Jump to content

adonski

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by adonski

  1. Happy days if true. Can't believe some people are on the fence about this. If he was coming this time last year we'd all be doing cartwheels. I get there seems something odd about him being traded for only a 2nd rounder, but we don't usually like touching damaged goods so I might just put this one down to Norf's incompetence.
  2. It was mentioned we'd try to get rid of T Mac to ensure we could meet rivals contract offers for Brown. We must have a decent portion allocated to Brown regardless of the T Mac situation, however would prefer Tom to go to allow us to match something we haven't budgeted for is the way I read into it. Long story short, it would appear we do have a fair chunk of cash in the cap regardless.
  3. Judging by his highlights. He plays very similar to his brother, but at AFL level will be more suited to the wing given he's smaller, FWIW. Looks to be able to break the lines.
  4. More likely to be Preuss & 2021 first rounder
  5. adonski replied to RedFox's topic in Melbourne Demons
    Reckon Crouch is one of those guys who is a good player, looks good of paper, but makes your team no better
  6. Dogs have trialed it with Dunkley but it might actually work with Jackson
  7. Will rotate between half forward, full forward, wing and inside mid!
  8. Think we might be idiots if we took Blakely too! ?
  9. You have NFI if you’re comparing Ben Brown and Sava
  10. Low footy IQ, can't mark
  11. Langdon & Salem not polling a single vote is interesting
  12. And how do the coaches respond to that mentality
  13. King, Membrey, Marshall, Ryder & now Brown? Surely not.
  14. Budget Stephenson without the Sportsbet account -
  15. He couldn't threaten to leave the league should he poll too few could he?
  16. adonski replied to Elegt's topic in Melbourne Demons
    Any more goss?
  17. I'd want Whitfield out of that deal.
  18. Welcome to Melbourne FC: Tim Taranto
  19. adonski replied to Elegt's topic in Melbourne Demons
    Inside mid - tick Butcher - tick Would have to give up first rounder - tick Sign me up
  20. I'm always pro getting a player for 'free'
  21. Hunt for one of those vacant spots...
  22. That may be fair enough, but why isn't he in conversions with Geelong, or Richmond? I don't really understand how Carlton have come into the equation, it'd be the definition of a sideways trade.