Anyone have the scores for this match?

Anyone have the scores for this match?

Sandringham 13.7 to Box Hill 4.8 at 3/4 time

Sandringham 13.7 to Box Hill 4.8 at 3/4 time

Final Sandringham 13.10 to Box Hill 5.12

Seniors

Sandringham 4.2.26 5.4.34 13.7.85 13.10.88

Box Hill Hawks 0.2.2 2.6.18 4.8.32 5.12 .42

Goals

Sandringham Miller 3 C Johnson S Martin Martyn Poyas 2 Bizzell Valenti

Box Hill Hawks Bull Dowler Ellis Kennedy Thorp

Best

Sandringham Summers Poyas Buckley Lamb Garland Miller

Box Hill Hawks Markovic Thurgood Renouf Bull Tuck Thorp

Reserves

Sandringham 3.9.27 5.11.41 5.14.44 9.18.72

Box Hill Hawks 3.3.21 9.6.60 12.9.81 16.13.109

Goals

Sandringham Weetra 3 Curcio Gileno 2 Goold Hughes

Box Hill Hawks Cook Marguccio 3 Batt Conyers King 2 Barker Buchanan Pedersen Robinson

Best

Sandringham Johnston Gileno McKenzie A Martin Neville Dean

Box Hill Hawks Buchanan Batt Marguccio Pedersen King Holmes

Isaac three goals for the ressies

he is a dark horse!

Isaac three goals for the ressies

he is a dark horse!

how about millers 3 goals? might be needed next week, so dutchy can play on rocca

5.12-42 Box Hill Hawks 2:00 PM

Sun 12/Aug

Box Hill City Oval

def. by

13.10-88 Sandringham

Box Hill Hawks

Goal Kickers: D. Bull, X. Ellis, B. Dowler, M. Thorp, J. Kennedy

Best Players: L. Markovic, J. Thurgood, B. Renouf, D. Bull, T. Tuck, M. Thorp

Sandringham

Goal Kickers: B. Miller 3, C. Johnson 2, S. Martin 2, G. Martyn 2, E. Poyas 2, S. Valenti, C. Bizzell

Best Players: P. Summers, E. Poyas, S. Buckley, C. Lamb, C. Garland, B. Miller

Didn't see or hear anyting more - awaiting reports with interest - esp how did PJ go??

Interesting to see Buckley, Garland and Miller names.

[....

Its a good result given they beat Sandy at TBO last time. And Sandy had a weaker side this time at least on paper than when they last played.

Its disappointing that Some MFC listed players did not feature more in the best. Not a good sign at all for a couple of players.

how about millers 3 goals? might be needed next week,........

To do what??

5.12-42 Box Hill Hawks 2:00 PM

Sun 12/Aug

Box Hill City Oval

def. by

13.10-88 Sandringham

Box Hill Hawks

Goal Kickers: D. Bull, X. Ellis, B. Dowler, M. Thorp, J. Kennedy

Best Players: L. Markovic, J. Thurgood, B. Renouf, D. Bull, T. Tuck, M. Thorp

Sandringham

Goal Kickers: B. Miller 3, C. Johnson 2, S. Martin 2, G. Martyn 2, E. Poyas 2, S. Valenti, C. Bizzell

Best Players: P. Summers, E. Poyas, S. Buckley, C. Lamb, C. Garland, B. Miller

No more detail.

Interesting to see Buckley, Garland and Miller named. Anyone who was there - how did PJ go??

Its a good result given they beat Sandy at TBO last time. And Sandy had a weaker side this time at least on paper than when they last played.

Its disappointing that Some MFC listed players did not feature more in the best. Not a good sign at all for a couple of players.

To do what??

So a player fails to catch the attention of the official that picks the best players.... all of a sudden that isn't a good sign? 1 bad game?

You're very ordinary indeed, Champ.

i posted a topic a couple of weeks ago on Peter Summers saying that he is ready to play afl and once again he is named BOG

Good to hear Buckley played well. I've recently become friends with someone who's been friends with him since they were kids, and she says he lives and breathes footy. Was a die-hard Melb supporter, and has made playing in the red n blue his life. Apparently he is insanely hardcore compulsive about it, doesnt go out pubbing etc, and trains himself into the ground, whether with the team or on his own. Was sad not to be playing this weekend, but will continue to work his ass off to be able to pull on the red n blue. It's always good to hear about players who have a real passion and pride for the jumper

Good to hear Buckley played well. I've recently become friends with someone who's been friends with him since they were kids, and she says he lives and breathes footy. Was a die-hard Melb supporter, and has made playing in the red n blue his life. Apparently he is insanely hardcore compulsive about it, doesnt go out pubbing etc, and trains himself into the ground, whether with the team or on his own. Was sad not to be playing this weekend, but will continue to work his ass off to be able to pull on the red n blue. It's always good to hear about players who have a real passion and pride for the jumper

I was at the game and you can take it from me that irrespective of the official best players, Simon Buckley was easily the best player on the ground. So when the publicity starts about the possibility of a Buckley playing in Friday night's game, the Buckley could be Simon, not Nathan.

