Vipercrunch

So if Green had thrown a punch and the umpire had ducked it, there would be. I thing to see? Horribly flawed logic there.

He was probably shocked that a player had just walked into him. If the tribunal give any credence to the non-report they would only be once again proving their incompetence.

I keep watching it and that is not at all what happens. Green does nothing to avoid the contact, he leans in if anything. The umpire is the only one who tries to avoid contact at the last second. Given the umpires was the one who was stationary, that is absurd.

The only reason the contact wasn’t more forceful was because the umpire moved. Toby did nothing to avoid the umpire and forced the umpire to move which is simply unacceptable. I thought 5-6 weeks on first viewing. I’d be ok with 3 but the AFL is weak when it comes to big name players at finals time.

You know the ones I'm talking about. Those 4 in the second quarter that Geelong kicked in about 1 and a half minutes of playing time. Those 4 that almost cost us the minor premiership. I remember myself getting very angry during that particular period because of what seemed at first watch to be several non-calls but until tonight I haven't had a chance to have a second look. I actually wondered if I had imagined the non-calls due to the peak excitement of the moment, but on closer examinination (using Kayo Slomo), I wasn't imangining anything. Goal 1 (~6:10 left on the clock) - A boundary throw in on Geelongs half forwardline. Clear throw by Selwood that a few disposals later ends in a Hawking goal. Was picked up in some media. Goal 2 (5:33 left on clock) - Danger runs 20m+ without bouncing then kicks the goal. It's well established that the width of the mowed stripes is 10m (check it for yourself using the 5 stripes from the 50m line to the goal line). He takes a mark right in the middle of a light green stripe, then plays on, running all the way to half through the next light green stripe (half a light, a full dark, then another half light), so easy to work out he ran at least 20m (he didn't run straight towards goal). Counting steps was harder because he puts in lots of fast small steps, but I count about 17 full running strides, which works out to about 22m. Goal 3 (5:25 left on clock) - Danger again runs 17-18m before handpassing which a for possesions later ends with Close(?) kicking the goal. Starts half way through the lighter green again and disposes 2 or 3m into the next light green stripe. Not a great deal over the 15m, but it still could/should have been called. Goal 4 (5:05 left on clock) - This one I'm far less certain of but it looks like a throw by Danger. 50:50 really. Rohan marks and goals in the same passage. 9 goals in a row was very worrying and still is, but we were desperately unlucky for at least 2 or 3 of them.

Surely he's not equating racially vilifiying somone (abusing someone about, and because of their race) with critisising someone about their performance who just happen to be white? Surely he's not that silly.

Whoever runs the WCE Facebook account has just told me that NicNat has made a statement on behalf of their club on Twitter today. Any Twitter uses care to confirm and share? Edit: It's a video that they have also been released on Facebook.

They can make comment condeming the comments without knowing if the person who made them is linked to the club. They may never know for sure but because the comments were made about a player WCE had just played against, there is more than enough reason for them to publicly condemn them.

I can't see any public statement out of WCE so far. If that is the actual case, extremely poor by them. As long as our society keeps giving platforms to people like Andrew Bolt, Alan Jones and Rita Panihi, racists will still think it's ok to speak their hateful thoughts out loud. I actually feel quite sorry for them. Imagine being so shallow and disconnected from the rest of humanity that you think it's ok.

The fact that even deciding who Melbourne's most important player is, is so difficult is an indication of our depth and hopefully resilience to cope if one of them was absent.

Our situation this year is very different to previously. Yes there is still plenty to do to position ourselves on the laddter, but we can do that without the same sort of pressure that exists when teams are just scambling to hopefully squeeze into the 8. I am all for becoming more conservative with leaving players out that are carrying things that rest will help (rest doesn't help every niggle) or resting players that are feeling the mental pinch as well. 8-0 is beginning to afford us a luxury that shouldn't be wasted. If you think the media will have plenty to say if we drop a game mid season because we rest a few players, just imagine what they'll say if we finish the year two games clear on top of the ladder and go out in straight sets because our players are all cooked becasue we mis-managed them mid season?

