wisedog

Is there any way Tomlinson holds his place when Petty returns? I suppose there simply isn’t a position left for him - unless we tried him as a forward. And honestly, at this point, it seems as good a suggestion as any. I don’t really know how often he was played as a KPF at GWS. From what I gather he was played mainly as a wingman - although he did kick 9 goals at the end of 2018. If somehow, he rose to the challenge like McDonald in 2015? it would also give us the flexibility of having a capable defender to cover any mid-game injuries to Petty, May or Lever. Wishful thinking. Either way, I hope we at least bring back a tall forward. IN: Petty, Oliver OUT: Bedford, Sparrow

I think one of the reasons we hold out hope for Sam were his performances at the end of 2018 season - the finals in particular. Elimination final against the Cats is by far his best game. 24 disposals, 7 marks, 3 goals, 4 tackles, 1 HO He’s athletic and mobile and comfortable playing up the ground. IF Luke Jackson is to leave, perhaps Weidemann serves the club best by working on his ruck craft over the Summer and taking over this role. Given Gawn’s recent comments about his best position being a ruck/forward it’s probably his best opportunity to extend his career in a meaningful way. I like Sam. The way the players talk about him suggest he doesn’t have a mean bone in his body - and perhaps that’s part of the problem.

IN: JVR, Laurie, Hunt OUT: Bowey, Bedford, Spargo From reports, JVR has outperformed Weideman over the last two weeks at Casey. If we’re at the point of playing three small forwards ahead of Mitch Brown or Weideman, then we really have nothing to lose. Laurie also seems to have earned his opportunity. Eager to see what these two can do.

Massively satisfying win. It genuinely felt like every marginal decision would be called or not called in Adelaide’s favour. Has there ever been a player as likeable as Tex Walker? When he started leaning into tackles like Weightman, it took my affection to a whole new level. - Petracca looking much more confident and dynamic. -Langdon’s run was massively important responding to Adelaide in the last quarter.

This is the season defining game. We've had a really bad run lately - leaks from the top, senior players punching on, contract delays with Jackson and 3 losses in a row to top 8 sides. The media is keen to push the narrative of the season coming off the rails. During our 10 game streak, I was quietly hoping we would drop a few games, simply to allow the side to recalibrate and and surge towards the end of the season. I also felt it would be incredibly difficult for us to sustain mentally. Having said that, the losses have gone beyond what I was expecting, and we desperately need to right the ship. So this week I can handle a close loss, particularly if we look to be working through our issues forward of centre. However a bad loss would be devastating as we dispatched the Lions easily last season. It will really be undeniable indication of where we're at. Out: Turner, Gawn In: Weid, May Whatever the result, I predict an absolutely massive game from Viney. His on field leadership in the absence of Gawn will be huge.

Out: M Brown Turner Sparrow In: Weid May Hunt Weid playing higher up the ground. Ben Brown close to goals. We simply have to make this work. They are the most experienced and the most capable. I don’t think we can afford to experiment with defenders or throw a teenager down there and expect him to hold down a key position for the remainder of the season and finals. Ben Brown and Weid are our best options and they need to figure out how to play together and play within the team. Salem as the best field kick in the side higher up the ground too - given the abysmal entries into the F50 recently. Brayshaw stays in defence. Hunt on a wing. The fringe players pre-2021 seem to be reverting. Harmes, ANB, Sparrow, Hunt all took a big step last season but haven’t looked like it recently. I don’t know what can be done about that but I’m relieved this is happening now and not round 17. We have time but we absolutely need a plan.

