Jump to content

loges

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by loges

  1. loges replied to WA Demon13's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Good enough for Geelong who already have Hawkins but not good enough for Melbourne.........hmmmmm
  2. loges replied to WA Demon13's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    So why doesn't a club get him in for a thorough interview and ask the hard questions to see how he responds?
  3. loges replied to Ted Lasso's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Very concerned about Weidemans development, or lack of, to the extent that I think that if he improves to the extent everyone was hoping for, it will be a bonus rather than a given. That said I can't see why we're not trying to bolster our key forward options. We will be heavily reliant on T.Mac.
  4. I always think when this pops up , is it better to be a turd polisher or a turd spreader?
  5. You've proven something alright.
  6. loges replied to WA Demon13's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Yes, and look I understand the knock on him but if he can kick 40+ goals for us he can sit in the goal square all day long. How many forwards kick 40+ goals. Of coarse the risk is will he perform to that level, but at the right price it's worth the gamble.
  7. loges replied to WA Demon13's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    So we should be able to negotiate a reasonable $ amount and a reasonable draft pick.
  8. loges replied to WA Demon13's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Not only that, but they want him out.
  9. loges replied to WA Demon13's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Since he is contracted they have two options, pay part of his contract or all of it.
  10. loges replied to John Demonic's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    You've been pretty confident right through AF. Any reason?
  11. loges replied to John Demonic's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Exactly Nev Jetta is highly regarded on here for good reason. Anyone on here who thinks Elliott is an ordinary player should go back and look at that game.
  12. loges replied to John Demonic's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    May be correct about the hammies. Certainly not underwhelming as a player.
  13. Can someone explain what egonamic means please.
  14. loges replied to Wrecker45's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Long bow
  15. loges replied to Wrecker45's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    For every Dustin Martin there's a Harley Bennell.
  16. loges replied to Diamond_Jim's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Hope GWS are going to review the game.
  17. loges replied to WA Demon13's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    TBH he has his detractors, and may be the tallest small forward going around but I'd back him to kick more goals than Weideman every day of the week........and by a fair margin.
  18. loges replied to John Demonic's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Don't you just get sick of Hawthorn !
  19. Pretty sure it.s associated with self pity. (just looked it up)
  20. No it's wallowing, I'm nigh on 6 decades.
  21. loges replied to Demon Forever's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Don't know why you would post such a thing unless it actually mirrors your own opinion. Laughing at us are they all the way out of the finals 2 years in a row. If roles were reversed and I heard Melbourne thought Hawthorn were a joke I'd be furious. Concentrate on winning first before you start disrespecting a club.. People say Melbourne get ahead of themselves FFS.
  22. loges replied to Demon Forever's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I think it's actually you that thinks the club is a joke.
  23. loges replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    And you know this how?
  24. loges replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Great to hear something at last. Go Vanders
  25. loges replied to Demon Forever's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    They weren't laughing after the final last year or when we beat them this year. Cost them a place in the finals!