daisycutter

there is debate as to whether this refers just to within the nd or whether it includes Trade period + ND if the former then we could trade back pick 22

....and a good tolerance to hard liquor, ernie

i believe it's about 3.25M over 5 years averaging 650k

probably be rested for hawks, but

written by jay clark but mainly quoting sumich - pm'd ya

ahhh, you mean poma, now i get it you'd be no fun in a funicular then, biffo?

gold coast well and truly shafted by carlscum, who value martin so highly on a contract basis but not on a trade basis only hope is gold coast match his demand just to prove a point. afl can back them with a little help somewhere.

yep, musta got early parole

hill went to the aints......duh

do the states have father/son, academies, point values and 20% discounts?

many sociopaths and psychopaths do very well in psychological testing ............just saying

normal greek footwear. but obviously not when in egypt

who in their right mind would want thick woolen socks in egypt?

think you'll get some disagreement on that claim.........anyway, no way we have a chance

that is mostly true, but there are still other considerations, even if somewhat nominal

except od, mr leg. he's not drinking enough malt whiskey or eating enough bananas

they (afl) need more money for the aflw going into the future (just like in cricket australia)

never said he was ignorant of it. he (claims) had no part in it, advised against it and wrote letter to mgmt saying so. but.....he stopped there and took no further actions, despite being the senior club doctor (with a medical duty of care)

hope so

well the doc was not guilty by commission, but probably was by omission (depending on your viewpoint)

i'd agree with that, but at least this year they will allow it. and agree next year especially, could be a complete fiasco if no changes made. otoh they can still do a lot of similar similar pick switching in the trade period to avoid paying proper price

but notice from the preceding post "Though the league approved of Sydney's move last year, they have informally notified list managers this week at the Gold Coast that they will not be able to employ the same strategy during this year's draft." this implies there is no formal afl rule, which allows the afl to interpret on the fly (surprise, surprise). i'd expect they would only apply the new rule in the same situation as last year including it being just during the draft night (unless something really looked obvious and smelly and deliberately setup during trade time to circumvent new rule ) . if a pick from trade time got traded back during draft night and it was obviously innocuous i suspect they'd let it go.

brodie sounds such a collingwood name

how long has jonesy been wearing a yarmulke?

i would have said i want the lot