Jump to content

Ham

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ham

  1. Melbourne need to ask for a please explain by the AFL for this terrible umpiring.
  2. Worst umpiring I've seen all year. Why the [censored] did Robinson get a free kick?
  3. At the end they highlight what a lot of us have been saying about Lockhart, hard running and shutting down options.
  4. Ham replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Wow, that's absurd.
  5. Ham replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Structure. He's a hard runner and get's himself into positions that help lock down the ground.
  6. Ham replied to Josh's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Small / Medium forward. He may play some midfield time, but he predominantly plays forward in the VFL and both senior games his played, he was forward with minimal chop out in the middle, his first goal was in the goal square against Port in the 1st quarter.
  7. Ham replied to Josh's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    James Jordon for mine is a much more like for like compared to Brayshaw / His Position. Tom Sparrow is a small forward, Jordon is an inside/outside midfielder and I think he provides exactly what we're expecting Brayshaw to deliver, but isn't. Jordon was having good game after good game last year in the VFL. Only change I would make is; Out: Jackson In: T-Mac Purely for the maturity and bigger body.
  8. Right............
  9. Ham replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Yep, you're definitely watching a different game to me.
  10. Could not agree anymore if I tried.
  11. Ham replied to dtrinh's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Ah ok, I thought it was the other way round.
  12. Ham replied to dtrinh's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    That score assist was good, but he did undo that with a bomb into the 50 at the other end in another quarter. When he had 2 forwards providing leads. It's just inexperience, but you would hope that someone would bring that up and show him.
  13. I have been, and from the sample size of both players, I'd rather pursue with Smith.
  14. Completely disagree. Go back and remind yourself of the OMac show.
  15. All these calls for Smith out and O Mac in.... People have really bad memories.
  16. Who knows what will happen, but pretty clueless comment to say they won't have impact because of conditions.
  17. Issue is, Richmond is playing bad, when they turn it around and find some form, Riewoldt will look a lot better. Doesn't matter if Melbourne play well or bad, T-Mac looks bad and has a turning circle like the Titanic.
  18. I mean, the last time we played Richmond in the wet, Riewoldt certainly didn't get a hold of it. Oh wait, that's right, he kicked 6
  19. I think you're right there. Weid did have a good tap down to Bennell for a goal, but I want to see him clunking them, not rucking.
  20. Jackson was playing in the scratch match, not sure of his minutes though.
  21. In: Weid, ANB Out: Melksham, Vanders
  22. Agree with the first part, completely disagree with the second part.
  23. Wait, what? Clearly we watched different games.
  24. Ham replied to WERRIDEE's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    He's not a key position player and also cost absolutely nothing to get him. Steer clear of Daniher as far as I'm concerned.
  25. Ham replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    That was incredibly ordinary from Viney, standing there, hands in pockets.