dazzledavey36

Well Tim Lamb isnt going to come out so early on the trade period and confirm how much we will play. In fact, he was asked that particular question and refused to answer which says to me that if traded we will indeed pay some portion of his salary.

Go back and read what Tim Lamb wrote on the Jackson trade. He talked a big game on a "generational talent" about needing more then just pick 13 and a future pick. In the end he accepted exactly what he said he wouldnt accept initially. That's folding.

I gave you proof of folding at trades.. Luke Jackson. He was out of contract and talked a big game considering he said Luke was a "generational" talent and would need to be more then just pick 13 and future pick.. at the end he folded and accepted exactly that. Dont beat your chest demanding more only to then accept the same offer you say ypu wouldnt except? Where is the proof that it was a board decision?

My gripe with Tim Lamb isnt just narrowed down to trading a contracted player out. You do realise there that being an official list manager of the club right? Clearly not.. He has made dumb list management decisions by bringing genuine list cloggers to giving out ridiculous long term contracts to Jack Viney. You're delusional if you think he has done a great job of late.

Well let's just with the big chest pumping about Luke Jackson on October 4 2022 hey? Speaking to AFL.com.au's Callum Twomey and Riley Beveridge on Continental Tyres AFL Trade Radio on Tuesday, Lamb said it "would be fair to say" they would look to secure more than Fremantle's pick 13 and a future first-round selection, and will look to strike a deal with whichever club can offer the better package. Obviously, both Freo and West Coast are still exploring their options and we are going to do a deal with whoever comes up with the best deal for us, for Luke to get back to Western Australia," Lamb said. "Where that stands at the moment is we are just waiting for the best offer from both clubs. We've had initial talks with both of them but it hasn't progressed very far at all. "We'd love to get as early in the draft as we could this year, understanding that obviously when you deal with a futures market, you can't predetermine where that pick will land. We understand that. "Luke was a pick three, he's a Rising Star winner, premiership player, he's 21 years old. Whoever gets Luke is getting 12 years of what we would describe as a generational talent so I think we are being fairly reasonable there." Now let's look at the final trade.. Melbourne gets pick 13, Fremantle's future first round pick and future second round pick (tied to the Dockers) in exchange for Jackson, picks 44 and 67. GWS gets Toby Bedford. Huffed and puffed at the start then folded in the final hurdle. Should we discuss the McAdam trade whilst we are at it?

Yeah for an ex copper he sure does know how to fold like a deck of cards when push comes to shove.

Watching Tim Lamb talk tough is funny.

Im guessing this next meeting is the club now offering him an official contract offer from our end.

What great pick do we have?

They can easily block because he is still in contract regardless of whether he nominates.. How many times have seen contracted players request to trade only to not happen because the club hold all the power. Dunkley, Daniher, Papley are just prime examples.

Yes, correct.

Gets a lot right then wrong and has broken some fairly big stories of late. People get so butt hurt about him that its actually funny watching them cry and melt over him doing his actual job.

No, as in GC would be asking for 3 first round draft picks for Humphrey as a starting point.

Referencing Kane and Kingy to justify how good Tim Lamb is as funny as Adam saying that Gawn and Viney contracts last year were board only decisions and not list management.

Tom Morris just said that if Melbourne ask for Humphrey in the Petracca deal then Gold Coast will walk away. Reckons they would ask for 3 first round picks.

Their first pick isnt until pick 38 which will obviously blow out to the mid 40's

Hows that been working out of late? Or we blaming the board whenever it suits your hatred narrative towards Brad Green and and the rest of the board members?