Jump to content


Recommended Posts

Posted

Bugger Casey.

Turn the Punt Road oval into 35k seater within walking distance from G and MFC HQ.

Melbourne PT and roads work like a wagon wheel with the easiest spots to travel to at the centre.

Building on the fringe would be pissing into the wind.

  • Like 1

Posted

Bugger Casey.

Turn the Punt Road oval into 35k seater within walking distance from G and MFC HQ.

Melbourne PT and roads work like a wagon wheel with the easiest spots to travel to at the centre.

Building on the fringe would be pissing into the wind.

If you were to make Punt Rd Oval that big a stadium, the stands would have to be as tall as the MCG as half the ground is to close to Punt Road to build a stand there.

Also it wouldn't make a heap of sense as Richmond aren't even one of the clubs that would be looking to play games there.

Posted

Bugger Casey.

Turn the Punt Road oval into 35k seater within walking distance from G and MFC HQ.

Melbourne PT and roads work like a wagon wheel with the easiest spots to travel to at the centre.

Building on the fringe would be pissing into the wind.

Bugger the region we are trying to call our 'home away from home'?

Some on here have got to think not 'what is in the best interests of AFL clubs in Melbourne, but 'what is in the best interest of the AFL club Melbourne.'

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Casey is slightly smaller than the greater Geelong area, but the population is larger, and is growing faster. The centre of Melbourne from a population perspective is somewhere around Blackburn, and it's too bad Waverly was sold off rather than fixed. If you look at it that way, the western and northern suburbs have good access to two grounds within about an hour on public transport. If you live in the outer east, you need to pack a lunch if you're going by train to the MCG or Docklands.

A stadium at Casey would have a catchment area of the Peninsula, Yarra Ranges, and Knox as well as Casey, and would be getting close to a million people. Its worth a serious look.

(Then move all the co-tenants out there and give us back the MCG)

Edited by michael collins
  • Like 1
Posted

F___ that. Keep it burning up front.

Let's worry about ourselves, and let others deal with the logistics.

This is $500k+ every game here.

We are not trying to get the best deal for the AFL teams in Melbourne - we are trying to get the best deal for ourselves.

@ Casey virtually everyone has to travel out away from Melbourne to get there. if there was a ground around Dandenong or Sandown Park area, people are all closer, as a Dee-centralized Boutique stadium should be.

We'd struggle to fill the ground out at Casey at the moment, but it will grow, & hopefully grow Red'n'Blue.

Posted

@ Casey virtually everyone has to travel out away from Melbourne to get there. if there was a ground around Dandenong or Sandown Park area, people are all closer, as a Dee-centralized Boutique stadium should be.

We'd struggle to fill the ground out at Casey at the moment, but it will grow, & hopefully grow Red'n'Blue.

We would get 20k out there tomorrow for an actual AFL game.

Posted

I'd prefer the MFC focus on building enough members and a quality team such that we can fill the MCG each week, rather than admitting defeat and plumbing for a baby stadium because we can't fill the G.

Aside from that I'd prefer to see us play in Darwin than Casey.

Posted

I'd prefer the MFC focus on building enough members and a quality team such that we can fill the MCG each week, rather than admitting defeat and plumbing for a baby stadium because we can't fill the G.

Aside from that I'd prefer to see us play in Darwin than Casey.

We will never fill the G against GWS or GC or Freo or WCE or PA.

Geelong make money from these games. They make $700k from a game of 25k down at Skilled Stadium.

We will never make that sort of money at the G against those teams.

When we start winning - we will get 35k for those games at the G and not get near that figure.

Playing in Casey against low drawing interstate teams not only cements this club in a growth corridor - it is also allows us to make a mint on games we currently make little to zero money from.

  • Like 2

Posted

What we dont want to do is play at another teams ground. The reason geelong mark so much money is they control the oval, they get to sell the signage, contract out the catering, Get turnover from beer sales, sell the corporate boxes, have a social club, all this adds to the bottom line. Go to princess park or punt road all this money will go to carlton and richmond, we might get a bette kick but the afl would just be adding to the bottom line of these clubs.

Casey is a good option for us, as long as we control the ground.

Posted

Bugger Casey.

Turn the Punt Road oval into 35k seater within walking distance from G and MFC HQ.

