-
NON-MFC: Round 02
So make a mess of the fixture by inventing Round 0 and the mess causes more mess.
-
sue started following Steven King meet & greet , NON-MFC: Round 02 , POSTGAME: Rd 01 vs St. Kilda and 4 others
-
2026 MRO & Tribunal
Justice must be done and SEEN to be done. If the AFL had any integrity it would try to find a Chair of the AFL Tribunal who isn't so clearly tied to a club as Gleeson is. Admittedly it may be difficult to find someone with a feel for the game who hasn't some sort of ties to a particular club. But Gleeson is too involved. Maybe an ex-player who played for several clubs?
-
POSTGAME: Rd 01 vs St. Kilda
Thank god for that. I never read the game day thread
-
PRESEASON TRAINING: Tuesday 10th March 2026
Not surprised you haven't. That's because concert organisers have more taste and respect for why the audience is there than the AFL does.
-
The New Rules?
Agree, a big disadvantage especially with the speed of the game and the lack of calling the player with the ball to start from an appropriate spot. I've always wondered what would be the result if umpires did not have to call play on but instead left the decision to the player on the mark. Penalise if they got it wrong, do nothing if they got it right.
-
The New Rules?
What are supporters feelings about the new rules? One that has irked me is the implemention of the stand rule when the man on the mark is often called to stand when he is nowhere near the mark (and when the player with the ball can start from almost anywhere). I'm pleased to see that Luke Beveridge complained about that last night where he said it gave Brisbane an advantage leading to a goal. (He could afford to complain having won the game.) Re the lasso rule - I wonder if its introduction should make the 'insufficient intent' rule redundant. That would give the umpires one less mind-reading task to do and allow for mis-kicks. Currently I feel they often interpret mis-kicks as insufficient intent rather than insufficient skill and ignore pressure on the kicker. (I note there is no insuffcient intent for shepherding a ball going out between the arcs.)
- Kayo digital membership
- Kayo digital membership
-
Kayo digital membership
I have whinged elsewhere that at ball ups after goals, Fox/Kayo/7 had been replaying players celebrating goals and confining the actual ball up to a small inset. The AFL introduced a new ruck rule to make the ball up contests more spectacular and their broadccasters aren't showing it properly (and sometimees not at all). Ridiculous. Watching the GWS/Hawks game on Kayo I was pleasantly surprised to see that we got to see the ball thrown up in full screen mode. Has the AFL woken up or was that an aberration?
-
Make an outlandish prediction for 2026
The AFL changed the centre bounce rule because the ruck clash would look far more spectacular. I predict that by Round 1 the AFL will force FOX/7/Kayo to actually show the ball up properly in full screen every time. They often show full screen repeats of players celebrating etc with the ball up only in a small box at the bottom right. And sometimes they even miss that. And to be totally outrageous, I predict they will show the positioning of players before the ball up for more than a microsecond.
- Kayo digital membership
-
NON-MFC: 2026 Opening Round
During practice matches the telecast often missed a centre "bounce" by playing a replay. I hoped this wouldn't continue but tonight they missed the first "bounce" of the season!! Grrrr!
-
Kayo digital membership
good question. You'd have to hope they are only doing it where they detected use by 2 IP addresses at or near the same time. (Don't drive home from work too fast.) I live in NSW and use Kayo at home. I'll be in interstate for some rounds this year, including round 1. I'll be [censored] off if I have to jump through hoops to use Kayo.
-
Steven King meet & greet
Panrty. Being full of sugar and salt it does not go off. So why would you put cold sauce on your hot pie if you don't have to?
-
2026 Injury List
I haven't followed this. What is the rationale for club's having to provide injury reports at all? Is it just for the gambling industry? If so, it would be about the only area where fairness is of any concern to the AFL.