Sir Why You Little

Coaches have argued that losing a Player puts more load back on the 17 uninjured players This is their rule. Make no mistake. We have bought back a rule that was thrown out, because it was ineffective and the players hated it

Medical Insurance Bills i am guessing But the Sub aint the answer Sit back and watch

“Injury Sub” it will be SEN Whately How long till this is exploited and made to look silly....? The Sub rule has already been with us and it was thrown out by the players

It’s more to do with the Medical Insurance, i have no doubt. i get that, but adding a sub is not the answer. Coaches will exploit this rule this year and Players will dislike it big time, because they don’t always get a run. i hope the AFL are realizing all this, which is why a decision hasn’t been given yet. It is a huge can of worms

I saw Gill speak last night. It is a joke The interchange bench was increased to 4 to cover injuries This rule will be rorted within this season

Yes i have my fingers crossed Macca but Germany is about to Lockdown again, so we can only hope closed sets are hard to manage

It’s wonderful, just carries on seamlessly

Robbo completely forgets what he was saying mid sentence i saw the show last night. He is an embarrassment to all of us who enjoy the game

I am talking about individual players. Soft tissue injuries will happen to these subs and then the Players Union will cherp up why i say this is because we have already had the subs before, it’s not as if we are trying this for the first time. it failed once already. Has the AFL made a decision today? I haven’t seen anything, it’s been a fairly big news day!!!

Best thing the Club did over Summer was get this Bloke. Heard him interviewed last year on SEN one afternoon, talking about his Kicking Classes. The interview was at least 20 minutes. you could feel how passionate he was about getting it right. He is a teacher and we need that

Pity we are not part of it

No it isn’t. Players will sit there for the whole game if there are no concussions. and how many players will sit on the bench for 95% of the game. Get subbed on and injure themselves because they were stagnant sitting for too long. it will happen the Game had 2 Reserve Players for 100 years and now has 4. We have already had Subs and it was halted

But we have already had Subs, and it was a situation the Players hated. The AFL got rid of it...

Just take a look at those 2 games in Cairns. the Team just expected to win.. Even against Bottom Sides, you still have to work hard as a unit to win. The MFC fails to do that so often, year after year.

He is not wrong MFC Players have not achieved anything yet. Malthouse did.

You don’t rate Hardwick Don’t sugarcoat it Goodwin is way behind Hardwick

Concussions are not a new injury Why the knee jerk reaction Teams are also disadvantaged when a Player does a knee, but we don’t have sub for that (yet)

Next we will have a Hammy Sub...

Pathetic Just so predictable

Why should anyone from outside the Club trust The MFC? We collapse when real Pressure is applied. Happens every year

It’s a major disruption to certain players career. Certain players will be “Subs” It has already been tried. The Players said NO Do we have subs if Players do an ACL? Concussion is a by-product of a very brutal sport

If a player is concussed during play. They are off for the day. Man down. subs don’t work we already know this subs sitting on the bench waiting for a concussion will not work. They are not match fit and therefore are disadvantaged

I have to get a ticket to get into the MCC Reserve what a disgrace!!!

What a ridiculous idea. Subs do not work, we already know this They are really not that smart at HQ Concussion is the same as an injury The team is a man down

This is not a matter of “gawk” I am sure there is some communication between the 2 camps. The Storm “get it”, they get it every year The Demons don’t, it goes in one ear and out the other different games entirely, but the work ethic and application are the same, towards working as a Team