The greatest relief is the timing. We know the bones of the side are the best in the league. We have 10 weeks to find the right combination and for key players to find form. If I were an opposition supporter, I’d be annoyed this slump occurred now and not later in the season. The forward line is a big concern. We badly need Ben Brown to perform as he did at the end of 2020 - the question is whether you allow him to find form at Melbourne or Casey. This time last season, Weidemann and Brown were trading places and it looks like the same thing is happening. If McDonald is a longterm injury the equation is different and I wonder if Weidemann would play more freely if he knew his place in the side wasn’t so vulnerable. (Obviously, not the ideal mindset for an elite athlete). Petty seemed to drift to CHF last night and seemed comfortable: Perhaps not the answer but worth experimenting with in the same way we did with Tom McDonald 4-5 years ago. IN: Weidemann, May, Hibberd OUT: B Brown, M Brown, Hunt

Interesting after following this club for over 25 years how different it feels to be a Melbourne supporter right now. It's great to have success, but the success has also given rise to a new feeling - relevance. In the weeks after the Grand Final when I overheard footy conversations, I was struck that people not only knew the names of our players - but to hear the WAY they spoke about our players. To hear them speak about Petracca, Oliver and Gawn with that same reverence usually reserved for the likes of Judd, Ablett and Dangerfield, is not something I was used to. We've had many great players in my time supporting Melbourne, but I felt I always had to make a case for them and whatever I said about Yze, Robertson or Neitz would always be met with dubious eye rolls. Increasingly, Melbourne players are front and centre of newspapers, referenced in commercials and random media snippets, celebrities who never seemed to be footy fans are suddenly loud and proud Melbourne supporters. Obviously, this can't go on forever. And these stars will eventually retire, but I sincerely hope that something from this period can be captured and embedded into the fabric of the Club for a long time to come - so even when we do fall down the ladder, we know what it takes to climb up again and know we will. There is no real blueprint to attaining this level of success - it's really that mysterious thing we loosely refer to as 'culture'. It instructs people what to do and what to expect without having to say it. It's probably one of the most important thing there is.

I became a father a few weeks ago. Baby and a Granny in the same year. I think I need to consult an astrologist. I had to wait 34 years for a flag. This kid only had to wait 8 weeks!

I’d like to acknowledge my uncle Philip Thompson. He loved Melbourne dearly. When I was a boy we talked about Melbourne often. What I realise now is they were probably the first conversations with an adult where I didn’t feel like I was being talked down to. You wanted me to feel at ease and to hear what I had to say. That really is the epitome of a gentleman. You’re dearly missed Phil and I know you and Charles were with us in spirit.

I would hate to lose to Geelong more than GWS. But I would also take greater pleasure in beating Geelong. Losing to Geelong would be a souring footnote to the round 23 win and it would change the way I think about that game. As it was probably my happiest sporting experience in recent memory I sincerely hope that doesn’t happen. But part of me also says that’s a defeatist frame of mind. We should want to play the best team and expect to win. And we are that good that we should expect to win.

I remember a few years ago Taylor Walker trained in an Indigenous guernsey out of solidarity with Eddie Betts after he was abused by a spectator. It seemed like empty virtue signalling at the time and that appears to be the case. Reminds me of Eddie Maguire taking the AFL to task for allowing Tom Jones to sing Delilah at the Grand Final... only to then publicly joke about drowning Caroline Wilson.

I was disappointed Fritsch didn’t take the set shot late in the last. From memory we were a goal in front as he lined up. Even if he kicked a behind it would have probably been enough to get the win. It was a bit of worrying result but I’m probably more relieved than disappointed. The footy world wouldn’t have let us live it down if we lost and the 2 points will be important at the end of the year.

Anyone who grew up in male environments knows this sort of thing is pretty common. It's obviously an in-joke and I have no real issue with the act itself. However, as others have said, I would expect far greater professionalism on match day and given the way we dropped the ball in the 4th quarter, it's easy to connect the disrespect shown towards the coach and our performance. But surely, if there is a story here it's not about consent or predatory behaviour, the story is why it's a joke for straight males to pretend to have homosexual interests? To be clear, this isn't something that worries me (unless Twitter decides it's something that should worry me) I'm just surprised that angle hasn't been covered yet.