Melbourne PT and roads work like a wagon wheel with the easiest spots to travel to at the centre.

Building on the fringe would be pissing into the wind.

The public transport thing shouldn't be overlooked, as its ultimately what killed Waverly. A lot of Melbourne supporters would be travelling 2 hours plus into the city and then out to Casey.

For those of you talking about punt round being too close to the road I think it would have to be moved further in to work but makes a lot of sense. Aami, Tennis, MCG or all right there. It's building on what's already there and has worked for 50 years. Dogs, North, Melbourne and potentially Richmond, Hawthorn and Carlton could play interstate teams there, and potentially VFL teams could play there on off weeks before the game at the G for supporters to attend.

Posted

The great thing about Casey is that it is a blank canvas with a lot of space to work with. The ground is fantastic and almost exactly MCG size (very important) and it is something we can make our own.

If (big if) the funding was there I would be all for it.

Posted

Being an MCC/MFC member, I'm not a huge fan of this idea as if it were to happen and Melbourne was shifted away from the G the membership would lose a lot of its benefit. On the other hand, a smaller stadium would obviously be financially great for the club, the potential for membership in that area is great and the atmosphere at our games would probably be a lot more appealing.

Posted (edited)

We will never fill the G against GWS or GC or Freo or WCE or PA.

Geelong make money from these games. They make $700k from a game of 25k down at Skilled Stadium.

We will never make that sort of money at the G against those teams.

When we start winning - we will get 35k for those games at the G and not get near that figure.

Playing in Casey against low drawing interstate teams not only cements this club in a growth corridor - it is also allows us to make a mint on games we currently make little to zero money from.

Thats fair. however, wouldn't there be many clubs in Melbourne that would have this issue when playing interstate teams?

If so, then a centrally located boutique stadium that enables all the interstate matches with small crowds to be played profitably would seem to make most sense?

I'm not clear, given the MCG is built, and when we have a small crowd there every second shop is closed, why is it so unprofitable? To the extent that building a fresh stadium would be more cost effective. I don't understand this bit..?

Edited by PaulRB
Posted

What we dont want to do is play at another teams ground. The reason geelong mark so much money is they control the oval, they get to sell the signage, contract out the catering, Get turnover from beer sales, sell the corporate boxes, have a social club, all this adds to the bottom line. Go to princess park or punt road all this money will go to carlton and richmond, we might get a bette kick but the afl would just be adding to the bottom line of these clubs.

Casey is a good option for us, as long as we control the ground.

Plus Geelong get to do interesting things like charge visitors more than members for parking (maybe we should do that one, cheeky!) and charge people for a seat - your admission just gets you standing room. Plus they seat punters behind the goals and stick the cheer squad in the pocket. Not a very friendly ground to play at. Perhaps we should take a leaf out of their book and make visitors feel unwelcome from the moment they arrive.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I'm not clear, given the MCG is built, and when we have a small crowd there every second shop is closed, why is it so unprofitable? To the extent that building a fresh stadium would be more cost effective. I don't understand this bit..?

It's to do with the rental agreement on the stadium, plus with a larger ground there will always be more people to employ. Even if we close off the top section they still have to pay people to block the entrances up there.

A small boutique stadium is easier and cheaper to manage, therefor easier to make a profit.

Edited by Pates

Posted

Thats fair. however, wouldn't there be many clubs in Melbourne that would have this issue when playing interstate teams?

If so, then a centrally located boutique stadium that enables all the interstate matches with small crowds to be played profitably would seem to make most sense?

I'm not clear, given the MCG is built, and when we have a small crowd there every second shop is closed, why is it so unprofitable? To the extent that building a fresh stadium would be more cost effective. I don't understand this bit..?

It would be our stadium. As Geelong has Skilled and makes money off of everything - we would have the same or similar set-up.

I couldn't care less about what's best for teams in Melbourne. Just don't care. A Casey 25k seater stadium would set this club up for an eternity.

  • Like 1
Posted

We would get 20k out there tomorrow for an actual AFL game.

