Jump to content

Young Blood

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Young Blood

  1. Agree I think Dion who just turned 20 needs a bit more time to see if he can develop a role for the club. I know its obvious but we won't know until the end of the year, its really hard to pick potential delisted players especially like AVB, McKenna, Kent who will be given a chance to prove themselves once fit. Wagner is definitely staying. I would imagine he will be a required player with Lewis/Vince retirement not too far away. At this stage the only clear one to me is JKH. Has been given a fair of time/development and opportunity and while he can find the ball I just think we have so much midfield depth now he is no longer required. I think Maynard at 26 could also be an option but I'd say they would give him another year considering he hasn't as long in the system/game of AFL.
  2. Well its worked in patches. I think the idea of starting him on the wing would be to get him involved around the ball early. He's then been floating forward taking his usually undersized opposition with him or making the opposition have to switch and lose their structure creating an advantage for him or others as marking options. It didn't work as well against the bulldogs but it has definitely worked through patches of games with him on the wing also as a marking target further up the ground switching with Hogan. I definitely don't think he needs to play as high up the ground as he has been. High half forward for sure in tandem with Jesse.
  3. I thought North only started to find real form after we played them....
  4. Young Blood replied to rjay's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Not really. I just don't think any of the mentioned players as possible ins are going to be have a huge impact over those who played on the weekend. Pedo was average but has built form in the VFL and I would trust him more then Weid at the moment taking marks up the ground. I don't think Vince will come out for a less experienced back, the backline wasn't too bad considering the circumstances (apart from some structure breakdowns). We were beaten comprehensively in the middle of the ground giving our backs little to no chance. It's possible we play Frost to match up on the Westoff/Dixon combo but I think we'll see them give Smith another go on whoever is playing further up the ground.
  5. Young Blood replied to rjay's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I can't see there being any changes unless someones is injured.
  6. Yup more games into Smith please! He's have to be one of the most athletic players I've seen for quite a while. Has all the makings of a good backman.
  7. Young Blood replied to DubDee's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    In relation to perspective and games played wanted to mention here we also have quite a few players under 15 games: Bailey - 11 Spargo - 7 Joel Smith - 4
  8. Yup we were beaten around the ball due to Collingwoods positioning and body use. So many times I saw their players shepherding the ground ball for one of their best mids to swoop in and more the ball on quickly. They held, obstructed and pushed away so effectively like the best teams do and we weren't able to counter it.
  9. What do you rate our performance out of 10 to this point? Why? 7.5/10 - This team is still learning. We have finally been able to put away weaker sides with confidence. There is more belief and trust in the group then I've seen since Roos started. We just need to get more comfortable when we play the better sides in dealing with the pressure and getting it back on our own terms. Which player has impressed you the most? Angus Brayshaw - I always knew he could play to this standard but I'm just so glad he finally got the chance. Which draftee has made the biggest impact? Has to be Bailey. His spacial awareness and reading of the ball/play comes so easily to him. Can't wait to see him develop his body/tank more which can only give him more confidence. What has been our best win to date? Most enjoyable would have to be Adelaide Which player(s) needs to improve in the second half of the year? Tyson needs to learn to play a different role which I believe he can do so successfully. Hunt and Garlett obviously as well. What has been our most disappointing performance? Hawthorn. The other three losses against good sides were because we didn't cope well with the pressure. The effort was there. Against Hawthorn we fell away with our effort. Where do you see us finishing? Give a win/loss and finishing position I think we are a top 8 side. I see us hopefully finishing around 6/7th. @Wiseblood Good thread. Would be keen to see how you think we're going with your answers.
  10. I like this thread. Quite happy for the expectations to come back down to where they should be. To be a top four side you need to perform in the big games against better teams which we are yet to achieve this season. Aim should be to make the eight until we can start winning some big games.
  11. I really doubt the FD are going to replace Lewis or his role before the end of the season. I agree he looked off the pace yesterday and the style of game did not suit him one bit. His weaknesses were exposed by Collingwood but this was a result of our inability to slow them down. He wasn't given any time or space due to the lack of pressure applied by our midfield. I listened to Lyon this morning say that Lewis has played well when Melbourne has been able to dictate the flow of the game. Same must be said for Vince. When we are in control they are key in controlling our ball movement across the backline/wing. When the opposition are going blitz attack like yesterday they are caught out of position with little leg speed to make up ground. I guess my point is I think the FD are going to continue to take this risk. I think there are other teams that take the risk and rely on their best pressure backman (eg Jetta/Hibberd) to work hard around the contest and feed the ball to the best disposal players in Lewis/Vince/Salem. The conversation will need to be had at seasons end who can step up into the Vince/Lewis roles. Right now there's no one with the combination of both the ball use/decision making and pace to put pressure on. Wagner is the only one close for mine. Would like to see Tyson and Hung clean up their disposal to become possible options down the line also.
  12. I at least want to see us deal with the pressure better. We haven't faced an in form side like this since Richmond and its showing.
  13. They're much more proactive then we are. They're hedging ie. running forward of the ball in numbers before it even gets there. They're also preempting all our inside ball movement from stoppages, cutting off every handball. Thats going to require a lot of energy to maintain throughout the rest of the game.
  14. We should be dead in the water. But we're not
  15. There were no defenders on the inside. Still very slick hands by Collingwood at the moment. They're far better then us around the ball. We only look dangerous when they turn it over and we can get out. NEED TO START WORKING HARDER AROUND THE CONTEST!
  16. Nice one. Keep it coming Mick
  17. i f'n love James Harmes. Just kindly got the collingwood defender out of the way to boot the goal Need see more bully in this game from the dees
  18. Tommy boy oh boy did we need that one.
  19. Out structures are completly flustered. Collingwood filling all the space and not letting us get an open handball out
  20. Need to possess the ball a bit and take some of collingwoods sting out of the game.
  21. Since he's been coach I haven't minded Bucks. Good to see the black and white out in force wearing the blue beanies. Still do not like Collingwood at all.
  22. Starting to get nervous. Please let us be the cleaner team with disposal to start the game. I'm predicting a pretty scrappy start with both teams going hard with all the build up.
  23. Oscar Baker or McDonald?
  24. Why do we always judge players before they've had a chance to prove themselves? For starters his stats across his 28 games are average on paper yes. But from what I remember he was developing nicely as a third tall option who could also provide good pressure on the opposition backline. He's an above average tackler with solid inside 50 numbers. He's not too quick but like a few of our talls can run all day with midfield experience. He's a solid mark with good size and I can't see why he couldn't add to our depth. Yes Spargo, Fritsch and Hannan are ahead of him. Because those three have played football and proven themselves this year. If Vanders built some form in the VFL why wouldn't you contemplate it for next year? It's how Pederson and Tim Smith were able to break into the side. Two very similarly average footballers to begin with who worked on their games and found a role. I think its a step backwards to write off players without seeing them have a go after some awful luck with injuries.