Jump to content

Beware the number 38!

Featured Replies

Posted

The Professor who is bringing us that interesting series on club jumper numbers sent me an email today warning of the dangers of wearing the number 38 based on the experience of recent years.

Back in 1993, David Neitz wore the jumper in his debut season but he soon grabbed the number 9 and made it famous at the club. Martin Heppell from St. Kilda took it over in 1995 and he was followed by Darren O'Brien (1996-7) who was the last player to wear the number in a senior AFL game with the Demons.

Since that time the jumper has been held by -

1998 Brent Williams

1999 -2000 Luke Taylor ®

2001 - 2003 Daniel Breese

2004 Joel Campbell ®

2005 Brendan Van Schaik ®

2006 - 2007 Daniel Hughes ®

Jumper 39 hasn't fared much better since it was last worn by Craig Smoker in 1999. The # 39 locker has been occupied this century by -

2000 Michael Clark (who finally got a game in 2002 but only after switching to number 17)

2001 Mitchell Craig

2003 Ezra Poyas ®

2006 - 2007 Shane Neaves ®

Moral of the story - stay away from these numbers?

 

Aside from Neitz, the No 38 has been an ordinary number for MFC.

In fact, can anyone name a player from any Club that has had a prominent AFL career and worn the Number 38 guernsey? Can't think of one myself.

Interesting considering No 42,43 and 44 have carried their fair share of champion players.

 
Aside from Neitz, the No 38 has been an ordinary number for MFC.

In fact, can anyone name a player from any Club that has had a prominent AFL career and worn the Number 38 guernsey? Can't think of one myself.

Interesting considering No 42,43 and 44 have carried their fair share of champion players.

Ray Nilsson anyone. He was good enough to play in a Premiership team, a lot of Melbourne players have recently failed to do so.


Ray Nilsson anyone. He was good enough to play in a Premiership team, a lot of Melbourne players have recently failed to do so.

Who??

There a number of players over the years who by fate or other matters get to play in a premiership. They are generally no 22 selected in that team. It recognises their good fortune but does not vindicate their talent. Steven Armstrong and Shannon Motlop are 2 such players.

Are there any famous No 38's ? (I dont mean Pamela Anderson! :P )

Who??

There a number of players over the years who by fate or other matters get to play in a premiership. They are generally no 22 selected in that team. It recognises their good fortune but does not vindicate their talent. Steven Armstrong and Shannon Motlop are 2 such players.

Are there any famous No 38's ? (I dont mean Pamela Anderson! :P )

Ray was on the bench in the 1960 premiership side in his first year at the club. He came through the 3rds and as a rover-forward averaged better than a goal a game. Played 41 games with Melbourne and 21 for South. And back in those dark days there were only two on the bench so he was at least the 20th best available. Notwithstanding any luck Nilsson may have had he was in some pretty good company.

1960 Premiers

Ray was on the bench in the 1960 premiership side in his first year at the club. He came through the 3rds and as a rover-forward averaged better than a goal a game. Played 41 games with Melbourne and 21 for South. And back in those dark days there were only two on the bench so he was at least the 20th best available. Notwithstanding any luck Nilsson may have had he was in some pretty good company.

1960 Premiers

Thanks Champ.

As 20th man, did he get a run?

Its funny when you get those brilliant teams with consecutive premierships that besides the stars there are those that can count themselves fortunate for being in the right place at the right time. Martin Pike was the ultimate. A good player, a feral ratbag off the field but 4 flags...

 
Ray was on the bench in the 1960 premiership side in his first year at the club. He came through the 3rds and as a rover-forward averaged better than a goal a game. Played 41 games with Melbourne and 21 for South. And back in those dark days there were only two on the bench so he was at least the 20th best available. Notwithstanding any luck Nilsson may have had he was in some pretty good company.

1960 Premiers

Ray Nilsson was a one hit wonder and I much preferred Harry Nilsson myself. Ray played with John Lord but Harry thought the Lord lived in New York City. :lol: His other hit was Without You. Like his mate John Lennon, Harry died at a relatively young age. Don't know if he ever wore #38.

