beelzebub

need to be able to take a contested mark for that possie

Hungry should stick to golf. Hes done more than most to bugger up footy

you do realise you posted an entiirely too logical post.Either desist or pre empt with a warning. Caution: Logic to follow

Ouch. Feel free to create threadspolls about the others. Some ive actuaaly suggested as trades in other threads. This ones about Jack . Cheers

has been a long season ManDee...the shine well and truly worn off !!

Some good points. those that butcher it worse will hopefully be moved on, or educated if able. No one , I would suspect actually denies the ability of Jack in some situations. His effort to create a goal out of nothing in the 3rd I think was brilliant and had he more confidence in his body he might well have pulled it off. reality is its few and far between. I keep asking myself , why dont ppl kick it to Jack ? he is the best link thinker on the team imho, which even more confounds the situation. But you can have all the smarts going and if no one wants to include you or if you cant impose on the game then it will all come to nought. This poll is about where this board ( DL ) sees Jack, today and tomorrow. Ultimately its only what the club thinks that will matter. welcome to the nut house

I wonder if Roos already conceded we are likely spooners and #2 is the tradable pick..ie a PP if granted... not our FIRST pick

How many other players OUCH do you think from MFC might be on anyones shopping list ??...Be a short list The reason he gets a thread unlike many others is that few players of recent times have polarised this club like Jack.

why ? answer all q's ??

that and hed garner the most interest...and price.

couldnt hurt could it !!

Acquisition of talent to help clubs........ ( fox ) for those not paying the Hun

I did notice on the odd occasion Dawesy came right up the ground he had no real problem marking a ball. he can mark. Hes good at fumbling when pressured but I reckon 9/10 ppl would , with that much attention

show me where it states Jack Watts is the sole cause of our malaise?? Where I created the thread to in fact concentrate on his worth and future at the MFC. To allow other Demonlanders to express via a poll what they feel is the better discourse. Again if you cant isolate and critique one player then youd have a hard job in list management Id guess. You dont think the club dont do EXACTLY this ?

what ?? Thats the whole bloody point !!! Of course its a thread about a single player. Its "A PLAYER" thats traded or whatever edit ...hardly unfair... any player can be focused upon. The interest however is Watts

The reasoning behind some trades is they are contracted so thats how we move them on. Some trading is done with pick exchanges and a sweetener. It might happen some are at the end of contract so wont be traded

We need to improve the list. This can be incremental and /or wholesale as ability to , and opportunities present. A lot of those who apologise for Watts will continually point and deflect elsewhere as a defence. What about this bloke, or that. He's not the only one etc etc etc. How about we just focus on Jack here and understand what HIS worth is to this side going forward. If he needs to be continually propped up or 'catered' to then thats just garbage especially at AFL . Sometimes I wonder , if he played any more "outside' hed be sitting next to me in the stand !!

Yes...hes playing the market a bit....good on him. G;lad hes on our side

getting slow in your old age there WYL

yep, got me sold !!!

NO, that exists !!

We all know Evan's real views on equalisation..

A possible snag in our endeavours to get a PP will be how palatable will it be for all others should we finish last and if ( lol ) Frawley goes we get a band 1 compo ? There is no way in this lifetime we could ever get 1, 2 and 3. Though we need them. Either a PP or compo will have to be at the round 1 to even get off the floor not sure who's activating what banked pick but hypothetically if we were to finish last . Wed have Pick 1, possibly pick 2 ( as compo ) pick 19 (or thereabouts ) and maybe a PP at 20...and 38 etc 1, 2, 19, 20, 38, 56

This is the odd thing WJ..if they dont penalise correctly , WADA will step in anyways. Who's trying to kid who here.

funny thing is the talk is of #2 were likely to have #1 also the way were going 2 would be tempting , big time