Jump to content

monoccular

Members

Everything posted by monoccular

  1. Good point .... and our crumbers up forward other than Spargo arent your usual smalls. Fritsch, Hannan can take a grab when needed One or two fly, the rest crumb. Sack Goody now replace with Clint. ? Far better to be an optimist who is sometimes wrong than a pessimist who is always right !
  2. The win could be a springboard, hopefully: just hope they have the sense to confiscate the bath plugs to prevent the inappropriate imbibition that has plagued successes in recent times.
  3. And we can’t buy a win at the G so far this year ?
  4. monoccular replied to WERRIDEE's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I too was concerned that playing all three forward (and Max going down deep at times too) would mean that they would get in each other’s way, but it was rare to find more than two in F50. Seemed to work well, and Weed certainly gained in confidence as the match went on.
  5. Short memory? Clarrie was BOG or close on debut and for weeks following
  6. Yes, a patch of bad form, but also does regularly make poor decisions.
  7. ???? Are they referring to the most unlikeable player in the AFL, Goddard? I wonder which of his team mates he blamed today? Anyone still think we should have picked Parish over Oliver?? .... or WCE in Perth.
  8. ???. Imagine the outburst here had Oscar done that .
  9. Makes Brent Moloney look a genius.
  10. Hannan and Fritsch and Spargo >> Garlett and Bugg and Kent
  11. monoccular replied to Josh's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Is Goody now a genius? ?
  12. monoccular replied to Josh's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Hannan and Fritsch >> Garlett and Bugg
  13. monoccular replied to Josh's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Let’s not get too far ahead of yourself - win needed first.
  14. monoccular replied to Josh's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Maybe Joey Daniher told him to ?
  15. monoccular replied to Josh's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Fritsch, Hannan??
  16. monoccular replied to Josh's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Amused to hear Parkin referring to Melksham and Hibberd as Essendon rejects Surely refugees or escapees more appropriate
  17. Visy still make very large strong paper bags. ??
  18. As I recall didn’t they do that late last season — dropped due to poor form, didn’t play VFL, then resurrected the following week. Didn’t make much sense at all.
  19. Pity they don’t all shut off from antisocial media and concentrate on the game and nothing else in season. Hope it pays Jake back in spades.
  20. Well hopefully not the same side as his major one last time.
  21. On the contrary, I would be a bit concerned that it will only encourage more mindless bombing into the forward line. On the fairly rare occasions that HBs and mids “lower their eyes” and kick low to a target we actually look like scoring. Maybe the coach and the players don’t realize this ?
  22. Was subtlety intended? How many connected?
  23. Never forget that a Saints MO sutured a contaminated wound on some player’s leg and he was out for an extended period. How about awaiting the facts (should they ever come out) before condemning either the club or the player. (Even with optimal treatment sometimes things don’t turn out well)
  24. We MUST make a statement here ...... an emphatic win, no half hearted efforts. Anything less will mean curtains for this list and possibly the club, which survived the darkest years mainly due to the name, MELBOURNE