Jump to content

Redleg

Members
  • Posts

    25,588
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    120

Everything posted by Redleg

  1. Obviously the Manager or the Pies now feeding the Press. When it gets to disclosing the terms of his retirement package, we know it comes from the inside. No wonder Eddie didn't comment on Mitch, when he had the chance to. He knew what they were doing behind the scenes. The Pies are known as one of the difficult clubs to deal with at trade week.
  2. It wasn't a comment about Mitch, it was about Ross Lyon being a smart arse.
  3. Ok will see what is on the agenda next week.
  4. If you mean no one in the first round nominates him and then Saints don't with first pick in second round, then yes, he is at worst able to be taken in third round by us.
  5. A smart arse comment by Ross Lyon on Nine News, saying "Mitch who, what is his name". Then the reporter said "Clark" and he said "oh, he had a chance to come to us and didn't want to". Pretty ordinary and the guy is suffering from a mental illness, by the way.
  6. What about lunch tomorrow or dinner at Wongs? Who is available?
  7. 80, in case anyone cares with all this Clark business going on.
  8. You are welcome.
  9. Agree absolutely. Along with GNF I have pushed the "MC to play for the Dees again" line. If GNF is correct and if MC has told the MFC the truth, this has come about due to his medical treatment. I have no clue as to the veracity of this. Presumably until advised by his Doctors to play at another club, he was loyal and determined to resume with us. That loyalty will now be put to the test as Robbie 57 suggests. MC can insist that we get a good deal from his new club or refuse to play with them. Considering what we have done for him and paid him, I would expect nothing less. I still believe as he is on our list we have the whip hand during trade week and as a result of the AFL Retirement Clause he could be bound to us for another year. The AFL will have to look favourably on us given our position and what we have done for this player and what we stand to lose. I think we need to draw breath, stop abusing this bloke from behind keyboards and await the final outcome. No one could argue we got the better of the deal for the GWS player who left us. We have PJ and Roos in charge to get the best deal out of this. Lets see what happens, we may even be better off with what we end up with. Remember if MC had stayed retired we would probably have got nothing.
  10. Mitch Clark thread seeing a bit of activity lately. Has something happened?
  11. Far too sensible for a football fan's forum.
  12. First part of prediction looks like coming true, he will return to AFL. Just wait for the second, who with, I still believe us.
  13. Excuse me, he was signed on a 3 year $2m plus contract.
  14. I can't recall a player being mentioned without Carlton being named as an interested club.
  15. We seem to have dropped off Malceski. That could simply be he has got a better offer to stay and has told us. Whatever, that could be the reason for the interest in HL. Roos knows we need some pace off half back to set up play and give guys like Hogan a one out chance and that won't happen with slow chip kicks forward.
  16. Can I "quo" you on that?
  17. Well done.
  18. Finals wins so far going to ladder position. Could happen all the way through.
  19. He will be Bombers only ruck man when Paddy leaves.
  20. And if we can't get our hands on an elite mid by trade, we will draft Petracca and Brayshaw if they are available.
  21. Proves my point. Where are both teams today?
  22. Whatever, we have to remember we are not a prize destination for experienced players looking for finals to finish their careers. We are more likely to get a younger player or two who can't get a run at their clubs.
×
×
  • Create New...