Jump to content

sue

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by sue

  1. sue replied to Lucifers Hero's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Doesn't that give us 2 extra years to look for a Max replacement?
  2. Some have implied Petty being out with Covid protocols means he has Covid. But does he? or do the current protocols include being a close contact of a case? Anyone know?
  3. sue replied to Sideshow Bob's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Swans may be a better team without him, but we might be better. (Walker has resigned with Crows)
  4. sue replied to Demon_spurs's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Presumably the purpose of the rule way back when was to protect people from coat hanger tackles. But we panalise players for just touching someone on the shoulder and lots of other tackles which present no danger. What if they didn't pay frees for those minor above the shoulder incidents? Then perhaps they'd be no incentive to do a Selwood because what he and his imitators do does not result in any danger to their health and so would not draw a free.
  5. sue replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Correct. But was Chandler trying to knock out the player he concussed?
  6. sue replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    No idea what you guys are arguing about but I’d say Rigged implies the outcome is 100% determined. Manipulated just pushes things in that direction.
  7. sue replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I'd love to believe that. But unfortunately to finish in the top 4, let alone top 2, we can't afford to lose any games and even if Port and the Dogs throw in the towel, we have a tough draw.
  8. sue replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I don't buy the argument that says Geelong will fail in finals because they don't have the advantage of their narrow ground. Sure it is a big advantage in getting them to the finals (ridiculous for a professional sport to allow such a variation in playing area), but they do get to 'practice' every second week on normal grounds. Surely that is enough.
  9. sue replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Of course he didn’t deliberately kick the hand (or impossible to prove otherwise) but surely it is graded as careless etc.
  10. sue replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Someone commented that it was in play and not deliberate so there should be no penalty beyond the free kick. But the offence was kicking in DANGER. Why does this escape further penalty when Chandlers did not? In play dangerous tackle vs in play dangerous kick. The only difference is the focus on concussion. But I bet if Chandler had broken the blokes arm he would have still been rubbed out.
  11. sue replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    We played very poorly last night and maybe cats could have made more of their chances but surely we can take some comfort from the fact we were only centimetres from drawing level during Q4 despite being outplayed.
  12. We can stop complaining about certain teams never playing at Tax Stadium. Now that the AFL is increasingly focussing on TV viewership and is happy to generate artifical crowd noises, in a few years they won't give a damn about making C'wood play at Kardinia Park.
  13. I have a Guide to Reading the Match Day posts. It bears a striking similarity to Demonstone's Guide on Posting to the Luke Jackson thread. ie. Don't.
  14. sue replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Wasn't one of those goals a result of a short pass onto his chest by Weid? If so, I'd say they sahred that one.
  15. sue replied to DeeSpencer's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Yes, he did what he had to - and could do. But in the longer term he needs to be able to do more in some role. Presumably/hopefully somewhere there is a big bodied back-up ruck available in 2023 (Daw Mark II) who could ruck better?
  16. sue replied to Blistering's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    and you're posting on a footy fan site?
  17. sue replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I wish someone would invent a machine that can reproduce such blows accurately and wheneever a commentator says a player dropped too easily they would have to take the same blow from the machine. They'd shut up quick smart.
  18. sue replied to Blistering's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    To those that say "we won, get over the umpiring", I say there is nothing wrong with discussing any and all aspects of a game. When the umpiring is egregious, it is likely to figure prominently in people's comments on the game. Why not? We don't have to prove how morally superior we are by chosing to overlook it. Furthermore when you can only see a match on TV, there is a lot you cannot see and therefore can't reasonably discuss, but the umpiring usuallly stands out. It has been pretty bad so far this weekend. So it will be commented on. To quote those who say "get over it", I say, get over people commenting on it.
  19. sue replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Classic case of player looking at opponent rather than ball. Worst free I’ve seen for a long time
  20. sue replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I feel dirty
  21. These commentators would be annoying if you didn’t want to know the scores in the AFL match. Don’t they realise that anyone watching the match is capable of looking up the AFL score whenever they want.
  22. It’s happening in the AFL too
  23. sue replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Actually we don’t really know who’ll be available next week, do we.
  24. sue replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    So no info on the extent of the injury?
  25. sue replied to Lucifers Hero's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Calm down DD. As a so called parent I wasn’t criticising him personally. Just a general comment about young adults and the improved long distance communication that is available these days. Which increases the chances of him being happy living ‘remotely’. As you say we don’t know anything about his particular circumstances.