Swooper1987

He was a very good player too. I wonder how much of a difference he and Lyon would've made in the 87 prelim? Chris did his knee in round 5 at Carrara and then of course everyone knows about the famous Lyon stretcher incident in round 22 when he broke his leg early in the game at the Western Oval.

The post match pressers are usually indicative. Simpson was very bullish about Yeo and Naitanui. Goodwin equally effusive about Jackson. Goodwin also made mention of our third quarter dominance which by extension means Naitanui wouldn't have been in his consideration given he got exactly zero disposals in that quarter - the match deciding quarter as it turned out to be. Redden and Kelly were the best four quarter eagles in my view. It makes no sense that Goody would've given 4 to Jacko and 1 to Naitanui given they played on each other for a big chunk of the night.

Bizarre. Only Goodwin voted for Jackson, and how Simpson voted for Naitanui's 5 minute burst is beyond belief. Simpson's judgement with his voting is reflective of his current coaching performance.

Love these votes from Michael Lynch in The Age. Great to see a couple of unsung heroes recognized for their performance. VOTES Ben Brown (Melbourne) 8 Tim Kelly (West Coast) 7 James Harmes (Melbourne) 7 Alex Neal-Bullen (Melbourne) 7 Jake Bowey (Melbourne) 6

I've been listening to the summary of the last 15 minutes - how the WC big dogs got them back into the game. Isn't that the major problem with them? In the third quarter, when the game was essentially won, Gawn smashed NicNat. NN didn't trouble the statisticians for the quarter in terms of disposals, whereas Gawn was dancing around like a ruck rover. Some of his field kicking (including on the left) was amazing. Same with Yeo - a great last quarter no doubt, but again only when there was nothing to lose. No doubt we'll hear from Gerard Healy about how great they are but in reality they are generally a lazy, conditional footy team. I can't see them making finals now and had we not had the interruption last night, we win that game very comfortably.

Couldn't agree more. But they are also the most "honest" side. They'll beat pretty much everyone below them and lose to anyone above them. It's that consistency that has them where they are.

I've said it before but I think Gawn is criminally underrated by a lot of posters here and media elsewhere. He played a fantastic ruckman's game, got the ball moving in our direction (31 hitouts 42% to advantage), kicks a couple of goals, goes at 69% DE and has 11 score involvements (second highest for us). Lyon says on the telecast that Gawn has been quiet - Fox Footy group think takes hold, the media who aren't at the game but listen to Lyon's commentary all fall for it. Only the HS listed Gawn in the best players. Nothing in the Age for Max, nor AFL.com.au. He was statistically better than any other ruckman this week in nearly all categories. Both coaches rate him the third best player on the ground. The coaches clearly didn't listen to the commentary team. It never ceases to amaze me how frequently wrong the "experts" are.

Let's just shore up a top 4 spot first before we entertain where it's played.

Irrespective of what happens from now, this is our most successful Home and Away season in terms of premiership points since 1990 when we won 16 games. 14.5 wins is better than any season since, and that includes our GF season of 2000 (14 wins) and our preliminary final seasons of 1994 (12), 1998 (14) and 2018 (14). Let's hope we can beat the 16 of 1990 and secure top 4.

Too hard this week. About 15 genuine contenders. Like the under 11's - a good team effort

Gawn's DE has dropped since he has focused more on winning clearance himself. His grabs out of the ruck contest and throwing it on to the boot to move the ball forward are almost never going to be "efficient" under the stats definition. Also, it is much easier to be efficient if you handball more. Max is one of the few rucks who kicks more often than handballs.

Was just a statement of fact Mono, not a wish!

Well the good news out of today is that it's now not possible for the Demons to finish lower than 6th.

Is it official?

Agreed, but they did host the Tigers there a few weeks back so it's not an unfamiliar scenario for them.

Good summary, but Trac has trailed off a bit I think. I'm not sure if it's the return of Viney unbalancing things a bit, but other than his Port game, he's been only average in the last few games. We need more from him. He needs to spend more time forward and Gawn more time in that centre back role he plays so well. Oliver is having a great season and at the moment probably only he and Lever are operating at optimum level.

From Peter Ryan's 4 Points in today's Age. GOING NOT GAWN Melbourne’s Max Gawn remains in form but with Luke Jackson battling and the midfield disconnected from their bearded skipper the area needs a freshen up. Between rounds 1-12 Melbourne were ranked eighth in clearance differential and sixth in the scores from stoppages differential. Since round 13 they are 15th for clearance differential and 13th in the scores from stoppages differential. They can’t ignore the issue.

Too much common sense here Titan. We've also not lost any match by more than 20 points for the season and in all bar the Collingwood game we've had more or the same scoring shots than the opposition. I'm still a believer.

I think we'll do ok. 3 out of the last 4 is definitely achievable but even if it isn't to be others still need to pass us so there is a lot to play out. Ignore the media analysis - it changes nearly by the minute. Just take it game by game and trust in the method that has us in such a good position this late in the season. We haven't been beaten by more than 20 points in any game this season and we have had more or at least the same scoring shots in every game bar one (Collingwood). We are right in this. This is a different Melbourne team to those we've seen before. Is there room to improve? Absolutely. I'm confident we will.

I think Gawn's efficiency last night was impacted by the way he got his possessions. Lot's of kicks out of the ruck. He barely handballed (2 for the game). It's much easier to have a higher efficiency when you handball more, even though it often puts team mates under pressure. His DE has been pretty good most of the year.

Great perspective Dr. G. It was a decent game where we fell short. The reasons were obvious and Bontempelli is a star. When we meet them again we need to put more work into curbing him.

My advice - steer clear of ladder predictors! Forecasting results in this competition, at this time of year, up to 4 weeks ahead is impossible. Injuries, suspension, covid complications. Just take it one week at a time. We control our own destiny. After this round at worst we are third (hopefully the Tigers can get up today). If we win next week we won't be below third.

First I heard about loads was back in the late 90's when Neil Craig was the fitness guy for Malcolm Blight at the Crows. It seemed to work for them. They'd have an average finish to the season and then blitz finals.

Jackson for Weid is a no brainer, especially if the fixture doesn't change. I think we need Melksham and I reckon Jones might get another go. Probably Harmes and maybe a rest for Jordon.

Thought we were pretty good tonight. They were just a little better and they had Bontempelli who made our mids look silly in the last quarter. The umpiring - meh . Our inability to convert pretty straightforward opportunities was more of an issue. Well done to Oliver and Gawn who had good connection tonight. Lever was really solid. If we can make top 4 we are still a real shot. Our challenge is to win three out of the last four to make sure of it.