Swooper1987

Agree entirely with this. Max has a genuine predictability about his ruck work that on most occasions is a massive advantage for us. He does exactly as has been planned and nearly always finds one of our guys. Our problem is that our mid field, as hard as they are, are not clean and skillful players, probably Tracc aside. When you compare a Neale, or a Pendlebury or even someone like Michael Walters at Freo, we have nobody who is that clean. That extra third or half a second makes all the difference. The fumble creates the spill, which shifts the ball outside and bang, away they go. It's fixable but whether it can be fixed in time to save the season is the question.

Carlton and Hawthorn in the 80's were notorious for the brown paper bag. I don't think anything Don Scott has to say is a revelation for those of us following the game through that period. The reality is everyone (and that includes Melbourne) has transgressed the salary cup at some point. It cost us draft picks in the late 90's. Scott's point is more about why Hawthorn needed saving after so many years as a top club yet still with a low membership base. They did spend a lot of many of players and it sent the club broke. They are not the only club that has happened to. Interestingly enough, throughout the mid to late 80's Don was actually on the Demon coaching panel. He was the ruck coach of O'Dwyer and Stynes and as I recall was one of the very few media people Northey would let in the rooms from around 87-90. He had little if anything to do with the Hawks until he got back involved around the time of the merger. As eccentric as he may be, he's as honest as the day is long.

Yes but there are 6 votes aren't there? I agree May, Lever and Melksham were in the best 6 too. My point was that Gawn clearly wasn't beaten by his opponents and provided our midfield first use. I think you'll find Goodwin agreed with me on this point in his presser. Our mids were too fumbly and when the ball got loose the Brisbane mids tore us a new one. That is not Gawn's fault.

As poor as the were, they were less influential on the result than the misses of Bennell, Weidemann, Harmes et al. Just one of those goes through and we are all having a great night.

Gawn was definitely in our best 6 tonight. Position by position he was the only midfielder who wasn't beaten by his Brisbane counterpart over the entirety of the game. Neale, Lyons, Zorko, McLuggage pretty much had their way tonight. Whilst it wasn't one of Max's stellar performances he was very good again. Viney's effort was outstanding after half time and Oliver had his moments as well, despite some less than average disposal early. Tracc played just a game by his now lofty standards, just the one mark and no score. But as a group they lowered their colours. I'll be really interested in the coaches view of this one. I reckon a defender or two might pop up.

It's interesting, this whole midfield thing. Whilst numbers say that Viney, Oliver and to a lesser extent Tracc had good games, as a collective we were outgunned in the midfield comprehensively pretty much all night. Gawn was dominant in hit outs and hit outs to advantage and had a better than useful game around the ground, yet we couldn't translate that into any clearance dominance. It wasn't a great showing in the clinches and we need to do better with the huge advantage Gawn gives us pretty much every game.

He's a great coach - a future hall of famer and three weeks ago just about everyone on this forum would have signed him in a heart beat had he been available. People can say what they like about him, he just needs to point to the trophy cabinet. Whilst Carlton and Melbourne were "investing" in the draft, he was busy accumulating silverware. His personality is part of what makes him great. I loved him as a player. In his two years as a Demon he never gave less than his absolute best. Was runner up in the Bluey in his first year. He's one of the all time greats and like all of them, his team is going through a trough. I'll back him to turn it around.

I'd be concerned with any ranking system that doesn't have Gawn as our number 1. Three times AA in the past 4 years, dual B&F, AFL Coaches Award winner in 2018. And once again having another consistent and brilliant season. 6 games ago Tracc finished 5th in our club B&F - his first top 5 finish. He's played three outstanding games this season (Carlton, Hawthorn, GC and a couple of good ones). I'd think there would still be some distance between his and Gawn's output. But if he can go past Gawn then we will have two genuine champions and be well on our way to some long overdue team success.

Tassie shouldn't bother us. The games we have lost there have been less than a kick when Nth have been a better side than us. Shouldn't hold any fears at all. Our breaks and travel are actually better than a few others. Happy with it overall.

Tracc 3rd overall and Maxy 8th. Both a game behind the rest. A couple of All Australian seasons for both of those lads! Interesting that there are 5 Ruckmen in the top 20 (Gawn, Goldstein, Witts, English and Grundy in 20th place).

I love Tracc but he isn't the best player in the game. At least not yet. He probably isn't the best player at his club, although I'm looking forward to being proved wrong in about 12 weeks time.

20 votes in 2018 and 17 last season ( in a side that won 5 games and he missed one of those). Gawn polls well and has been outstanding this season too. Before this round was 3rd in the Age Player of the year and had polled votes in three of 5 games in the Herald Sun. Before this round Tracc is on 20 in the AFLCA award, Gawn on 17. They were clearly the two outstanding players on the ground today so should poll an 8 and a 10 or two 9's. And both still have a game in hand over all but Essendon. I doubt either will win the Brownlow but I'd be staggered if they both don't poll well.

6. Gawn 5. Petracca 4. Viney 3. Oliver 2 Weideman 1. Jackson - a really good game and just pipped Langdon for mine. Massive plaudits to the whole defence, although it helps when the towering figure of Gawn marks everything, and draws three opposition players to every contest.

