Geelong

[WonnaJurah 5]

Its been said that the cats have to trade to stay under cap

Names r Stokes, Tenace,D Johnson,Blake,Wojkinki n Harley but he will prob retire

any interest?

[deeflog 679]

Its been said that the cats have to trade to stay under cap

Names r Stokes, Tenace,D Johnson,Blake,Wojkinki n Harley but he will prob retire

any interest?

none

[Maric Legend 0]

Stokes is a good young player, but we don't need him.

[JACKATTACK 17]

Blake, maybe.

[Demons 32 235]

You'd have to have a look at Stokes, talented forward and is still only 24ish I think.

Also as much of a gump as he may be, Blake would be our best ruckman and is still only 24ish as well.

That being said, maybe just hope someone makes it to the PSD.

[southparkboy 0]

Blake, maybe.

Don't we have enough rucks?

[Carn dees 108]

Id love to get stokesy, but his not a need for us.

[JACKATTACK 17]

Don't we have enough rucks?

Depends how you define it, I think our ruck division is seriously wanting at the moment. Not that Blake is really all that great, worth taking at the right price.

[#MYHEARTBEATSTRUE 27]

How about Ryan Gamble?

[Disco Demons 92]

Blake, maybe.

i would prefer to continue with our crop of ruckman...ie., spencer and meesen are still developing...plus I don't rate blake...and can't see what blake will give us that jamar doesn't already give us...that said..i don't like jamar either...

[torpedo 33]

I am no wrap for Jamar but he is much better player than Blake.

Blake is terrible & I am yet to meet a Geelong supporter who thinks otherwise.

If we were to go for any of their rucks I'd have my eye on Mumford.

I rate Gamble, I doubt we are in the market for another inbetween sized forward though.

Stokes will stay.

If Simon Hogan was available I'd be keen.

Edited September 28, 2009 by torpedo

[Bates Mate 4,486]

How about Ryan Gamble?

I thnik gamble is a good player, takes a good grab for his height but a 184cm forward is prob not top of our list, but would take him for a 2nd/3rd round pick (not 18) + Newton

[WonnaJurah 5]

I thnik gamble is a good player, takes a good grab for his height but a 184cm forward is prob not top of our list, but would take him for a 2nd/3rd round pick (not 18) + Newton

Gamble wont be traded , thomson said a while ago

[Nasher 33,614]

Also as much of a gump as he may be, Blake would be our best ruckman and is still only 24ish as well.

Jamar's a better ruckman than Blake. He'd be comfortably second though, sadly. I don't rate the guy.

No interest at all in the others. Especially not David Johnson, they're kidding right? I laughed out loud when I saw that.

[Einstein 1]

Its been said that the cats have to trade to stay under cap

Names r Stokes, Tenace,D Johnson,Blake,Wojkinki n Harley but he will prob retire

any interest?

Nah, no interest for us I would have thought.

And theyre kidding themselves if they think theyll get anything worthwhile for Tenace.

[WonnaJurah 5]

Nah, no interest for us I would have thought.

And theyre kidding themselves if they think theyll get anything worthwhile for Tenace.

wasnt he offered a place at bombers but refused?

[Einstein 1]

wasnt he offered a place at bombers but refused?

Yeah. But when was that? At the end of 2007 I think.

He's played just 6 games since.

He'll probably land somewhere. But Geelong wont get much if anything for him.

[WonnaJurah 5]

Yeah. But when was that? At the end of 2007 I think.

He's played just 6 games since.

He'll probably land somewhere. But Geelong wont get much if anything for him.

was last year wasnt it but they took Prismall instead

D Johnson wont get anything, been there 7 years hasnt even played a finals match and is very injury prone

[Rosso 59]

Even if Geelong were prepared to trade Blake I wouldn't want to go near him simply because he seems like an absolute $hit bloke. Carried on like the biggest sook when he was dropped from 07 GF, then held the club to ransom over Steven King. Contrast that with the class that Wojo and now Stokes have shown in the same scenario (except that both of them are actually worthy of playing in a premiership) and add in the complete lack of class Blake has shown in saying it was nice to stick it up Kings arse on Saturday, and I wouldn;t want this nob anywhere near MFC.

[pantaloons 2,019]

Geelong are going ok if that list represents the talent they have to shed for salary cap purposes. No loss, with the exception of Wocjinski and the retiring Harley.

[DemonDan... 77]

Its been said that the cats have to trade to stay under cap

Names r Stokes, Tenace,D Johnson,Blake,Wojkinki n Harley but he will prob retire

any interest?

Good to know even the best teams have rejects!

But where does that leave Miller, Newts and Co?

Local footy?

Edited September 28, 2009 by DemonDan...

[Keepin up with the Joneses 48]

Gamble wont be traded , thomson said a while ago

Gamble kicks like Newton

[Bring-Back-Powell 14,817]

Perhaps they could package a half eaten ham sandwich for Tenace and D Johnson?

I'd look at Gamble though.

Stokes is surplus to our small fwd division of Aussie, Maric and Jetta.

[Guest sticksmorton]

stokeys is probably one of the most over-rated young players at geelong

i'll go as far as saying his pretty hopeless

wouldn't touch him.

[Guest straussski]

stokeys is probably one of the most over-rated young players at geelong

i'll go as far as saying his pretty hopeless

wouldn't touch him.

i aggree he is no good