Jump to content

What

Members
  • Posts

    12,999
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    32

Everything posted by What

  1. Now now dont be angry ETthetradebreaker, you cant get every scoop.
  2. Do we have too many draft picks and not enough available list spots? Would this mean a trade is imminent?
  3. Yes, a fraction. If you think the sky is falling cos we traded out an average player and are paying a small part of his salary, I dont know what to tell you.
  4. Did they get Lever? No, that was us. Ports trade period is overrated.
  5. Keep up the great work, Josh. Balic for 66 a steal, Lever was the big prize and we got him, and we shipped off a soft inconsistent forward for pick 31. Now I wanna see us package 29, 31 and 35 for something good.
  6. Will be a better player than Jack Watts. Mahoney is kicking goals this trade period.
  7. We had to ship out Watts full salary as we couldn't afford it. So instead of paying 100% of it, we will pay a fraction. And therefore free up salary cap room. And Port wouldn't have done the deal if we didn't pay a part of it.
  8. Probably had to to accommodate Levers salary, the imminent arrival of Balic and all the draftees. Its no big deal.
  9. We now have 29, 31 and 35. Trade one for Schache, take the gamble and back ourselves in to develop him. Get talent in. Sure he may be Watts 2.0, but its worth the gamble.
  10. HF - Salem - T McDonald - Petracca F - Hannan - Hogan - Garlett Move Salem forward to replace the only good thing Watts did, deliver the footy. We wont miss him at all.
  11. Surely we will package up our three 2nd rounders for a nice player or to move up in the draft ... depending on the list situation of course.
  12. Lever is twice the player of Watts, and five years younger. Theres no comparison.
  13. They werent. Port were his only option, nobody else wanted him.
  14. Thank god thats all over. Imagine using the prized pick 1 in the draft to select an uncompetitive player. Diabolical. Now lets package up picks 29, 31 and 35 and get something really nice. Go Dees.
  15. Thats overs for a non competitive player who would have been delisted 4 years ago at any other club. We have done well. I love Goody.
  16. Connors and Watts are the ones dragging it out, not the club.
  17. T mac is a better forward than Watts. Has Watts ever kicked 5 goals in a game? T Mad did just a few games after shifting forward, and hes a career backman. Adios, Jackie boy.
  18. You'd think Jack Viney was being traded out with all the meltdowns going on.
  19. Macca is a great footy mind, and developer of talent. Now I am even more convinced Watts needs to go (though I'd have preferred he was traded years ago).
  20. Rockliff is a good pickup, though his influence in games is negligible despite his gaudy numbers. Watts and Motlop give them two soft outsiders that wont help them improve. They arent getting near a premiership.
  21. No. Not bottom line at all. He might scrape into the top 15.
  22. 206 pages on Jack Watts lol If he was picked anywhere else besides pick 1, most people wouldn't care he was being traded out. Cases in point - Morton, Sylvia and Toumpas.
  23. Not sure why that is, but we are very lucky to have @Ethan Tremblay aka @ETthetradebreaker whos the best in the business
  24. A huge talent going cheap. Why haven't we traded for him yet? I wonder if he can be developed as a key back.,.. playing alongside Lever. I think he has the skill set, as opposed to Weideman who couldn't play as a backman.
×
×
  • Create New...