He had 19 possies, 9 marks (4 contested) and 7 tackles. That's a very decent game for a ruckman. 12 hitouts but as you say Nic is one of the top 2 tap ruckmen in the game (our bloke is as good as him). It's an interesting observation and obviously the coaches view is the one that counts. Still it must have been one hell of a 7 possession game. I watched it and other than his goal and his post match handing over of the phone there weren't too many other highlights that I picked up. It was a good duel and O'Brien can hold his head high. And agree with everything you say about Petracca. A credit to his improved professionalism this season.

Absolutely. Petracca had (and has had all year) a great impact on Saturday night but he was the third best player in the Melbourne side against GC. NicNat at best drew level with O'Brien yet picked up 5 votes for 7 disposals and one goal. Go figure! As I said previously, it's all in the eye of the beholder.

Gawn is on 17 and equal 20th (8 v Carlton and 9 v GC). Interesting to note that Goldstein is the highest rated ruck by the coaches this year, followed by Naitanui, Witts and then Gawn. Grundy follows on 16. In the Age player of the year, Gawn is equal 3rd with Pendlebury (both on 30) with only Goldstein and Neale ahead. Gawn has also polled votes in three out of 5 games in the Herald Sun (1 v Carlton, 1 v Richmond, 3 v GC). Bearing in mind Max has a game in hand on everyone bar Petracca. It's all in the eye of the beholder but I'd say Gawn has made an excellent transition to the Captaincy and continues to play excellent footy. Based on Goodwin's post match comments he gave Gawn 5 and Viney 4. I think Dew didn't vote for Viney. Not sure how he saw Tracc as a 5 vote game given he went at 40% by foot but he is having a wonderful season and he did have a significant impact on the game.

If TMac doesn't come up I think Tomlinson is the logical replacement. He can swing between mid and forward and he played a great game against Hawthorn in the Marsh series.

Except that Jennings was part of the coaching group last year. He was also one of the coaches that voted for Oliver to win our B&F when he was accumulating some very average stats.

And that would be no surprise. Gawn is a good kick for a ruckman, but most of his delivery into the forward 50 is from a stationary play - he has time and composure (and yes, the skill) to hit a target. His pass to Melksham inside 50 at the City End last week was a great kick which wasn't rushed and was well executed.

Dermott Brereton can talk some absolute rubbish nearly all of the time, but his call on Sunday was spot on. Gawn had the measure of the Tiger rucks, we were winning clearance yet totally ineffective inside forward 50. The time was right to throw the big man forward and set Pickett at his feet. Our clearance numbers would have still been solid - Chol can't ruck -his strength is his mobility around the ground. Our high, indiscriminate bombs forward to Max may have had a different outcome to that which was seen when we bombed long to Hannan and Fritsch. Rather than move Tomlinson forward (a winger who actually holds his position well and has been playing reasonably good footy) I think Gawn needs to spend more time forward. This is where Weid becomes structurally important. He looks the most likely relief ruck and he never gets outmarked. He drops plenty but he does have a good second effort.

There is some real merit in this Old Dee, and I am a Gawn fan. When you look at the last few flag sides, they've managed to get by with journeymen type rucks. Richmond - Nankervis/Soldo/Grigg; WCE - Lycett/Vardy; Bulldogs - Boyd/Roughead; Hawks - McEvoy/Hale/Bailey; Swans - Pyke/Mumford. That takes us back almost 10 years. There's certainly no Gawn's, Grundy's,etc amongst that crew. Even back to the mighty Brisbane team who rolled Clark Keating out every September to feed Voss, Lappin, Power, Akermanis et al. I'm pleased Max is playing for us, but we are certainly not getting maximum benefit from his dominance.

1. Gawn comprehensively beat both Richmond rucks. There was no "break even". 2. No, I'm not Simon. 3. Go back and watch the game again. You'll see a goal where Gawn got the ball to Melksham which ended up in a goal (city end). Was a decent kick too. 4. Check the Age player of the year totals. Gawn is on 22 votes from 4 games (all the others in the top group have played 5). He has the 6th highest total with one game less. Goldstein is on 29 and Lachie Neale is the runaway leader. 5. Most unbiased observers believe Gawn is having another good year. 6. I respect your opinion even though I disagree with it.

So you are saying Chol was a more influential player today than Gawn? Righto!

Except he Grundy couldn't beat Phillips on Friday night. Grundy has played 1 good game this season - round 1 against the Bulldogs. Todd Goldstein has actually been the form ruckman this season.

Disagree. Nankervis goal was a gimmee from a terrible umpiring decision against Petracca. Nankervis got injured immediately before 3/4 time. Chol and Nakervis shared ruck duties and Gawn played 90% on ground. He beat both Chol and Nakervis convincingly and if you saw it any other way I doubt you were watching the same game as me. Gawn was not the reason we played so poorly today. And as for the season. We've played 4 games. He was beaten in round 1, was second best on ground in round 2 according to the coaches (8 votes), beat the Geelong rucks last week and was clearly in the best 5 or 6 on the ground today. Solid enough form for me.