Farmer

Agreed. , so pleased for him!

Interesting. In the last quarter of the match v NM his disposal was first rate

It’s broadcast live on the ABC

I’m very interested to see again a match review decision when Langdon marked the ball between goal and point post. They showed one clip only, when the ball had been firmly marked, and it was over the line. But I believe it plain that had we seen a couple of earlier clips it would have shown that initial contact was inside the line

Agree re Culley. How on earth did West Coast let him go?

At least a few years ago the Cats were offering that facility

We read before the start of the season that Clarry should have made the move to GWS a season earlier. Then he played v well in their first match . But in all his years as a Dee did he ever suffer such a thrashing as he suffered on Saturday ?

No. But u do get a discount if u have ever sat alongside Ralph at a Dees’ match

I’ve also been thinking ( a worry I know). I would play Heath on Sunday.,it is The best game for him to start his MFC career and IMV , the boy can play. I also don’t want to see JVR moving away from CHF in order to fill in in the ruck . In the absence of Kentfield I would play double max !

Gosh, u guys have got it in for Kolt. Surely he plays. Culley unlikely on this prep

Yep pretty close I think

Damn it. Kolt played well last week. Some great marks, and THAT GOAL

And Jefferson ( who has never played CHF incidentally) instead of Kentfield. Not on the basis of last Friday

Well Look I hope u r correct. I would like the boy to succeed. Surely the plethora of forward line coaches could work out his best approach. But on Friday he looked lost, and when he had a couple of genuine marking chances he fluffed them

Gosh, he was disappointing on Friday. Whilst JVR wasn’t great, he was regularly leading up to the ball. I may be incorrect but I didn’t see Jeffo leading