My initial reaction was that the claims don't quite seem plausible: This isn't the usual defensiveness of a white middle-class male, I just don't understand how systematic racial abuse of a player could occur in this day and age. I went to an all-boys school in a regional town and even there, I can't imagine anything like this occurring. These young men grow up idolising athletes from the NBA, NFL and play alongside Indigenous players. How could they possibly still hold such backward ideas? This isn't even taking into account the measures put in place by the AFL educate players. However, these are strong claims and it's equally hard to believe there isn't at least a kernel of truth to them. Surely by now, there are dozens of former Gold Coast players and support staff without any strong ties to the club who would be able to corroborate such claims. And if not, surely someone honourable enough to give an honest appraisal of the situation. I would suggest Gary Ablett, but that would also suggest his leadership wasn't strong enough to put a stop to the behaviour.

Thoughts on Syrian strikes? A slap on the wrist in the scheme of this war but anything other than a slap may have been catastrophic. It breaks with his narrative about US interests in the Middle East and has hurt his support among right commentators.

I understand that. And I was never particularly open about my support for Abbott. It just wasn't worth the number of barroom arguments I would have to endure. I had multiple arguments with my girlfriend over the years who would tell me he made her skin crawl. So we just decided to avoid the topic. It would be an interesting study to see why so many people arrive at their opinions with such striking consistency - without any kind of manifesto or for that matter any kind of collaboration. The term 'group think' is very much apt. My Dad is from England and he would often retell a quote by someone or other. "If I'm at a dinner party and someone tells me where they stand on fox hunting... I can tell you where they stand on everything!" But I'm not saying this is only a phenomenon of the Left. I can just as easily see people reading Bolt and allowing their views to be bent in accordance.

Abbott always seemed to me like a genuine man. I liked him and was actually very disappointed when Malcom 'born to rule' Turbnull knocked him over. It seemed there was a characterisation of Abbott that was peddled by the press gallery but the real man was someone different. He was just too awkward and old fashioned to know how to counter their tactics. I think it was very telling to hear Warren Mundine say, and I paraphrase, "The more you got to know him and the more you worked with him, the more you liked him." As for Rudd, he said the opposite. I think Abbott was confronted by an extraordinarily hostile media who barely even bothered to disguise their loathing for him. His brand of conservatism was anathema to them. However... while he did kick a few goals, he was ultimately a disappointment. What does he do now? He seems to have no purpose and no friends in the world except Andrew Bolt. Even his former allies in Cormann, Frydenberg and Dutton have turned their backs. He could join Bernadi's Conservatives... perhaps better to go quietly into the night. He'd actually be a good war time Prime Minister. So when Trump blows everything up, he may be useful.

But the question on everyone's lips is what word am I using to describe Trump that keeps getting censored? It really could be any number of things.

He won't ever have the eloquence of Obama. But he's something of a story teller in his own way. I have to admit to you I've occasionally despaired of the human race to realise someone so uncouth could occupy the highest office in the world. And yet, as indicated above... I'm more inclined to judge the aforementioned [censored] by the results. As much of a [censored] as he is; he was clever enough to smash the Republic establishment and beat Hilary. He's isolated himself from the CIA, the FBI - every Liberal news outlet in the country. He was a joke candidate who has cleared every hurdle placed in front of him and he's still running. All of this probably terrifies people and I understand that. But I'm not all that happy with the status quo - so I don't really mind watching an orange skinned gentleman nudge the apple cart. And for what it's worth, I do sense that at the end of all of this people might be pleasantly surprised. Feel free to bookmark this page and bump it when half the world is in ashes. I could be wrong, it wouldn't be the first time.

