-
Posts
6,853 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
45
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Everything posted by Lord Nev
-
Pick 27 and a future 3rd (which would be say pick 50) = Pick 19 points wise. Reckon that's a fair deal for Grundy. Fingers crossed.
-
Perhaps 27 and a future 3rd?
-
-
-
-
-
100%. Also got the feeling I wouldn't like to be on the opposite side of the table to Sergeant Lamb!
-
'Blake Howes was on the verge of selection before his injury' Telling you. One to watch next year.
- 48 replies
-
- 14
-
Speaking to media on Monday, Power stated Hunter is expected to remain at Whitten Oval for 2023. "Lachie is contracted for another few years and he hasn't requested a trade," Power said. "We expect him to be at the Bulldogs next year." Bulldogs provide clarity on winger Lachie Hunter, free agent Zaine Cordy: AFL trade news
-
Absolutely, we'd have to have very low expectations. I'd just see him as a younger Mitch Brown. Will be good for Casey, might play an AFL game or two, but that would be about it.
-
Haven't followed him closely, but he's definitely more of a swingman now. In saying that, finished the year off in the VFL with a few big bags of goals.
-
Fair call, BUT if they did pull the trigger on Petty forward and JVR comes in too then all of a sudden we have a couple of absolute mongrels inside 50.
-
If Schache came in to fill the depth spot left by Mitch Brown then I don't absolutely hate it tbh. He'd come in on minimum chips and would expect to play mostly VFL IMO. They can't all be zingers...
-
Didn't hear Lyon's comments so not sure exactly what he said, but Harmes has spoken with Essendon. Don't know how much chance to move, but he has 100% spoken to them.
-
Seem to remember WC talking about the possibility of splitting that pick 2 though. In saying that, a deal will somehow happen with Freo, and I think Lobb will get traded - This is Ding Dong Bell we're dealing with remember? The same bloke who 'walked away' from Hogan negotiations.
-
Dunstan is already on our list. He doesn't need to 'come into Harmes' spot' on the list. No context change needed, just some hand holding and walking through apparently.
-
No, you just jumped into a conversation late and misunderstood it. Have a good one.
-
You were looking at a later post mate. This is the original one here.
-
Just to clarify, I was responding originally to SWYL who was suggesting Dunstan come into the team for Harmes role. This is a different conversation to the dynamics of list management.
-
Nah. Dunstan is just a slower and less versatile Harmes, and doesn't fit with our midfield mix at all IMO. Good depth though.
-
Yes, Dunstan is very good depth, but he doesn't have the burst or running ability that Harmes does and we need more of that. Dunstan will only get a game if we have injuries. I do expect a bit of a different side, and I'm excited to see JVR, Howes, Laurie get a crack on top of the potential ins in Grundy, Hunter, maybe we could even have a dip at Bowes if Harmes leaves? I can see us bringing in a few more younger players this year.
-
Not that I rate Harmes super highly, but Dunstan in for Harmes doesn't improve us.