Jump to content

titan_uranus

Life Member
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by titan_uranus

  1. It 100% wasn’t touched. The angle which looks like his hand touches it is misleading because when you match it up with the side-on angle, the ball is past his hand. He didn’t touch it. It’s eminently arguable we’ve lost a game due to an egregious ARC error. It’s also eminently arguable that we lost because we weren’t good enough for long enough. Smashed at stoppages by a side missing three starting mids. 5 goals from 31 inside 50s in the second half. A number of complete passengers. It’s an easy conclusion to make after one game (and a loss to boot) but I don’t think Grundy forward is going to win us the flag. It just didn’t look right.
  2. I'll fall off my chair if they lose to St Kilda or the Dogs at home. But if they lose even a single game, finals are highly likely over for them. 11.5 won't cut it. They have no choice but to go 2-0.
  3. If Geelong go 2-0 from here they get to 12.5. That means the likes of GWS, St Kilda and the Dogs need to win 2 more games to stay in front of them. Carlton might only need 1 win if they can somehow get their percentage in front. So for St Kilda, factoring in a loss to Geelong, they have to beat Brisbane in Brisbane along with Richmond. Unlikely. That would see Geelong pass St Kilda, which right now is enough to make finals unless a side below them passes them. For sides below them, they all would have to go 3-0 to pass Geelong on 12.5. That requires Sydney to, for example, beat Adelaide in Adelaide and us. Or requires Adelaide to beat Brisbane in Brisbane and Sydney at home. Or requires Essendon to beat North, GWS (away) and Collingwood. So, in short, unless you think Geelong is going to lose to St Kilda or the Dogs at home, they're still odds on to make finals. Sadly.
  4. I’ve noticed the words ā€œcontest and defenceā€ have been said by multiple players this week. Was clearly a theme with Goodwin/the coaches.
  5. Carlton had lost their last 4 and looked awful going into that game. Now that they’re good and it’s their home game, the crowd should be much bigger.
  6. titan_uranus replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I think you mean you couldn’t care less. I’m not sure if ignoring the journos would have helped. After what he copped for the argument with the doctor, imagine if he did a ā€œno commentā€ or acted like he didn’t want to talk. Just as bad, if not worse.
  7. Except for when we lose, in which case it’s a land of lava, pain and where you can’t say anything positive lest you be called a ā€œhappy clapperā€.
  8. I agree with you that Carlton are being seriously underrated on here. But I don’t agree with everything in this post. St Kilda’s been out of form since the bye and they struggled to get separation against them for 2.5 quarters. The Saints’ defensive ranking stems from their pre-bye form (North scored 34 and the Dogs 41 which skews their points against total a bit too). Jack Steele’s 2023 form is a shadow of his 2020-22 form, too. And I don’t think Tom De Koning is ā€œsmashingā€ into anyone (North played two much bigger rucks this weekend and Gawn had no issues from a physicality perspective). Clearly though they play a brand of football that stacks up. They have talent on every line and as you say, McKay out has forced them to think about their forward line (a bit like Fristch out for us I think) and they’re finding new ways to score. My principal concern is their backline - we have to neutralise the air and without Petty, I fear that is going to be a big task.
  9. titan_uranus replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    My thoughts precisely. I saw the posts here and braced myself for some sort of bombshell. It was just standard Clayton Oliver. He’s flat when he talks and he’s clearly jaded by how many times he’s had to press for fitness that he’s almost joking about it.
  10. Well we know it won’t be Brown or TMac replacing Petty. I think it’ll be Smith, with Hibberd or Tomlinson into the backline.
  11. titan_uranus replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Close. Away games to GWS at Manuka: Western Bulldogs - 7 Melbourne - 4 Gold Coast - 4 Port Adelaide - 3 Fremantle - 3 Geelong - 3 St Kilda - 3 Brisbane - 2 Hawthorn - 1 North Melbourne - 1 Adelaide - 1 Richmond - 1 Carlton - 0 Collingwood - 0 Essendon - 0 Sydney - 0 West Coast - 0
  12. titan_uranus replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Games at Blundstone since 2012 (when North started playing home games there): GWS - 6 Melbourne - 5 Adelaide - 3 St Kilda - 3 Sydney - 3 West Coast - 3 Port Adelaide - 3 Geelong - 2 Richmond - 2 Gold Coast - 1 (will be 2 by the end of this year) Hawthorn - 1 Brisbane - 1 Carlton - 1 Collingwood - 0 Essendon - 0 Fremantle - 0 Western Bulldogs - 0
  13. Also gets us FTA exposure again. Sat arvo has become the AFL’s graveyard slot. Sunday arvo is now more prestigious. Collingwood played a stack of Sunday games earlier this year.
  14. I think a comfortable Collingwood win is more likely than Geelong winning by 20.
  15. I doubt we're going to go with JVR, Smith and one of Brown/Schache/Grundy. I don't think we've played three tall forwards since the GWS game (if you allow Fritsch to be the third, as we went in with him, Brown and Smith). We're 5-0 since then with one fewer tall, and scoring well. I doubt that's going to be changed now.
  16. I think we have as tough a run home from here as any other side. Carlton and Sydney are two of the form teams of the competition right now. But I think "limping over the line" is a bit melodramatic, given that, in the last month: We rested our stars in the fourth quarter yesterday and appeared to ease up, with a six-day break coming We blew Richmond off the park in the fourth quarter last week We came from 5 goals down in the fourth quarter to beat Brisbane We were patchy yesterday for sure, but the previous three weeks were pretty solid hit outs and whilst we had issues in all three, I don't require us to be flawless to consider we have a chance to do serious damage in September. There isn't a flawless team out there right now.
  17. Sums up this situation perfectly IMO.
  18. They still need another 3 goals (without Fremantle scoring) to pass us on percentage.
  19. For two weeks. Surely we want them to beat Port as well in Round 23?
  20. I can’t get around this deathriding stuff. We absolutely want Brisbane to lose. A flag and pick 6 is infinitely better than no flag and pick 4.
  21. But he was averaging 4 goals a game the past 2 weeks. His recent form was promising. I agree it’s not the end of the world. He only returned last week and we won 3 straight without him, including Brisbane and Adelaide.
  22. Geelong and Sydney are the most likely to pounce on St Kilda and GWS, who are the two most shaky current top 8 sides. But if Adelaide beat Sydney in a fortnight (at home) and we then beat Sydney in Round 24, could also be Adelaide.
  23. titan_uranus replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    You might do well to take a leaf out of his book.
  24. St Kilda kicking 1 goal in the second half against a Carlton side missing most of their starting midfield is just rubbish. They had the chance to win this game, have blown it, and now face the slide that their form warrants.
  25. titan_uranus replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I’m taking solace from when Ross Lyon said Max King was done for the year a month ago yet he’s back playing today. But it does seem Petty’s going to struggle to get back soon.