Jump to content

Superunknown

Members

Everything posted by Superunknown

  1. According to the stats and endless punditry, he is an F minus where he is at present. A B grader seems a substantial upgrade.
  2. Wouldn’t it be sensible to play him back into form right back where he belongs, where the Lever flies, over mountains high. Or VFL and then back to seniors.
  3. I’m interested in why you’ve parlayed a female president into wokeness (whatever that means). I’m not sure I can see the correlation - could you expand?
  4. Could I get a power play odds boost multi on all of the above please? Brought to you by Gillon’s fabulous gambling emporium, GilCorpBet
  5. This isn’t angsty enough to be the Angst du Jour yet, and it’s certainly not zeitgeisty enough
  6. According to something I saw from the Hun or Domainfax there was rival interest? Anyone from whom?
  7. I’ve already contacted the ACCC - false advertising ! 🕵🏻😂
  8. Nothing to proffer - I may have been being a teensy, weensy, little bit facetitious. It’s all getting rather tedious, but at the same time comically ridiculous.
  9. It’s exhilarating pondering what topic will arise as our next angst du jour this season.
  10. Good! The pay sucked and the boss was a monster!
  11. No not you, your pseudonym, silly! She’s as old as the hills!
  12. “Swan is a terrible human, they’ve a thug who put one of our players out of the game with brain damage and then made it seem like the victim’s fault and are penalising us for it so thanks no thanks we’re not AFL flunkies” official Demons press release
  13. Gee @WalkingCivilWar ‘s memoirs are going to be a must-read. Published under a spectacularly inventive nom de plume of course. Demons of the Demons, by Lady Crysanthenum Thistlethwaite.0
  14. Jesus this league, it’s clown shoes stuff and we’re being blamed Roffey and pert should be all over this including the media.
  15. Zero expectations now except for hopefully Rory winning tomorrow. I’d like a strict rule of rewarding VFL form and not rewarding poor AFL form. The strategic imperative should be a focus on who can cut the mustard in 25/26 (leveraging Max, CP5, May, Lever, Oliver etc ) whilst turning one’s mind to what lies beyond 26. If this results in a dip down and high picks (waves at 2019), then so be it.
  16. I agree we need a new policy - a 50% DH policy ! 👀👀🕵🏻🕵🏻✅✅
  17. At $5.50, north seem like crazy value
  18. Bloody legend of the game loved watching him
  19. Paging @Brownie re his post Gus marketing team anecdote
  20. One of my favourites, that one. Kim is the boss.
  21. 100990090000000 x this ^^ put another way - had this been a hit by Green(T)/ take your pick on Daicos with similar outcome it’d have been 8 weeks anyone thinking this was not a Collingwood protection racket event by the AFL needs to think harder again, our club absolutely [censored] the bed on the PR side by not having Roffey or pert right behind Daicos and Maynard at quarter time to get on the record with channel 7 about our expectations for the length of suspension for what was clearly a reckless and avoidable act I’ll never forget that
  22. Whateley: confected inanity to feed the AFL media cycle. unlike meadow lea, he ought not be congratulated
  23. He should receive an official warning and the AFL should issue guidance. If they’re serious about protecting Melbourne and other players of course.
  24. You must be terribly omnipotent to be able to make these calls without knowing anything about someone - whether they live within 2000km of Melbourne, their financial position and so on. I don’t envy you - it must be a terrible burden carrying that knowledge and also odiousness