Jump to content

Random Task

Life Member
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Random Task

  1. If we go tall one of Stumpf, Burmeister, Lowther, Voss might be on the cards. Quite like Josh Murphy as a 3rd tall.
  2. Crazy that Lions have taken 3 academy players and still have 3 picks ahead of us.
  3. I'm on the Zane Cochrane bandwagon as well
  4. Can play. Is good. Looks great in a dees jumper.
  5. #10. Harvey Langford? #19. Xavier Lindsay?
  6. Windsor, Tholstrup, Langford and Lindsay. All good users of the footy and competitive yet compliment each other well with their individual traits. Our future midfield is taking shape.
  7. Random Task replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Dude, I'm making fun of Collingwood. You don't need to ruin it with facts
  8. Random Task replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Kinda like pies trading away pick 2 in anticipation of an early Daicos bid. They could have had Callaghan as well as Daicos.
  9. Random Task replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Berry would be a great pick imo. Speed, skill and toughness.
  10. Riley Bice and Jack Henderson being the others?
  11. Sounds like a player that will immediately add midfield depth and can perhaps play a tagging role if required. After losing Harmes and Jordan we could use his type.
  12. And we won't be taking Lalor, still.. a man can dream.
  13. Random Task replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
  14. Any observations of Jefferson, Turner and Laurie would be appreciated.
  15. Random Task replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Maybe, looks like a nervous kid to me. Mentioned melbourne a couple times and said he would fit in there well with his previous experience from pre-ssason. Curiously Koltyn Tholstrup has reached out to him I the last couple days. Not sure there's much to read into that.
  16. Loki would be very happy about seeing him in red and blue.
  17. Random Task replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Reckon we get Langford at 5 and Tauru at 9. No idea what happens though if Richmond throws everything off with selecting Smith or O'Sullivan at 1.
  18. Random Task replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Richmond I'm not surprised about as they did a deal for Brisbane's first rounder during the trade period. They probably have an understanding, similar to us with Essendon re Kako, to not bid. At least I'd imagine there would be an informal understanding. As for the other clubs, stuffed if I know.
  19. Random Task replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I've seen Draper the least out of this years reported top 10 so my opinion is less informed. But reading up on his weakness it sounds like he's a poor user of the footy.
  20. Cal Twomey posted a table on either twitter or instagram which had all the clubs nominations. Someone posted it in one of the threads. I don't have either app so can't help track down the original source sorry. Info is correct though.
  21. Random Task replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    So likely two of Langford, Tauru, Allan, Lindsay with a pick out the back end.
  22. Random Task replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    There's a realistic scenario where Allan is gone to the Tigers at 7 and Lindsay to the Saints (or GWS via trade).
  23. Correct, by tall I meant your classic key position players
  24. Random Task replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Pretty comprehensive list there SONS. I like that we've been linked to Zane Cochrane, looked fantastic last year as a bottom ager and got going later in the year for oakleigh. Couple other names to look out for include Ben Kennedy, Patrick Said, Archie Caldow, Charlie Rozenes and Asher Eastham (could we go all gippy boys this draft?), I'm hoping Ough becomes a slider to our last selection but hard to see that happening.
  25. It certainly is a fascinating draft. I wouldn't be surprised if we went tall with one of our picks but would be staggered if we went tall with two.