-
Posts
3,451 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Everything posted by buck_nekkid
-
For sale: One microwave. Holds one membership card. Purchased from Richmond supporter 12 months ago. Reason for sale: Can’t see it being used in the medium to long term...
-
Not necessarily. Think that there is the for and against points columns. If they are on 120%, then the ratio is For:Against = 1.2:1. If they get a score that is more that 1.2:1, then their percentage can go up. If they win, but get less, this can go down. So, consider a match score 126 points to 100: this is 126% However, at the end of a long season, 1903:1514 is their current percentage of 125.6% 2026:1614 (126:100 victory) would give them a percentage of 125.5% . Ther size of the against number also has an impact on the outcome. So a 126:50 win is a 252% win, and their percentage goes up to 129.5%. Late in the season you need big results to gain or lose moderate percentage amounts.
-
Spargo was actually pretty good. I agree that Trac had a quietish game. I would have given Spargo more votes head to head. Oliver is an absolute gem. Fritta had an average game, although he played some important moments (running back into the back 50 to slow the Eagles fast break) Weidemann did really well - applied pressure, took some marks, made contests. Think he did more than enough to hold his place. No change, unless someone pulls up too sore. Most even umpiring I have seen in a Perth match - can we have these guys as ins for next week too?
-
Did anyone suggesting Bugg watch him yesterday? Complete turnover merchant. He would have to do considerably better to get a look in.
-
Goody said it was about if it was a mark or not.
-
Awesome. When we were behind, we shut it down, won the contest and won the game. We even knew how to ice it. Lessons learned and demonstrated
- 543 replies
-
- 16
-
Box Hill Hawks v Casey Demons - Round 20
buck_nekkid replied to KC from Casey's topic in Melbourne Demons
And that doesn’t tell the tale of it. Bugg was instrumental in turning the ball over to their advantage or score more than anyone. looks like stats for half a game... -
Gawd, 15 hrs until game time. after the results on the weekend, we need: 4 premiership points a clean bill of health otherwise my week will be totally screwed. dees by 14 points
-
Box Hill Hawks v Casey Demons - Round 20
buck_nekkid replied to KC from Casey's topic in Melbourne Demons
We are missing a number of players through injury that rob Casey of some quality straight away. It was also a terrible game for the club. It takes a big list to hold a firsts and a seconds together for a full season. If you dont read too much into today, then we have a few ‘developers’, a few ’plodders’ and a few undecideds on our list. No one today really put their hand up for promotion, and a few put their hands up for getting their card stamped. Depth is a big issue, particularly in midfield, outside run and rucks. I think we have a few good backmen, and DJ looks to be OK as the Nev Jetta apprentice. There are some definite items on the shopping list for the trade and draft period. -
Box Hill Hawks v Casey Demons - Round 20
buck_nekkid replied to KC from Casey's topic in Melbourne Demons
Wow. Lockhart, Corey Wagner, Petty (especially early), The rookie (Freeman?) malchia and maybe Dion Johnson get passes. Keilty maybe in this group, but not enough impact. Nufty votes go to the rest, Garlett #1, Bugg turnover merchant, Flipper -one tackle. King rucked but beaten. Josh Wagner - nowhere near a recall. Casey boys made an effort, but the problems were team wide. -
Box Hill Hawks v Casey Demons - Round 20
buck_nekkid replied to KC from Casey's topic in Melbourne Demons
VFL commentary team better than AFL idiots on seven -
Box Hill Hawks v Casey Demons - Round 20
buck_nekkid replied to KC from Casey's topic in Melbourne Demons
Looking lazy and tired -
Box Hill Hawks v Casey Demons - Round 20
buck_nekkid replied to KC from Casey's topic in Melbourne Demons
Bugg turnover leads to their goal. JUST POOR -
Box Hill Hawks v Casey Demons - Round 20
buck_nekkid replied to KC from Casey's topic in Melbourne Demons
3rd quarter huddle should be audible from Perth. Fumbly, beaten inside and outside, running second. Not what we are used to seeing. Bugg turnovers costly. Only a few players offering anything redeeming. No one pushing for a seniors spot in round 23. -
Box Hill Hawks v Casey Demons - Round 20
buck_nekkid replied to KC from Casey's topic in Melbourne Demons
And that was worse... -
Box Hill Hawks v Casey Demons - Round 20
buck_nekkid replied to KC from Casey's topic in Melbourne Demons
Man, that was BAD -
Good viewing. Lots of space for him to share his story. Good luck to him.
