daisycutter

it's only lvl 2 members at 1pm lvl 1 members at 3pm non reserved seat members at 5pm

what's the truth then, dazzle, i'm curious

i take back the 12 and now make it 14, as travis said google maps shows 12 block equivalent plus 2 adjacent normal size blocks but when you look at the satellite picture those 2 blocks are now part of the bentleigh club car park

no hurry yet, uncle. there has lately been a large influx of oriental bluerinsers in burwood which is proving a delightful and rewarding challenge. i'm sure you can appreciate my reluctance to move on at this time

when i was a kid i often found i was surrounded by home team fanatics, but i always thought they'd never beat up a kid so i used to barrack as hard as i could. luckily it seemed to work for me despite a few scary moments i wasn't till i was much older and wiser that i realised fanatic bummer fans would kill their own children if it would ensure a win, and how lucky i was in truth, to attain my majority in one piece

well i'll toss in for 12 blocks. if you look over the road at yawla st it lines up exactly with 6 block frontages now of course it all depends how one defines a block. Is it the traditional 700m2 block or the latest trendy 300m2 if you're lucky block i also have no idea what size those current blocks on yawla st are any other takers?

just like to point out that hit out to advantages don't necessarily equate to successful clearances just saying

re sparrow: he only had 50% time on ground......yet got 11 disposals, 5 tackles and of course that excellent 50m timely goal you couldn't drop him on that performance

is touching balls still banned?

i'd just add one thing re the game i thought the game was planned in pretty good spirit by the players there was no spite or melees and thugs out to intimidate like in a few other games over the weekend only big downer was the bummer fans and the umpires (as usual), plus the reduced number of tickets

agree with this i would have paid the goal despite the video being too fuzzy based on umpire decision stands i would pay goal if foot made contact whilst ball not completely over line i.e. ball still in play but this is just my opinion

i don't think the rules cover this situation precisely it's just a grey area and the afl should clarify it in the rules

i think the reason seems to be legal. i.e. people have a legal right to be not vaccinated (or to wait) and can't be forced or fired. seems strange to me in certain industries but that's what it seems to be

wasn't pig only on stringer when he was in fwd line. seemed to me stringer got a bit of midfield time and was more dangerous when he did

and you could add aged care workers......according to saturday age report an astonishing 2/3 are not vaccinated

he won't make that same mistake twice ?

20+% ??????

boy, didn't realise meth coast relied on the crowd that much.....dogs now 54 pts up and with bad goal kicking

but the weather forecast was well known when they bought the tickets i suspect saying it was a "sell-out" was just marketing talk

if we had kicked for goal just a little bit accurately we win by about 30 points there was a point there in 3q where we missed 3 fairly easy set shots in a row 44 i50s to their 33 back line may have won it bit fwd line had the opportunity to put it beyond question

forward delivery dumb.....sucks

that would be clarryfying?

and......no de goey oth they get back grundy and adams

i think i heard 1,000 spectators for local sporting matches.......but don't quote me

max's ruckwork has been down somewhat this year.....proof?......my eyes but that's not all bad......it just means he (and therefore the team) can still improve good times ahead?..........hopefully as for lack of talls in fwd line.......we did quite well for last part of 2018 without hogan