So a player fails to catch the attention of the official that picks the best players.... all of a sudden that isn't a good sign? 1 bad game?

You're very ordinary indeed, Champ.

Which player is that "Champ"?

For players that are on the MFC fringe, the inability to be prominent in a VFL game is not a good sign especially when for some of them its been consecutive weeks. And its only a sign in the absence of further information.

What is your problem?

I was at the game and simon buckley was clearly best on, it is usually a problem with the best with sandy officials doing the best the tend to put sandy players in over melb ones.

Also did anyone see the 2's and hughes's goal. One of the goals of the year!

Does anyone think guy martyn looks like the zebra mascot? He has a fairly big head and a smallish body lol!

Which player is that "Champ"?

For players that are on the MFC fringe, the inability to be prominent in a VFL game is not a good sign especially when for some of them its been consecutive weeks. And its only a sign in the absence of further information.

What is your problem?

No problem "Champ" but you make such sweeping statements that hold absolutely no water. Instead of " Not good for a bunch of Melbourne listed players not to make the best", name them and how often they have been outside of the best.

I think you also need to assess who actually chooses the "Best" players, several times last year a Melbourne listed player would absolutely dominate a game, yet be overlooked for a Sandy youngster.

Don't take it all on face value, Champ.

No problem "Champ" but you make such sweeping statements that hold absolutely no water. Instead of " Not good for a bunch of Melbourne listed players not to make the best", name them and how often they have been outside of the best.

I think you also need to assess who actually chooses the "Best" players, several times last year a Melbourne listed player would absolutely dominate a game, yet be overlooked for a Sandy youngster.

Don't take it all on face value, Champ.

It was only reference as a "sign" petal. It was not a sweeping statement. Its not relevant who chooses it. The relevance is the MFC listed player performing and justifying his selection. I dont have to names. But your the one big on your own research. Go do some.

Try Bizzell and CJ for starters. Its now been a number of weeks and they have not apparently dominated at this level. They should be.

BTW, it is not good sign for MFC player not to be prominent in the best. If they are fighting for their careers its not. I dont care who selects it.

5.12-42 Box Hill Hawks 2:00 PM

Sun 12/Aug

Box Hill City Oval

def. by

13.10-88 Sandringham

Box Hill Hawks

Goal Kickers: D. Bull, X. Ellis, B. Dowler, M. Thorp, J. Kennedy

Best Players: L. Markovic, J. Thurgood, B. Renouf, D. Bull, T. Tuck, M. Thorp

Sandringham

Goal Kickers: B. Miller 3, C. Johnson 2, S. Martin 2, G. Martyn 2, E. Poyas 2, S. Valenti, C. Bizzell

Best Players: P. Summers, E. Poyas, S. Buckley, C. Lamb, C. Garland, B. Miller

No more detail.

Interesting to see Buckley, Garland and Miller named. Anyone who was there - how did PJ go??

G'day Mono, didn't see you there. PJ went ok, did some nice things, Miller went OK, attacked the mark & pack hard on a couple of occaisions. Got the ball plenty but doesn't trust his instincts to use the ball himself. Prefers to dish it off for someone else to use it. I wonder if he's a virgin. Looked to find a little of his aggresion at the ball. Our new coach might be good for him, another year for him. I'm starting to like buckley more, he looks a little more comfortable after a few games in the red & blue but needs to push himself for his own development. Garland is a beauty to my mind, he looks to me like a thinker, a kid who seems to think very calmly on his feet & gives me the impression that he's very conscious of what's happening around him & his place in his world, a master of his own destiny & overseer of his development. He's giving himself the time he needs to learn & grow physically. Watch him over the next 2 years.

Thanks for the report dee-luded......

Reading the opinion of those there is wonderful for those of us that have no way to see the games.

So it is greatly appreciated :D !!!