bing181

Think that either Port or Adelaide will be tied up here, both have lower first round picks that they want to move higher.

10 and 14 to Adelaide for Lever plus a second round pick? A steal, and great work by Mahoney, Viney and co.

I just cannot see this happening without a lot of back-pedalling from all concerned: Freo by upping their Trade offer, us by conceding on what we want (5 + one or two second rounders?), and Hogan by reducing his 8/8 demand. Of course, if any one of those parties made serious concessions it could go through, but that looks increasingly unlikely. Welcome to Melbourne Football Club Jesse Hogan?

I think it’s a reference to some kind of biscuit.

Weep.

In terms of getting May, it would be better for us if they kept open the 11 offer, and upped the other part (future 1st round?).

Perhaps. It could also smack of Freo being not as into Hogan as everyone thinks they are ... could be the salary, could be concerns about the foot, could be ... well, anything. Perhaps from their side, they're just not that desperate.

Freo don't even have Pick 5 for the moment, and given how they're approaching negotiations with us, there's a decent chance that the Neale trade won't go through. In any case, there's no way we'd ever be getting 5 + 11, best we could manage given what's available would be 11 + next year's first - though is there some technical issue which means that Freo can't trade their next year's first round pick?

Also a mistake that was a major factor in them winning a grand final.

Freo on a hiding to nothing here. They need a low first or decent second round pick to get Lobb, but hard to see where it's going to come from, as neither we (Hogan) nor Brisbane (Neale) have one. You'd think that neither our second rounder (36) or Brisbane's (32) wouldn't be enough for GWS. Complicated.

May won't be available as FA. Either he'll come to us or the Pies, or he'll re-sign a long-term deal at GC. The May situation has come up for the same reason the Hogan one has: clubs don't want players hanging round for a year till their contract runs out or they become FA. If they won't commit long-term, they're let go.

Explore all avenues/test the water?

Which just goes to show the importance of team-wide defence.

Not sure I'd be calling them "skills".

or hysterical 13 year old schoolboys. FMD.

Maybe there are no FA's we're interested in.

And i'll just throw in a sexist slur.

Looks like the foot is healing well.

"Whatever his decision is, we'll support that."

To be fair, he finished 11th, 1 vote behind Lewis. All he had to do for the games he missed was to be out there for that to have been reversed.

He was 1 vote behind Lewis in 11th, after missing the last few games. Churlish.

Yes. And I have a fast fibre as well. Typical for anything in terms of video that comes through AFL.

Seeing we want 2 of their players, yes ...

As opposed to the macho posturing school of negotiation.

Once again, we won't be keeping players against their interest. It's not in anybody's interest, including ours, to do so.