1 hour ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

I wonder who the four poor buggers are?

If Buckenara's on the payroll he'd have Harmes as poor and Josh Wagner above average.

In the article it talks about part of the criteria being "durability and how likely they are to be selected" so you could pencil in guys like vandenBerg, Joel Smith, Kolodjashnij, Jordan maybe even Bradtke and Nietschke as potential candidates.

Richmond were also ranked 12 in 2017.

On 12/5/2019 at 12:25 PM, Nelo said:

Wish we had the bulldogs list. Reckon they will win a couple of flags over the next 5 years. 

Doubt it

Assuming the model is sound and without bias....

then

The whinging is akin to those anti science AGW skeptics claiming conspiracy “because teh hockey stick graph “ or somesuch

Facts don’t care about feelings 

3 hours ago, drysdale demon said:

Doubt it

Who knows. Anything can happen. They have talent through. 

19 hours ago, JakovichScissorKick said:

Bulldogs 2nd LOL

 

Dogs are right in the flag frame for the next 5 years.  They've got a great young list and the only important player that will retire soonish is Easton Wood and he's not vital to success.  They have an awesome young midfield group, match winning star power in Bont and have covered their deficiencies with Keath and Bruce.

Edited December 6, 20195 yr by Fifty-5