One player wouldn't have made much difference child, back in your box you go. 

On 4/29/2016 at 3:57 PM, old dee said:

We will win this not because we are on a roll or the Saints are not as good as us but because we now have players with better skills who are not mentally damaged.

Like I said...

On 29/04/2016 at 4:01 PM, H_T said:

 

To me there is still an element of lack of confidence if the mindset isn't right. And we are still prone to awful errors that lead to turnovers and help feed a poor mindset. We have improved, undoubtedly. But there will still be hiccups with this crew. 

 

 

Lotto numbers please..

Just PM me 

On 4/30/2016 at 5:46 PM, Jesse Christ said:

One player wouldn't have made much difference child, back in your box you go. 

Another inside Mid which kinda means that you have options tpo use another player on the outside which is where we got smashed!

You don't mind calling me a child and if that is your response then put up a credible one yourself re selection oh oracle of the ages!!

Now just to show you what I mean, If IF we had of won many on this site would have said Jesse Hogan made the difference! As it was would St. Kilda have won without Reiwoldt?? I doubt it!

Food for thought Oracle I await your Response with interest

"The man with the child in his eyes"

also I note in your profile Jesse, that you are a female poster is that corect??

Edited May 3, 20169 yr by picket fence

1 hour ago, H_T said:

Like I said...

Fairly large miscalulation on my part H_T

40 minutes ago, picket fence said:

Another inside Mid which kinda means that you have options tpo use another player on the outside which is where we got smashed!

You don't mind calling me a child and if that is your response then put up a credible one yourself re selection oh oracle of the ages!!

Now just to show you what I mean, If IF we had of won many on this site would have said Jesse Hogan made the difference! As it was would St. Kilda have won without Reiwoldt?? I doubt it!

Food for thought Oracle I await your Response with interest

"The man with the child in his eyes"

also I note in your profile Jesse, that you are a female poster is that corect??

Whats wrong with being a Female poster Pickett? Pretty irrelevant to the discussion i would have thought.

7 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Whats wrong with being a Female poster Pickett? Pretty irrelevant to the discussion i would have thought.

Nothing at all Dazzle, From what I believe, Demonland subscribes to Poliical Correctness and Affirmative action policies, I would just like to know so that in future I can frame an appropriate response!! Fair enough??

Edited May 3, 20169 yr by picket fence

44 minutes ago, picket fence said:

Nothing at all Dazzle, From what I believe, Demonland subscribes to Poliical Correctness and Affirmative action policies, I would just like to know so that in future I can frame an appropriate response!! Fair enough??

They even let short tempered half-wits post.  We are blessed to be a part of this all inclusive community child  

2 hours ago, old dee said:

Fairly large miscalulation on my part H_T

But I love the new OD, so don't stop the positivity.

Edited May 3, 20169 yr by AdamFarr

4 minutes ago, AdamFarr said:

But I love the new OD, so don't stop the positivity.

I am out of the country for the next two games AF so how does this grab you?

A win this week followed by a loss the following.

We can beat  GCS they have been devastated by injury and the Dogs have too much talent for us.

13 minutes ago, old dee said:

I am out of the country for the next two games AF so how does this grab you?

A win this week followed by a loss the following.

We can beat  GCS they have been devastated by injury and the Dogs have too much talent for us.

Realistic, but I reckon we might give them both a run for their money. You could argue the Dogs are hamstrung (pun intended) by injuries as well. As someone else mentioned, I'd say we're more likely to win the next two and then get run off our feet by a quicker Brisbane team.

We're very much on track for finals if we can win 2 of the next 3 though.

Edited May 3, 20169 yr by AdamFarr

2 minutes ago, AdamFarr said:

Realistic, but I reckon we might give them both a run for their money. You could argue the Dogs are hamstrung (pun intended) by injuries as well. As someone else mentioned, I'd say we're more likely to win the next two and then get run off our feet by a quicker Brisbane team.

We're very much on track for finals if we can win 2 of the next 3 though.

Sorry AF I find that hard to agree to. We are a ten win team this year you saw on Saturday that we can still be very ordinary.

We have a much improved list but still have a lot of wet behind the ears kids who need another couple of years before they propel us into finals games.

3 hours ago, picket fence said:

Another inside Mid which kinda means that you have options tpo use another player on the outside which is where we got smashed!

 

Please tell me who miraculously makes the transition to becoming an outside player because we brought in another inside player.

Your argument has merit if you say we should have brought in Billy Stretch as he is pure outside run but as we got smashed on the outside Oliver would not have been answer to that.

Brayshaw gets more outside ball than Oliver does ( and I'm not saying Brayshaw should have played either)

17 minutes ago, old dee said:

Sorry AF I find that hard to agree to. We are a ten win team this year you saw on Saturday that we can still be very ordinary.

We have a much improved list but still have a lot of wet behind the ears kids who need another couple of years before they propel us into finals games.

Agreed. But if we do get to the 12 game mark, judging by the tightness of the competition this year, that could get us in. And don't worry, I'm with you, we'll certainly have games that we lose where those younger players will run out of gas and our 'leaders' will fail to stand up.

56 minutes ago, nutbean said:

Please tell me who miraculously makes the transition to becoming an outside player because we brought in another inside player.

Your argument has merit if you say we should have brought in Billy Stretch as he is pure outside run but as we got smashed on the outside Oliver would not have been answer to that.

Brayshaw gets more outside ball than Oliver does ( and I'm not saying Brayshaw should have played either)

Play Bernie HBF and release Lamumba upfield! Oliver plays as a mid!

Another option Hunt plays also as an outside runner upfield!! 

Plenty of options there!

Edited May 3, 20169 yr by picket fence