Jump to content

IRW

Members
  • Joined

Everything posted by IRW

  1. IRW replied to McQueen's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Yep true ..and if it was a week before a Prelim then the odds probably would have shifted the other way. That's how all " courts" work to some degree
  2. IRW replied to Dee Zephyr's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    See my edited conclusion
  3. IRW replied to Dee Zephyr's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Maybe coaches are hard markers or they just remember what Chris Judd did with the ball But if you're trying to fit Max Trac Ollie Kossie and Jake into the mix then the numbers are sure to be difficult to balance
  4. IRW replied to McQueen's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Well if they didn't think the report and penalty was on line with the rules they would have appealed. Surely? They don't have to "say" anything and it's not like cricket where you only get 3 challenges.
  5. IRW replied to McQueen's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Footscray are just making up numbers in the eight... and this year that's only a maybe. They need a new coach even more than North did when Scott somehow kept them from a wooden spoon
  6. IRW replied to McQueen's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Of course, so wouldn't it be nice to close the " please please please.." thread. Anyhow it seems the Club thinks that 2 weeks was a fair penalty. Funny about that
  7. IRW replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Tom is one scan away from retirement. I didn't think it would be this week though
  8. IRW replied to Dee Zephyr's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    50% effective / efficiency
  9. IRW replied to McQueen's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Good luck with that He hasn't signed and the season has begun. The historical odds are really obvious I don't imagine it's the money,the Club will pay anything his agent asks for. We all know that. Angus was upfront saying publicly that he was looking at his options Not a word from Pickett/ Jackson. The other big signings were already committed players nearing their peak (well almost) The only chance is that his unhappiness with the way he was being used last season is now alleviated and he's prepared to stay in a town he still hasn't got to like . Living with Jackson last year wouldn't have helped The simplest explanation is the most likely . One of which is that I am simply often wrong about many things which is good because he was exciting last Saturday. Other that the stupid over the top pointless indiscretion. Playing on the edge is what Selwood did.Its not what Toby Greene does.
  10. IRW replied to McQueen's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Common sense says hes gone but just maybe the team can be the difference. I imagine we'd all like to play in the middle with Max,Trac and Ollie I doubt posting on Land comes into it Yeah Cripps was embarrassing. The AFL is embarrassing actually; a typical Aussie bottom of the world self inflated sense of importance. But at least AFL isn't NRL
  11. IRW replied to McQueen's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I thought I said that the Club might go for the reduction ..not because he doesn't deserve 2 for the dangerous idiocy but because that's the way the AFL " game" is played. Other players, other situations and Michael Chtistian don't really come into it unless the arguments can be sustained in the tribunal rather than the internet. My take out of Saturday is that there is a slight chance he had so much fun as a mid he might think about staying. It wouldn't hurt if the Club fought to get him a reduction. "Please please please stay" and " what about Cripps" is just embarrassing
  12. IRW replied to McQueen's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Yeah rub out the judge and ket Kossie be uncle Byron #fmdmadness
  13. IRW replied to McQueen's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Inconsistency of other is a pretty weak defence from an ethical point of view.
  14. IRW replied to McQueen's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Yeah and if if he's not out for 2 the optics actually say you can still do this and it's OK while you can be sure the likes of Toby Greene would take that on board. There just isn't a get out clause for such a pointless brain fade
  15. IRW replied to McQueen's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    In fairness to Kossie HE was on fire and if anything was going to keep him at the Dee's it was getting midfield time with Max Trac and Ollie.
  16. BBB It's all about the haircut imo And now Tom has painted over the MFC rednblue V off his driveway gate saying "its done its work..time for the new season" I expect he'll come good as well
  17. IRW replied to Lucifers Hero's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Yeah but what about his underground handball
  18. IRW replied to McQueen's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    The thing is that Keating is usually correct Attacking the AFL from a fan page is like throwing a toothpick at a mountain
  19. IRW replied to McQueen's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    It was breathtakingly stupid undisciplined and indicative if someone out of control....even if he really wasn't. The only thing more stupid is spuds trying to defend him. If the Cub can then that will be a " win". Maybe down to one week but its unlikely given publicity around the issue Next you guys will be blaming Ablett snr!! Grow the # up
  20. Max Gawn is the Adam Gilchrist of ruckman. Changes the requirements of the position and has genuine good character
  21. Trac needs to learn to kick and Oliver still needs to use his foot more but no problems with the big guy so it's just a work still in progess
  22. One less game for the Dees though
  23. He should be the spokesperson for the team as well.
  24. He's not as eloquent as Jack though Lol. He makes LJ sound like Shakespeare
  25. IRW replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Er I did mention that it was only round 1 And later observed that a loss against the Dogs would be understandable given the outs as long as we showed a new game and played well. Fulls marks for you for not being hysterical though.