Garbo

If Flanders cost saints pick 7 then trac is worth twice that, 7 can’t be the main component to this trade or the club has failed to deliver on there promise to trade trac only if the offer was compelling

Could try turn 6 and 7 into pick 1 or 2 even in a weaker draft that’s still going to be a good player, think there is a ruck / fwd in the first few but this time he’s from vic

And people were wondering why he’s been asked to leave, this is why we couldn’t have good culture

Now that gc has pick 7 from saints and they also say Humphreys is untradable do we say ok 6 and 7 then, which would compromise there ability to draft there academy picks this year and see which way they swing, get the feeling with so many high end academy players they aren’t going to miss him

Time to see if dees stick to there guns of only letting trac go on our terms, without Humphrey hard to see how they can live up to those words

How many players get back to there best post 30, even Dangerfield who would be the best case outcome for trac didn’t make another all Australian after 30 and he was coming from a higher peak, yes he was a match winner from time to time still but he was lesser and on the decline. Trac is coming from further back so unless he can pull a Benjamin button we have likely already seen the best from him.

Agree to disagree, danger was coming off 7 all Australians from the last 8 years and a Brownlow medal winner and was widely considered the best player in the afl with Dustin Martin, trac just like Kennedy at the time is 2 years out from his last all Australian and past his prime. Danger is in a league Trac dreams he was in. I’ll be happy if we swing it that’s for sure as I rate Humphrys potential just as high as trac at the same stage of his career

We aren’t getting 12 unless we picked up his entire contract, 32 or 34 or a future 2nd round is more in line with us paying a smaller portion of his contract. Dogs effectively paid 14 for Adam Trelour in 2020 in similar circumstances but he was held in much higher regard at the time

yes we set the price but unless they are mentally challenged it’s a dumb deal, they are still a very young side who just made finals for the first time, imagine someone asked Dee’s to trade out trac after 2018 for Josh Kennedy from swans at the time and pay a pick on top to boot

1 it’s 5 years by the start of next season it’s expected a good chunk of players would no longer be here 2 No one is crying over harmes or spargo leaving. 3 if Oliver didn’t have such a long contract he would have already been let go to, do you honestly still think he is a premium midfielder 4 May is physically cooked everyone could see that for the last 18 months, he had a good career but we have moved past him see point 2 5 Jordan couldn’t lock a spot in the side and saw the writing on the wall he had no future outside of depth. 6 That just leaves Trac, ANB and Jackson who we actually would have preferred to keep, but let’s be honest ANB is a roll player who many on here were happy to see the back of. Trac we possibly will get a premium for so mid to long that could work out a win, leaving just Jackson who we got a good trade for all things considered but who we couldn’t have done anymore to keep. 1 to 2 actual losses isn’t bad

Humphrey has the potential to be what trac was in the next few years, no chance gc give him up even for trac

The thing that doesn’t line up for me is if Oliver isn’t in the 22 under King who is replacing him, I don’t think Sparrow is ahead of him, Rivers didn’t inspire when given the chance this year either. Langford would eventually but he will just be entering his 2nd year. So regardless of if he says or goes it feels like a step backwards at least in the short term and if trac goes as well that leaves 2 slots open

I think this is a bit different, just like with Steven May Oliver is being told to look at his options elsewhere

We finished 14th something had to give, we want to keep trac but he wants out so we just have to deal with that best as we can, Oliver was happy to stay but we want him out so it’s the opposite way round. I just hope if we are telling Oliver this that we have lined up a deal with another club because no one is going take Oliver from us unless we tip in a significant portion of his salary

If Oliver has been called into a meeting to be given bad news sounds like they have a deal with another club on the table and he’s been told take the trade or you won’t have a spot next year

I just hope we go in with the attitude that we are willing to do no deal and let anyone interested come back next year and try again if we don’t get what we want

Not the worst trade, rachele has a high ceiling and kicks goals, I can imagine him and Pickett both rotating through the mid

Fast fwd 2 years and Viney and Gawn will be gone, that leaves us with a mid of Oliver? Pickett, Langford, Windsor and Lindsey and unknown ruck, even if the kids work out it doesn’t seem like a contenders midfield bottom half of the 8 in a best case

I agree but everyone else looking at the downside, of omg he’s 30 which means he’s over the hill and only a few years left, a poor kick and won’t ever get back to his pre injury form

Damm can’t even give him credit for the one good trade we did

Problem is if u go on crows forum or any neutral one and the media everyone else thinks 14 and future first is overs, most seem to think 14 and some later picks is the market

Yes but we could have waited one year still got May and used the pick to, and you know who gc took with that pick Ben King, imagine that outcome

that the problem with lamb is he doesn’t want any problems, he pays overs to get players in and gets unders when they go. The only one I recall us putting the foot down was hogan and we did get a good return on that in retrospect but then gave it all away to get may one year early before free agency. 100% of trac nominates crows we get at most 14 and a future first which he will probably then hand over in its entirety for Flanders. 🤢

I just know if we deal with crows we will get screwed, 14 this year will end up in the 20s in a weak draft and a future first will more than likely be even worse next year with trac improving there side. I just can’t understand pushing him out in what is effectively a fire sale or a swap of picks that nets us Flanders. Is the relationship that far gone that we have no option but to trade now.

I just hope we aren’t considering what will be effectively a swap of trac for Flanders, by all indications the crows will be offering the current first and future which would both probably be then needed to get Flanders. As much as I want more talent in the door letting trac out at the same time is a net loss