bing181

He explained why that happened in the post-season interview he did. Not ideal, but he wasn't the only one across the AFL who struggled with the circumstances they were all in.

Speaking of Europe, this today from one of the local online French news services (which mainly recycles International news in French.) Not the only one either. https://news-24.fr/comment-eddie-mcguire-la-royaute-de-melbourne-a-fait-appel-a-ses-contacts-apres-le-scandale-de-racisme-de-collingwood/

At least the Collingwood players get it: "We acknowledge it is not enough to simply show support for the principles of anti-racism and inclusion."

Not if you're on the receiving end.

There's nothing inadvertent about racial discrimination.

Actually, a joint report by two leading academics in the field: Professor Larissa Behrendt and Professor Lindon Coombes, both from the University of Technology in Sydney. Apart from having had a number of roles in the NSW govt., Coombes also worked at that hotbed of lefty radicalism, Price Waterhouse Cooper.

Good to see. This is where the improvement needs to come, not so much the newer draftees.

Hunt never "owned" anything, which is one of the reasons he was moved forward. Good on the club in being proactive in trying to find other positions for them - but all players have their limitations, and Hunt and Harmes are depth with a couple of tricks, and will never be anything more. Of course, all clubs need depth, so hoping they can establish themselves, wherever they play.

"In team sport I have always believed champion players make champion coaches, not vice versa ..." Leigh Matthews

It's because of attitudes like this that people drive their cars into trees rather than confront the reality and seriousness of mental illness and get the help they need.

Most of our woes in a nutshell IMHO.

And just to add ... no accident that the one area of our game where we're consistently doing well is in the backline - where we have both experience and in May and Lever, leadership.

Great post Binman. You see similar evidence when looking at changing coaches mid-season. After all, if it's all down to the coach, or even mostly down to the coach, changing the head coach of a losing team mid-season should see things pick up. Not so it seems. This from a study of sacking coaches mid-season in the Spanish soccer league: "The empirical analysis shows that the shock effect of a turnover has a positive impact on team performance in the short term. Results reveal no impact of coach turnover in the long term. The favourable short-term impact on team performance of a coach turnover is followed by continued gradual worsening of results. The turnover effect is non-existent when the comparison between the new coach and the old coach is done over 10, 15 or 20 matches before and after termination." https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236043349_Coach_Mid-Season_Replacement_and_Team_Performance_in_Professional_Soccer

Isn't executable - not with who we have on the park at the moment. No accident that we used our 2 first-round picks for players who can hit a target by foot.

This.

There are still a lot of ifs in the Forward line, including Ben Brown.

Another great Demonland myth. (Though most supporters at most clubs think the same thing.)

There have been a few of such studies - and not just in team sports either. All with similar outcomes.

At least Pert gets it: “While it's driven through the whole football program, it will be a very big focus and it’s a priority of our program, of the players taking real ownership. “They’ve got to own it, they’ve got to drive it, they’ve got to hold each other accountable.

So Alistair Clarkson is responsible for Hawthorn finishing 15th this year.

This is the delusion upon which the "Goodwin can't coach" edifice is built. We're a mid-table team getting mid-table results. Heck, we don't even have a functioning forward line, or the players to form one - you only have to look at who we've drafted/traded this year to see that that's something that the club recognises. Even if there are those on here who don't.

The players at their disposal might have more than a little to do with it.

You're presuming we wanted Holmes at that pick.

Yes, if only Mahoney hadn't said anything, no-one would have even known about him. Meanwhile, in the real world: ""They've moved up and targeted the elite runner (Max Holmes). He is a spec pick, but there were so many clubs who liked him in this range," Twomey said."

Too many variables to put absolutes on it, though I think anyone saying Top 4 is kidding themselves. Maybe next year if all goes well this season, but the distance between us and the genuine Top 4 sides is still a chasm. But what I'd be looking for more than anything is consistency, lack of which was our undoing this year.