Yeah, you might, but its not what I'd call good governance for the game. or the fans. & what is good for the fans is good for the game.

the ground & the area isn't ready, re traffic, & no station built there yet.. so within the confines of the topic, I should say that a Boutique stadium around Footscray would also be good for us, & the other struggling teams...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Demonland Forums  

  • Match Previews, Reports & Articles  

    2024 Player Reviews: #15 Ed Langdon

    The Demon running machine came back with a vengeance after a leaner than usual year in 2023.  Date of Birth: 1 February 1996 Height: 182cm Games MFC 2024: 22 Career Total: 179 Goals MFC 2024: 9 Career Total: 76 Brownlow Medal Votes: 5 Melbourne Football Club: 5th Best & Fairest: 352 votes

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 6

    2024 Player Reviews: #24 Trent Rivers

    The premiership defender had his best year yet as he was given the opportunity to move into the midfield and made a good fist of it. Date of Birth: 30 July 2001 Games MFC 2024: 23 Career Total: 100 Goals MFC 2024: 2 Career Total:  9 Brownlow Medal Votes: 7 Melbourne Football Club: 6th Best & Fairest: 350 votes

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 2

    TRAINING: Monday 11th November 2024

    Veteran Demonland Trackwatchers Kev Martin, Slartibartfast & Demon Wheels were on hand at Gosch's Paddock to kick off the official first training session for the 1st to 4th year players with a few elder statesmen in attendance as well. KEV MARTIN'S PRESEASON TRAINING OBSERVATIONS Beautiful morning. Joy all round, they look like they want to be there.  21 in the squad. Looks like the leadership group is TMac, Viney Chandler and Petty. They look like they have sli

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Training Reports 2

    2024 Player Reviews: #1 Steven May

    The years are rolling by but May continued to be rock solid in a key defensive position despite some injury concerns. He showed great resilience in coming back from a nasty rib injury and is expected to continue in that role for another couple of seasons. Date of Birth: 10 January 1992 Height: 193cm Games MFC 2024: 19 Career Total: 235 Goals MFC 2024: 1 Career Total: 24 Melbourne Football Club: 9th Best & Fairest: 316 votes

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons

    2024 Player Reviews: #4 Judd McVee

    It was another strong season from McVee who spent most of his time mainly at half back but he also looked at home on a few occasions when he was moved into the midfield. There could be more of that in 2025. Date of Birth: 7 August 2003 Height: 185cm Games MFC 2024: 23 Career Total: 48 Goals MFC 2024: 1 Career Total: 1 Brownlow Medal Votes: 1 Melbourne Football Club: 7th Best & Fairest: 347 votes

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 5

    2024 Player Reviews: #31 Bayley Fritsch

    Once again the club’s top goal scorer but he had a few uncharacteristic flat spots during the season and the club will be looking for much better from him in 2025. Date of Birth: 6 December 1996 Height: 188cm Games MFC 2024: 23 Career Total: 149 Goals MFC 2024: 41 Career Total: 252 Brownlow Medal Votes: 4

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 9

    2024 Player Reviews: #18 Jake Melksham

    After sustaining a torn ACL in the final match of the 2023 season Jake added a bit to the attack late in the 2024 season upon his return. He has re-signed on to the Demons for 1 more season in 2025. Date of Birth: 12 August 1991 Height: 186cm Games MFC 2024: 8 Career Total: 229 Goals MFC 2024: 8 Career Total: 188

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 7

    2024 Player Reviews: #3 Christian Salem

    The luckless Salem suffered a hamstring injury against the Lions early in the season and, after missing a number of games, he was never at his best. He was also inconvenienced by minor niggles later in the season. This was a blow for the club that sorely needed him to fill gaps in the midfield at times as well as to do his best work in defence. Date of Birth: 15 July 1995 Height: 184cm Games MFC 2024: 17 Career Total: 176 Goals MFC 2024: 1 Career Total: 26 Brownlow Meda

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 8

    2024 Player Reviews: #39 Koltyn Tholstrop

    The first round draft pick at #13 from twelve months ago the strongly built medium forward has had an impressive introduction to AFL football and is expected to spend more midfield moments as his career progresses. Date of Birth: 25 July 2005 Height: 186cm Games MFC 2024: 10 Career Total: 10 Goals MFC 2024: 5 Career Total: 5 Games CDFC 2024: 7 Goals CDFC 2024: 4

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 9
  • Tell a friend

    Love Demonland? Tell a friend!
×
×
  • Create New...