Superunknown
Members
-
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Superunknown
-
Difficult but it can’t be excluded he didn’t need to put his hands out as he turned to bump -
The biomechanist’s evidence is going to exclude any consideration of him deliberately turning to bump this whole thing is going to turn on his decision making and his failure to take a safer path I have a bad feeling about this I hope we anticipated this and have someone to provide opposing position
-
Why would he retract it? Bit of honesty in this world would be super (and currently unknown!)
-
Leaving aside the weirdness, tell me Member Demonland, when will Player Maynard front the Tribunal. Is it Weekday Tuesday of Date 12 of Month September in This Year of our Lord 2023?
-
That is energy sapping and distracting for them
-
What compromise is there? It’s not some political legislation negotiation. That’s bizarre.
-
If it’s true Dillon, Gillon and Kane all stepped in then I think Christian’s position is untenable. Or, he may find he has some co-MROs next year. Good to see current coaches infer Maynard did the wrong thing - the comparison with what he’d do at training, is very important in the context of protecting the potential victim. I am feeling more confident he’ll get at least a few weeks
-
He is a dirty, dirty player. If boggles my mind we don’t call it out or deal with it directly with Collingwood.
-
-
Woweeee Whomever is running PR for Collingwood has a gig at Qantas!
-
Is there a more hateable duo than Cox and Maynard? Post responses to: Dislikeable Duo C/- Collingwood Neanderthal Holding Pen AAMI Park melbourne
-
Why didn’t she just not wear a Handmaids Tale outfit before going out that night? Why did she dress like that victim blaming
-
Trolling
-
One thing is for sure, the page count here is really going to blow put
-
-
-
Based on that - gone for 3 at least. I still think Kane’s intervention is a portent of grim tidings for Maynard.
-
Hope the afl uses this as the basis of their case
-
-
I wish the board would issue a statement calling the obvious media bias into account then being very direct and forceful with the AFL regarding same. I still think Kane’s intervention is a grim portent for Maynard. If he gets off or a very light sentence, the AFL can appeal it, and we should insist we have input into that. I think everyone thinks we’re the good corporate citizen and have a soft underbelly. It’d be good to disabuse them of that perception I also tnink we need to seed some stories into the media widening the Overton window on this. “Melbourne insiders not authorised to speak on the record claim the club is looking for a 6 month suspension for Maynard given what looks like a deliberate attempt to hurt brayshaw. Etc etc”
-
-
I wish the board would issue a statement calling the obvious media bias into account then being very direct and forceful with the AFL regarding same. I still think Kane’s intervention is a grim portent for Maynard. If he gets off or a very light sentence, the AFL can appeal it, and we should insist we have input into that. I think everyone thinks we’re the good corporate citizen and have a soft underbelly. It’d be good to disabuse them of that perception
-
Look I’d like to disagree but can’t. Remember the hits on Geelong in the 21 prelim? Where’s that nastiness? If by some miracle - and it will take some doing - we meet them, there should be a team mantra of taking him out, with a footy action.
-
-
Another commenter here said to me that whilst the players love Goodwin they wouldn’t run through a wall for each other. He said Stinnear has that with the women’s team. It’s been like this with Melb for as long as I can remember. Where’s the buy in for each other? The brayshaw injury exemplifies this as noted by others above . It’s really odd.
