Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

I watched the last 2 Casey games, and despite the poor opposition, it struck me that the structure with the 2 key forwards (Jefferson & JVR) is working a treat. They team together well and it takes me back to the days of Ross Dillon & Greg Parke since I have seen two genuine talls interchange between the 2 key posts. Perhaps their time at Casey will develop them into a lethal combo. Brisbane did it last year with Daniher and Hipwood, with medium-sized, smaller forwards buzzing around them. Rayner, Berry, Cameron, Ah Chee, Bailey & Lohmann, with Morris as the third tall, won a flag. The Pies ideally want Mihocheck & McStay as their key forwards, with assistance from their rucks to provide marking power. The support team is McCreery, Elliot, Hiil and the Daicos boys (De Goey) if fit. Geelong have always had Hawkins and Cameron

I cannot help but feel our forward structure is a bit light on. Petty has been forward and back, Melk plays his role, but is 33, Kozzie cannot be everywhere, and Chin, Sharp are role players. I am not sure where Fritta fits in.

In short, I believe we have at best a makeshift forward line. In 21 we had Brown and Tommy with Jackson up forward. Trac, NIbbler, Ftitta and Kozzie all playing as forwards even Harmes.

I think to advance after this year, we need a better structure built around 2 key marking forwards. Langford is big enough to play permanent forward and a bit more class than we have. What does everyone else think? I so hope that JVR & Jeffo take the next step

 

I like the structure of having to permanent key forwards, almost tag-teaming between offering the connecting leads up the ground and staying at home so there is always a target ready to take the mark inside 50, whether by precision or simply making the contest meaningful.

Ideally you would also have them both be close to 100% time on ground, with the frequent 'rests' as the forward remaining inside the 50 allowing plenty of time to replenish.

Around that, of course, the ideal would be to have multiple players who can rotate through the middle, half forward and wings and be used forward whenever the situation calls for it. And, of course, the joy of the swing tall defender-forward.

Important to remember that in 21 we only had both McDonald and Brown available at the same time for the later part of the season, and that it was actually Fritsch who benefit the most from that. The evolution of the game since then kind of confirms that it is necessary to be flexible and be able to move away from or closer to goal as circumstances demand.

So, yes, I agree with the heart of your post and just wanted to add a long-winded rant!

JVR and Jefferson are theoretically our future 1-2 key forward punch and should be getting games together after the bye, in what’s clearly now a “reset” year. (It’s amazing how one loss can sink a season)

Unfortunately they both played together V’s Hawthorn and it was a bit of a disaster. But we should persist with these two once finals are unofficially shot after Kings Bday.

 
4 minutes ago, Demonic Dave said:

We have Petty, Turner and Johnson as our new key defense

Johnson as KPD??? Are you sure? Adams, sometime, maybe.

Lever looks shot, and May not far behind.


I've always liked the KPF and second KPF/ruck. That could be Jeffo and JVR, but it has to be Petty and JVR at the moment.

Jeffo will fill the Melky role in time, if he makes it.

I’d love JVR and Jeffo to make it as our one-two punch long term as I think they compliment each other really well as different ‘types’

Unfortunately JVR has regressed badly this year and Jeffo, while improving, is still at least a year or two away from having the body for AFL football, and that’s before we really know whether he’ll make it at the level or not

I don’t want to write either of them off but I still believe we badly need an interim forward in that 25-30 age / 195cm - 200cm height range to give us a focal point and take the pressure off those two

Why we’re not heavily into Oscar Allan is beyond me - he’s not a star but he’s proven and fills a need we’ve had for years

 
14 hours ago, monoccular said:

Johnson as KPD??? Are you sure? Adams, sometime, maybe.

Lever looks shot, and May not far behind.

Or Luker


16 hours ago, Older demon said:

I watched the last two Casey games, and despite the poor opposition, it struck me that the structure with the two key forwards (Jefferson & JVR) is working a treat.

Works a treat at VFL level

Edited by lorn

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Port Adelaide

    With both sides precariously positioned ahead of the run home to the finals, only one team involved in Sunday’s clash at the Adelaide Oval between the Power and the Demons will remain a contender when it’s over.  On current form, that one team has to be Melbourne which narrowly missed out on defeating the competition’s power house Collingwood on King's Birthday and also recently overpowered both 2024 Grand Finalists. Conversely, Port Adelaide snapped out of a four-game losing streak with a win against the Giants in Canberra. Although they will be rejuvenated following that victory, their performances during that run of losses were sub par and resulted in some embarrassing blow out defeats.

    • 1 reply
  • NON-MFC: Round 14

    Round 14 is upon us and there's plenty at stake across the rest of the competition. As Melbourne heads to Adelaide, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches of the Round. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons’ finals tilt? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

      • Like
    • 184 replies
  • REPORT: Collingwood

    The media focus on the fiery interaction between Max Gawn and Steven May at the end of the game was unfortunate because it took away the gloss from Melbourne’s performance in winning almost everywhere but on the scoreboard in its Kings Birthday clash with Collingwood at the MCG. It was a real battle reminiscent of the good old days when the rivalry between the two clubs was at its height and a fitting contest to celebrate the 2025 Australian of the Year, Neale Daniher and his superb work to bring the campaign to raise funds for motor neurone disease awareness to the forefront. Notwithstanding the fact that the Magpies snatched a one point victory from his old club, Daniher would be proud of the fact that his Demons fought tooth and nail to win the keenly contested game in front of 77,761 fans.

    • 1 reply
  • PREGAME: Port Adelaide

    The Demons are set to embark on a four-week road trip that takes them across the country, with two games in Adelaide and a clash on the Gold Coast, broken up by a mid-season bye. Next up is a meeting with the inconsistent Port Adelaide at Adelaide Oval. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 180 replies
  • PODCAST: Collingwood

    I have something on tomorrow night so Podcast will be Wednesday night. The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Wednesday, 11th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees heartbreaking 1 point loss to the Magpies on King's Birthday Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

    • 37 replies
  • POSTGAME: Collingwood

    Despite effectively playing against four extra opponents, the Dees controlled much of the match. However, their inaccuracy in front of goal and inability to convert dominance in clearances and inside 50s ultimately cost them dearly, falling to a heartbreaking one-point loss on King’s Birthday.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 533 replies