Clarry (35 possesions, 22 contested, 16 clearances) or #PositiveLingers (1000+ metres gained, 3 goals)

We have to keep looking at ways to get better and I think Melksham's role is definitely one role that we should look hard at. Chandler, Sparrow and Bedford should all be given a look in at some stage.

There is still room in footy for pure accidents and this was one of those. There was no time for a straight arm fend, so he went with a forearm fend, but the north player was stumbling so the forearm bounced off his shoulder into his chin. No time at all for Fritta to adjust, meaning he hadn't breached his duty of care. This was as straightforward decision as they come I reckon despite how bad it look in slow-mo.

The marking and goal-kicking I'll enjoy. I'll even be ok if he flops around a bit and milks some free-kicks, BUT I'll never be fine with that silly long run up, even if he does kick accurately. So unnecessary.

According to Angus in a post match interview last Saturday, this Melbourne side lick their lips when it rains, so no worries there. As long as the team remain focused and don't get ahead of themselves, they'll be ok.

I loved the amount of times our small forwards made telling plays on the last line of defence. A desperate tackle by ANB in Q1 and a spoil by Spargo on Lynch in Q2 come to mind.

You really should watch the replay in full bcause right now you look very silly. Kozzy was trying to make a lead when the Richmond player round-housed him and hit kozzy in the head with his arm. That was when kozzy retaliated. Luckily the umpires saw the initial high contacted and awared the free kick. During the wrestle, the tiger player was leaning on Kizzies face/head with his forearm which was got Jones wo riled up. Kozzy isn't a sniper at all. The tactics of the tiger overstepped the mark and he retaliated which is fair enough. The issue Goodwin had with him was the pointing at the scoreboard.

I will only ever call him Weeds. I will over think it otherwise.

Nathan Jones 300th Dusty Martins 250th It's rare to have both sides celebrating such huge milestones in the same game. How each side, but in particular how we, cope with that in addition to the blockbuster occasion will be another test of our developing maturity. The urge to play well for Jones will be there, but how it is harnessed positiviely will be key to the outcome. I'd love to be confident enough to tip Melbourne, but I can't bring myself to this week. ?? Tigers by 23

It's not meant to be "SheRmons" supporters, as in Sherman tanks is it?

Yes, we'd all love to win it, but Saturday night is not a must win game. A must win game against Richmond could come later in the year. Maybe we shouldn't give them a look at our forwardline with both BBB and Weeds in it. Let's give May another week so everyone knows they're not seeing our best defensive structure. Same with Fritta. The must do this week is for our midfield to withstand the Richmond pressure and to able to apply effective pressure of our own. In doing so, we will give Jones a milestone game he desserves, win or lose. Let's not give them a free look against our best forwards and backs. So maybe just the one change... IN: Weeds OUT M. Brown

That comment has way more to do with his potential than actual output so far. Opposition coaching groups wouldn’t be putting a heap of time into matching him up at the moment.

Not yet, but mainly because given the circumstances of the first 5 rounds, we really haven't played an oppisition of substance. All our oppisitons have either had pre-exisitng significant injuries, injuries on the day (GWS) or just been simply a poor side or a side in really bad form. Not the fault of the MFC, but it doesn mean I can't yet fully trust them.

I think we need to be very careful about when, and at what rate, we bring in players that have been out for long periods (Weeds and BBB etc) or unproven AFL players (Bedford, Chandler etc). Unless injury forces our hand, I'd hate us to bring in more than one of those types at a time, especially against a team like Richmond. The gulf in quality from VFL to AFL is bigger than ever thanks to Covid last year. A player dominating at VFL level could very well come in and struggle to get a kick at AFL level. If May and/or Fritta are fully fit and ready to go, bring them in. But definetely no more than one of Weeds/BBB/Bedford/anyone else who is pushing to come in too. At whose expense? I really don't know. I feel LJ could really, relly benefit from a multi-week run at Casey. Like, it would be best for his long term development type of benefit. But in doing so, do we lose too much of what he provides as back-up ruckman? Tough week to be a selector.