson deal done now so we can try and move up the board before others start swapping picks.
  25. Colm replied to Ouch!'s post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    This is a point I think is being over looked. It’s a bad contract in terms of cost but also because of its length. IF the pies pay $300k-$350k then that probably means we are paying him correct market value or there abouts. But if he wasn’t already locked in for 5 years then I can’t see us offer him a contract that long. Considering he’s just coming of a couple of injuries we are taking a gamble offering 5 years. That needs to be reflected in the trade value.