-
Thing I’m most looking forward to? People letting go of this camp thing. Honestly, if it was going to be the difference, wouldn’t the players queue up to go? What specifically would they have learned or developed on a weekend away that would change what they are doing now? Game specific composure and experiencing close game conditions aren’t found up a mountain.
-
Honestly, that Umpiring was shameful. I didn’t give a rats toss about the game, but the umpiring was perhaps the worst and most blatant I have ever seen. Conspiracy theorists can have a field day. That made the whole comp looked like a rigged shill game.
-
Match Preview and Team Selection - Round 22
buck_nekkid replied to Demonland's topic in Melbourne Demons
Good changes. Play Charlie closer to goal. Looks like we have a chance with this squad. -
If we beat Meth Coast I will ...
buck_nekkid replied to Bleeds_Red_&_Blue's topic in Melbourne Demons
swear a lot less in the 24 hours after the game. I think I set a new record after the Swans game. -
Given where our list is at, one or two 'A graders' shy of where we want to be, and knowing: We have seen considerable development in a number of players this year like Harmes, Salem etc. Spargo and Fritsch have had immediate impact Oscar Baker is developing at Casey, and could be an outside ball hero for us with the right development. We have some structural holes (back up ruck) that are screaming out for attention - will Bradtke be this?? How far away?? We have some players with large unfulfilled potential (Trac for example, Getting Viney on the park, Getting more from Hogan, etc etc) A few players are probably ready to be retired, or to shift back to Casey type roles Gaff looks like a good get, but do we want to join the bargain shoppers on this one? Somehow I doubt it. We make a reasonable offer regardless what North offer and stick to it. Our big get was Jake Lever last year. I don't know who else we would want that is available, and unless we are going to 'wiggle someone loose', we may have to give up more than we want to so that we can get what we want.
-
What really gets me is not only the discrepancy, but the where and when. Gifted frees to get them out of trouble from the back line, or even worse, cheapies one kick from goal. We will get a few 'marks as frees' (coulda paid the mark, but awarded a soft free instead), and some evener uppers on the wings. We wont be dealing with a 'Dangerwood/Dusty factor', but only crowd influence and expectation that the Eagles are #2 on the ladder. I expect them to get longer to dispose of the ball, have much bigger backs and longer necks, have the ability to handpass one handed and to make minimal illegal contact with Melbourne players. After square up, 26-14 in the frees. Costing us 3.1
-
If we don't make the finals, I will be bloody disappointed, and I'm sure the club will be, too. The failure will come because they haven't met 'expectation'. I will also be disappointed if we make the finals without winning any more games by a quirk of statistics or whatever. My expectation is that they should start to be a 'contender' and be able to beat all comers. We are close, but we are not there yet. I think they have shown a vast improvement this year, and the outcomes that they have achieved are well above anything I have seen from the group for a number of years. They are significantly better. I am not an apologist, I demand a lot from the group by virtue of the expectations I place on them. However, I can see the difference between failure to reach a nominal goal and the actual value of the outcomes achieved. The biggest failure will be our inability to finish off top ranked teams. This is a mixture of composure, skill and class. These three elements have not been hallmarks of Melbourne sides for a dozen years, so our essentially young group have to experience it, and learn it. If we don't find an opportunity to experience it in the last 2 games then how are we really going to learn it? This is where we will have failed - putting ourselves in situations where we could gain valuable (winning) experiences, and failing to capitalise. Once it is experienced, then it has to become a practiced habit. This is what every team on the rise has done - crack a big win, learn how to do it, and believe that they can. We have cracked an occasional win (Richmond and Hawks last year) but we have really learned nothing from it in terms of composure or skill.
-
Match Preview and Team Selection - Round 22
buck_nekkid replied to Demonland's topic in Melbourne Demons
B: Neville Jetta, Oscar McDonald, Jordan Lewis HB: Christian Salem, Sam Frost, James Harmes ? Alex Neal-Bullen, Clayton Oliver, Angus Brayshaw HF: Charlie Spargo, Sam Weideman, Aaron vandenBerg F: Michael Hibberd, Tom McDonald, Dom Tyson Foll: Max Gawn, Nathan Jones, Christian Petracca I/C (from): Dean Kent, Jake Melksham, Mitch Hannan, Cameron Pedersen, Jay Kennedy Harris, Bayley Fritsch, Jeff Garlett, Josh Wagner In: Hibberd, Kent, Melksham, Hannan, Weideman, Wagner Out: Hogan (foot), Hunt (ankle)