Definitely insecure. Some stupid. For sure. And yes, time will tell if the North Korea dialogue amounts to anything. But it's been acheived in no small part to unprecedented sanctions from Trump. And time will also tell if these tariffs are a monumental disaster for America. It may not be, certainly many conservatives think it will. It's all up in the air and there's something exciting about that, I think you'll agree. Exciting or terrifying given your emotional disposition. I'm quite sure Trump will get a second term, probably because all the stupid and insecure people like me. I stand by my post but I respect your opinions. I feel there would be many counter examples of the Obama-era: What would leftists say if Trump brought upon the chaos in Libya given their unanimous disapproval of Bush's incursion in Iraq. (Except from Christopher Hitchens). What would leftists say if Trump withdrew from Iraq and left the door open for unimaginable horrors. (Actually, that's what they always wanted, but it was still a F-ING DISASTER. LIKE PROBABLY ONE OF THE WORST F-ING THINGS TO HAPPEN THIS CENTURY). If I really racked my brains I could probably think of some more for you but I'm at work and felt I should probably respond in some way. Double standards are all part of the game. The point is, I don't feel Obama ever did anything of true significance. Other than present a modern face of America. And preharps that is significant. Anyway, I'm sure you're all good dudes. But I'm frustrated, even though I'm not from America, from my perspective, while it may seem nihilistic, I'm actually glad to see someone 'f-ing' with the system. And isn't it bizarre that people who hold these views align themselves to the Right these days... and not the left who would be the traditional home of rebels. Lefties are becoming very, very boring and it will probably be part of their undoing because so many of their followers are vain, vapid idiots. And so the vain, vapid idiots will drift to the right instead. The pendulum swings and swings. All the best.

I consider myself a moderate - but I'm more in Wrecker's camp in that I'm deeply uncomfortable with the group think that pervades the left - that there are these new prescribed opinions that we mus hold. Most of you may think that consensus preached by the political elites is better than alternatives; that it does more good than harm and that's fine. In some ways I agree with you, but I'm sick of watching careers ruined because of slight verbel missteps, I'm sick of watching rich, inner suburbs types or for that matter, Hollywood types pose as men and women of the people when they couldn't be further from that. I'm sick of feeling ashamed because I was born male and white. What I loved about Trump - and he is a massive [censored], there's no question about that. What I loved about Trump is that he showed how powerful it can be to ignore the authority of the political media, instead of backing down and looking shame faced, he stuck to his guns and never apologised. When Abbot reinstituted knighthoods and there was a massive backlash - one of the many hits he took that led to his downfall. If he took a leaf out of Trumps book and said... "Fu you. This is our history. It shouldn't have been removed to begin with. There are knighthoods conferred in Canada and Northern Europe and it's a great thing." Instead he was shamed out of his decision. and why would anyone follow you if you won't fight for the idea you came up with? I feel that this was the secret to Trump's success and a really signigicant development that others who's views aren't represented by the political left will learn from. He never backed down, in the face of insummountable NBC editorials or Twitter hashtags. (Except for when he made those dispariging comments about Ted Cruz's wife... but as I said... he's a [censored].) As for his policies, there was dog whistling of course, but while he carries on like an imbecile, he's turning things on their head and getting results. Jobs - a dialogue with North Korea. I look at Obama and I think, what the f did you actually do? It's like your presidency was just a massive American PR exercise. Obama... I like him. He was probably the president we needed after George Bush. And thank f it wasn't Hilary. Anyway, I love all you guys and value your thoughts about football and jazz and the like. But I wanted to put in my two cents. But upon looking over this disatribe, I see it's far more than two cents and I'm sorry for subjecting you to it.

Began a bit of a jazz odyssey last year. I found you sort of have to let the music wash over you rather than listen to actively like pop or rock. I also enjoyed going into record shops and picking up CD's without really knowing what I was going to find - just looking at the personnel and knowing who I liked. And there is really too much to every really get through. They were seriously prolific musicians back then. The first person I really looked into was Bill Evans - I was immediately drawn to the piano in Blue in Green on Miles Davis' Kind of Blue. (Bill Evans famously complained about the lack of credit for what was largely his composition. I believe in place of royalties, Davis offered him a $20 note he had in his wallet.) Evans was a chronic alcoholic and drug user, whose life was described as the "longest suicide note in history". Like a lot of white rappers these days (who are far less talented) he faced a lot of criticism from black audiences, who felt he was intruding on their own art form. But ultimately, he was one of the very greatest and distinctive jazz pianists from a golden era and made a very significant contribution.

Condolences, DD! What a gorgeous boy he was. Always think of this video in times like these. RIP Neville.