Jump to content

Featured Replies

15 minutes ago, Macca said:

Go again mate

You dipped, you took a bite, ypu dipped again!

Ok then.....im gonna have a look at one of these soccer doubles: These guys have had some big wins this season inc 7-1. Lets hope they can keep the form going at home with at least a few goals.....

 

Football England Championship West Brom v Stoke    West Brom Win  +2.5 goals $3.50

 

Best Sports bets for the weekend:

EPL: Watford vs Tottenham (Win) and More than 2.5 goals in the game $2.30

French Lique 1 Monaco (Win) and More than 2.5 goals in the game $3.70 vs Marseille

Crystal Palace v Southampton : Selection- Over 2.5 Match Goals $2.10

Preston v Bolton Selection- Over 2.5 Match Goals $2.20.

NRL   Melbourne Storm v Penrith ....Melbourne line -2.5   $1.92

Football England Championship West Brom v Stoke    West Brom Win  +2.5 goals $3.50

Our best (so far) amount to approx 264/1

We await the mighty Binman....

  • Author
6 hours ago, Wadda We Sing said:

Best Sports bets for the weekend:

EPL: Watford vs Tottenham (Win) and More than 2.5 goals in the game $2.30

French Lique 1 Monaco (Win) and More than 2.5 goals in the game $3.70 vs Marseille

Crystal Palace v Southampton : Selection- Over 2.5 Match Goals $2.10

Preston v Bolton Selection- Over 2.5 Match Goals $2.20.

NRL   Melbourne Storm v Penrith ....Melbourne line -2.5   $1.92

Football England Championship West Brom v Stoke    West Brom Win  +2.5 goals $3.50

Our best (so far) amount to approx 264/1

We await the mighty Binman....

With odds-boost I just got on for 400-1 Wadda ... took the Storm to win @ 2.15 as the Storm line drifted out to +1.5.  Anyway,  we're in with a show.

One thing I recall from winning a few decent multi's is that you need a couple/few decent payers amongst the picks.  i.e you've got to take a few chances. 

It's not as simple as just picking all the favoured teams to win.  Our 2 value picks are West Brom & Monaco - mixed in with 4 other picks that ordinarily could or should get up. 

 
3 hours ago, Macca said:

With odds-boost I just got on for 400-1 Wadda ... took the Storm to win @ 2.15 as the Storm line drifted out to +1.5.  Anyway,  we're in with a show.

One thing I recall from winning a few decent multi's is that you need a couple/few decent payers amongst the picks.  i.e you've got to take a few chances. 

It's not as simple as just picking all the favoured teams to win.  Our 2 value picks are West Brom & Monaco - mixed in with 4 other picks that ordinarily could or should get up. 

Yeap...thats a good point, a couple of decent legs. Thats why i always liked under 15.5 either side cause you always get at least 2.60 and it covers the draw. And with odds like 400/1 you only need get one and your in front for years. Many free hits after that.

Pity Storm could get the job done in Slaters last H&A game. Did alright till halftime. Reload again tomorrow. I like the other picks.

Edited by Wadda We Sing

  • Author
14 minutes ago, Wadda We Sing said:

Yeap...thats a good point, a couple of decent legs. Thats why i always liked under 15.5 either side cause you always get at least 2.60 and it covers the draw.

Pity Storm could get the job done in Slaters last H&A game. Did alright till halftime. Reload again tomorrow. I like the other picks.

I base my thinking on the make-up of the results of any pick 5, 6 or 7 that one might put on ... there's nearly always at least 1 or 2 results that would have been at good odds beforehand.  Of course,  predicting which ones is the tough bit. 

My Monaco pick is based on them finding their true form ... they are a team that will almost certainly finish in the top 3 in Ligue 1 at seasons end so they will start winning at some stage and they are a free-scoring team.  Marseille have good scoring power from their midfield too.  2 - 1 or 3 - 1 is on the cards.  Here are their historical results (head to head)


22 minutes ago, Wadda We Sing said:

Yeap...thats a good point, a couple of decent legs. Thats why i always liked under 15.5 either side cause you always get at least 2.60 and it covers the draw. And with odds like 400/1 you only need get one and your in front for years. Many free hits after that.

Pity Storm could get the job done in Slaters last H&A game. Did alright till halftime. Reload again tomorrow. I like the other picks.

We just can’t get Panthers games right Wadda. Such an unpredictable team. Storm had a host of players out, Slater missed the game due to family reasons I believe. 

Penrith had two players sin binned in the first half, they somehow managed to hold strong with the disadvantage and went on to win the game. It was actually an entertaining match to watch. Very strange feeling watching an NRL game only on a Friday night.

I’m liking the soccer games chosen this week, awesome value. I’m placing all 5 in the multi and also looking to play around with a system 3 or system 4.

I need to remember to read this thread a lot more.

Some very tasty soccer picks there. Quick multi before hitting the hay.

9 hours ago, layzie said:

I need to remember to read this thread a lot more.

Some very tasty soccer picks there. Quick multi before hitting the hay.

Hey Layzie, thanks man. We did it just for some fun and were interested in peoples best bets to do with any kind of sport across the world over a given weekend. We are all pretty easy going here and there are no arguments and egos. Feel free to join in the fun and select a pick or 2. Just try and get them in by a Friday evening if you can. We also have the now infamous Day at the Races thread, which if nothing else will be good entertainment during the upcoming Spring Carnival.

