DeeSpencer
Members
-
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by DeeSpencer
-
Not convinced it was coaching. After hot first quarters both us and GWS put the brakes on them. Brisbane aren’t that kind of side so couldn’t hold them as much, but the Pies played a different game because they dominated inside 50’s but struggled to kick goals against a good Lions backline. -
Run from behind is just as big a problem. We either have the laziest rebounding defenders in the league, or they are set up/working too hard defensive or they are poorly coached. I suspect a little of all 3. Should be drop for 10 push ups every time the defenders win the ball back and chip it 20m to Langdon or Hunter on the same with the ball came from. The ball has to exit our back 50 through the corridor or fat side and that means defenders and mids willing to run, handball and kick to the space not the safety of the boundary. The work rate of the Pies and Lions backlines when counter attacking is something completely different to ours.
-
They won because they played high pressure, high tempo footy that allowed them to play the game in their forward half whilst still spreading the ball to find quality scoring chances too. But they also got lucky with low quality chances turning to goals - Sidebottom, De Goey x 2 from outside 50, Crisp which bailed out their lack of key forward impact. Just one of those misses and they might lose and the question would be where are their key forwards? Brisbane got outplayed for most of the game and pulled goals from their backside with a demonstration of forward talent from Daniher, Bailey, Cameron, McCluggage. Defended their back 50 very well too. Overall the lessons from the game were you need forward talent and you need to play fast to score. But Brisbane need a forward/mids coach who can organise them defensively as much as we need one to organise our attack. They don’t chase!
-
3rd in the grand final sprint yesterday! He had an ok first year. Didn’t get much of the ball and was safe but not all that amazing when he did get it. Seemed to stick to the task defensively but there were plenty of times when he was just at a contest but not owning it with decisive marks or spoils. Once or twice a game he would have an intercept mark or spoil that would make you take notice. In the rehab group for most of last summer though so I expect we’ll know a lot more next year.
-
North Melbourne thought they were clever hiring Glenn Luff from champion data and trading with us in a deal they won by a billion draft points. We traded back a few picks took Pickett and Rivers and they were premiership players in year 2. They took Tom Powell and who knows what with the 2nd and 3rd rounders. There’s merit in trading down or back but right now we are in a window and could do with talent who easily could be ready in years 2 or 3. The other issue is you can’t control what the future picks are. We trade for a GC. Essendon or Hawthorn future pick and they could easily both finish top 6. Even with additional second or third round picks that’s probably not the big win. When you trade up at least you control the destiny of the picks.
-
Agree to an extent, I think a standard list of available pick protections (top 5, top 10) is better than allowing teams to get too creative. And that it should be only 2 years of future picks, spaced by a year. So this year you can trade current picks, 2024 and/or 2026 and that’s it. Nothing for years off in the future as it encourages hoarding a heap of picks in a form of tanking pretty much.
-
Pendles and Sidebottom will drop off soon I hope. Mitchell’s had a couple of important finals but is really close to being ineffective, just does enough of what he’s good at in tight. They’ve got some concerns. And their young mids haven’t been good so far, although I remain very high on Ed Allan. Mihocek was meant to be key defensive depth, he’s been excellent despite his quiet game today. Always competes. Howe was meant to be their gun forward, has become a gun defender. Not sure what the list build lesson is there. If anything I guess the lesson is take chances on guys with upside if they combine contested effort and athleticism. Bobby Hill a great pick up. Markov a lovely freebie on the day he was meant to sign with Carlton. McCreery a super pick. Would like to see our list team identify and take some chances. Kelly O’Donnell’s probably in to his long nap time though so I doubt we will
-
I just can’t see end of first round unless Sydney and us get very ‘creative’. Second round is fair, but the system is stupid so that makes the pick quite late. Third round isn’t unreasonable if he’s not getting a big wage, but again, system and that draft itself is a mess so let’s hope that isn’t the case so we don’t get pick 55+. Really the compensation should be the cap space and we should use it to sign a more suitable player. It should be JJ out, McAdam in as both (or neither) should be free agents.
-
I spoke to a former demon last night who wanted to remind Kossie and the current players kicking the ball is all about smooth strokes and not belting the cover off it. Kossie operates at speeds us mere mortals aren’t capable of but you’re right, there’s times he has just take that extra quarter second. And in fairness he’s kicked some blinding goals when he does kick it purely, but there’s chances to either dish off balance up.
-
Charlie’s not an opportunist goal kicker, although when given an even chance he can do that. He’s a link player that relies on other parts of the chain working together. If every player in our side had the attacking work rate, smarts and skills of Spargo we’d hum the ball from end to end. Not saying he’s a walk up start in the side either, but if we want to play faster, cleaner more expansive football that scores more we need him fighting for a spot. I expect he’ll bounce back next year the same way Nibbler did in 2021.
-
How many would he average if our half backs ran and kicked the ball to the fat side and then to Charlie streaming open at half forward? He’d go from 10 to 15 very quickly. I also don’t care how many goals he kicks if he lands the ball on a forwards chest inside 40 and within the corridor 2-3 times a game.
-
A ruckman is an absolute must. Would be straight up list management negligence to go in to next year with Max, Schache, Verrall and not a genuine back up ruck. Key forward should be a must, but I’m wondering if they address it with train on players rather than making a move. Give me the 3 best delisted/state leaguers/overlooked kids and let them battle it out over summer. The draft has always made sense for mids and runners apart from 1-2 cheap back ups if they fit just to fill the list turnover.
-
Made some errors but not many small forwards have 9 shots in 2 finals. Charlie Cameron was mostly stinky last week. Jamie Elliot’s kicked 1 goal in 2 finals. Bobby Hill hasn’t done much since his first quarter against us. I’m hoping for a more mature, calmer, more complete Pickett next year but overall I thought his ability to go to full forward and create chances was impressive and very close to turning around or winning both games.
-
Dogs apparently have a future first on the table too, no doubt for later picks in return. But it takes a lot of top picks to climb high in the order. You don’t get them for unders.
-
-
Banno on the wing. Heath getting significant midfield time. Rightfully saving any midfield time for Paxy for second halves. Maddy Gay forward to ease her through the year. 3 talls, Goldy, Lampard and Blaithin down back when it’s probably Heath and Gay on the flanks of our best backline. (And Blaith on the wing please). Plenty of rest for Loz Pearce on the pine or forward. Zanker to CHF with Tay out. Mick’s really mixed up the side tonight and through the year. They’re getting good training in roles and positions.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
