3 hours ago, Dante said:

I think that's precisely what STMJ was saying to you.

 

Sorry he used the word debate, thought I was on wrong forum

It is the necessity of a small group of posters, who constantly assure me they don't read my posts, to find an issue, no matter how small in my post to 'discuss', that's not debate that's a pissing contest

Spencer being the prime example, report on training, ok Spencer was oustanding , fact,  reported by at least 2 observers, that is all, but because it was Spencer

I am also being asked to self censor, so therefore 1 rule for all or not?

I don't read a lot of what is posted by certain posters now, but if I am quoted I am sure I am allowed the right of reply and I'm sure the mods would agree

 

Edited January 25, 20179 yr by Satyriconhome

10 minutes ago, Satyriconhome said:

Sorry he used the word debate, thought I was on wrong forum

It is the necessity of a small group of posters, who constantly assure me they don't read my posts, to find an issue, no matter how small in my post to 'discuss', that's not debate that's a pissing contest

Spencer being the prime example, report on training, ok Spencer was oustanding , fact,  reported by at least 2 observers, that is all, but because it was Spencer

I am also being asked to self censor, so therefore 1 rule for all or not?

I don't read a lot of what is posted by certain posters now, but if I am quoted I am sure I am allowed the right of reply and I'm sure the mods would agree

 

Carry on as normal Saty you have my vote.

16 minutes ago, Satyriconhome said:

Sorry he used the word debate, thought I was on wrong forum

It is the necessity of a small group of posters, who constantly assure me they don't read my posts, to find an issue, no matter how small in my post to 'discuss', that's not debate that's a pissing contest

Spencer being the prime example, report on training, ok Spencer was oustanding , fact,  reported by at least 2 observers, that is all, but because it was Spencer

I am also being asked to self censor, so therefore 1 rule for all or not?

I don't read a lot of what is posted by certain posters now, but if I am quoted I am sure I am allowed the right of reply and I'm sure the mods would agree

 

This is a forum, some will agree with you some will not, that could be a once off, or all the time, but the nature of a forum is that everyone has an opinion. I'm not that sensitive that I have to argue with everyone that disagrees with me, it's simply not that important and I can't assume that I'm always right.

If you feel the need to respond to every poster that differs from you, then good on you, but you have to also expect that that applies in reverse and those that differ to you have the same right of reply. Me, I just get on with it, my skins not that thin that I have to take umbrage over every comment that refutes my opinion, I'd suggest that you think about doing the same.

This forum gets clogged up with petty, back and forth posts that do nothing for the site, try letting someone else have the last word, maybe you'll find it doesn't hurt as much as you thought it might.

Enough.....thread locked