Ray Nilsson was a one hit wonder and I much preferred Harry Nilsson myself. Ray played with John Lord but Harry thought the Lord lived in New York City. :lol: His other hit was Without You. Like his mate John Lennon, Harry died at a relatively young age. Don't know if he ever wore #38.

I doubt he did wear number 38, but I'm pretty sure he put the lime in the coconut and drank 'em both up!!

  • 3 weeks later...

Well, it seems that the warning has been heeded.

Nobody at the club has been given the # 38.

Doesn't that put Austin Woneamirri in the hot seat with 39?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    It's Game Day and the Demons are back on the road again and this may be the last roll of the dice to get their 2025 season back on track as they take on the Gold Coast Suns at People First Stadium.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 546 replies
  • PREVIEW: Gold Coast

    The Gold Coast Suns find themselves outside of the top eight for the first time since Round 1 with pressure is mounting on the entire organisation. Their coach Damien Hardwick expressed his frustration at his team’s condition last week by making a middle-finger gesture on television that earned him a fine for his troubles. He showed his desperation by claiming that Fox should pick up the tab.  There’s little doubt the Suns have shown improvement in 2025, and their position on the ladder is influenced to some extent by having played fewer games than their rivals for a playoff role at the end of the season, courtesy of the disruption caused by Cyclone Alfred in March.  However, they are following the same trajectory that hindered the club in past years whenever they appeared to be nearing their potential. As a consequence, that Hardwick gesture should be considered as more than a mere behavioral lapse. It’s a distress signal that does not bode well for the Queenslanders. While the Suns are eager to remain in contention with the top eight, Melbourne faces its own crisis, which is similarly deep-seated but in a much different way. After recovering from a disappointing start to the season and nearing a return to respectability among its peer clubs, the Demons have experienced a decline in status, driven by the fact that while their form has been reasonable (see their performance against the ladder leader in the Kings Birthday match), their conversion in front of goal is poor enough to rank last in the competition. Furthermore, their opponents find them exceptionally easy to score against. As a result, they have effectively eliminated themselves from the finals race and are again positioned to finish in the bottom half of the ladder.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 15

    As the Demons head into their Bye Round, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches being played. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons if we can manage to turn our season around? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

      • Like
    • 287 replies
  • REPORT: Port Adelaide

    Of course, it’s not the backline, you might argue and you would probably be right. It’s the boot studder (do they still have them?), the midfield, the recruiting staff, the forward line, the kicking coach, the Board, the interchange bench, the supporters, the folk at Casey, the head coach and the club psychologist  It’s all of them and all of us for having expectations that were sufficiently high to have believed three weeks ago that a restoration of the Melbourne team to a position where we might still be in contention for a finals berth when the time for the midseason bye arrived. Now let’s look at what happened over the period of time since Melbourne overwhelmed the Sydney Swans at the MCG in late May when it kicked 8.2 to 5.3 in the final quarter (and that was after scoring 3.8 to two straight goals in the second term). 

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 3 replies
  • CASEY: Essendon

    Casey’s unbeaten run was extended for at least another fortnight after the Demons overran a persistent Essendon line up by 29 points at ETU Stadium in Port Melbourne last night. After conceding the first goal of the evening, Casey went on a scoring spree from about ten minutes in, with five unanswered majors with its fleet of midsized runners headed by the much improved Paddy Cross who kicked two in quick succession and livewire Ricky Mentha who also kicked an early goal. Leading the charge was recruit of the year, Riley Bonner while Bailey Laurie continued his impressive vein of form. With Tom Campbell missing from the lineup, Will Verrall stepped up to the plate demonstrating his improvement under the veteran ruckman’s tutelage. The Demons were looking comfortable for much of the second quarter and held a 25-point lead until the Bombers struck back with two goals in the shadows of half time. On the other side of the main break their revival continued with first three goals of the half. Harry Sharp, who had been quiet scrambled in the Demons’ first score of the third term to bring the margin back to a single point at the 17 minute mark and the game became an arm-wrestle for the remainder of the quarter and into the final moments of the last.

      • Clap
    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Gold Coast

    The Demons have the Bye next week but then are on the road once again when they come up against the Gold Coast Suns on the Gold Coast in what could be a last ditch effort to salvage their season. Who comes in and who comes out?

      • Thanks
    • 372 replies