Edited by Wadda We Sing

 

Results so far:

Storm 16  Penrith 22    (loss)

West Brom 2 Stoke City 1  (win)

Preston 2 Bolton 2    (win)

Crystal Palace 0 Southhampton 2     (loss)

Two games still to come tonight....

  • Author
1 hour ago, Wadda We Sing said:

Results so far:

Storm 16  Penrith 22    (loss)

West Brom 2 Stoke City 1  (win)

Preston 2 Bolton 2    (win)

Crystal Palace 0 Southhampton 2     (loss)

Two games still to come tonight....

Got close with the 2 losses too Wadda ... I'll add a couple more soccer to the 2 we have left out of our original picks - these 2 ...

EPL: Watford vs Tottenham (Win) and Match Score +2.5 goals $2.30

French Lique1:  Monaco (Win) and Match Score +2.5 goals $3.70 vs Marseille

Arsenal,  Man Utd,  Barcelona,  Valencia,  Ajax,  Napoli,  Leipzig,  Schalke,  Benfica & Porto are all engaged in matches tonight so there's some choices available.

Edited by Macca


27 minutes ago, Macca said:

Got close with the 2 losses too Wadda ... I'll add a couple more soccer to the 2 we have left out of our original picks - these 2 ...

EPL: Watford vs Tottenham (Win) and Match Score +2.5 goals $2.30

French Lique 1 Monaco (Win) and Match Score +2.5 goals $3.70 vs Marseille

Arsenal,  Man Utd,  Barcelona,  Valencia,  Ajax,  Napoli,  Leipzig,  Schalke,  Benfica & Porto are all engaged in matches tonight so there's some choices available.

Sunday fun day and reload ya reckon!?? Yes might have a go TAB way less crowded on a Sunday here, in fact empty mostly...

  • Author
3 minutes ago, Wadda We Sing said:

Sunday fun day and reload ya reckon!?? Yes might have a go TAB way less crowded on a Sunday here, in fact empty mostly...

Well,  if the 2 choices left get up then we're going to have PL again Wadda ? 

I'll add on 2 or 3 more out of the other soccer games played tonight and then hopefully wake and win!  Don't fancy the Rugby League games today so overnight it is. 

I know many like to watch a sporting event whilst having a bet on that event but I'm often the opposite (except for horse racing)  I'd often rather watch & enjoy without the hip-pocket factor. 

For instance,  the Broncos are playing for a home final today as long as they win by 24+ whilst the Sharks can't take it easy either - they lose by a good margin and they could lose the double-chance.  And we know that blow-outs can happen in Rugby League - either way.

Came up with a 4 leg multi for overnight soccer games.

I’ve taken 2 the suggested specials. Spurs win/over 2.5 goals and Monaco win/over 2.5 goals into a couple of more games.

BELGIAN PRO LEAGUE

Cercle Brugge v Gent - Monday 3rd at 02:00

Gent win/over 2.5 match goals. $3.10

 ITALIAN SERIE A

Lazio v Frosinone - Monday 3rd at 04:30

Lazio win/over 2.5 match goals $1.62

 

 

Edited by Dee Zephyr

8 minutes ago, Dee Zephyr said:

Came up with a 4 leg multi for overnight soccer games.

I’ve taken 2 the suggested specials. Spurs win/over 2.5 goals and Monaco win/over 2.5 goals into a couple of more games.

BELGIAN PRO LEAGUE

Cercle Brugge v Gent - Monday 3rd at 02:00

Gent win/over 2.5 match goals. $3.10

 ITALIAN SERIE A

Lazio v Frosinone - Monday 3rd at 04:30

Lazio win/over 2.5 match goals $1.62

 

 

I like it ....ive been to Gent! Awesome old town in Belgium. Beer and chocolate to die for! Im on...

College Football has commenced this weekend. I don’t mind indulging in a 3-4 leg multi over any given weekend consisting only that of ranked teams and line betting only.

The top 25 are ranked and those rankings change weekly depending on results over the previous weekend. Some of the lines set might seem like a little over the top but as we know the bookies get things right most of the time. 

Some of the ranked teams might play against weak and unranked colleges and I’d rather hedge my bet with a highly ranked team. 

Here’s how Week 1 has fared so far with the Top 25 teams covering or not covering the line. There’s no written rule that you have to take the favourite at the line, it’s just my preference. 

Number before team denotes ranking and A or H denotes home or away.

(21) (A) UCF 56 v UCONN 17 Line UCF -23.5 ✔️

(11) (H) Michigan State 38 v Utah State 31 Line Mich.St. -0.5✔️

(4) (H) Wisconsin 34 v W Kentucky 3 Line Wisconsin -36.5 ✖️

(13) (H) Stanford 31 v San Diego State 10 Line Stanford -14 ✔️

(5) (H) OSU 77 v Oregon State 31 Line OSU -39✔️

(23) (A) Texas 29 v Maryland 34 Line Texas -13.5✖️

(7) (H) Oklahoma 63 v FAU 14 Line Oklahoma -18.5✔️

(16) (H) TCU 55 v Southern 7 Line TCU -50✖️

(2) (H) Clemson 48 v Furman 7 Line Clemson -50.5✖️

(6)  (A) Washington 16 v (9) Auburn 21 Line Auburn -1.5✔️

(3) (H) Georgia 45 v Austin Peay 0 Line Georgia -48✖️

(17) (A) WVU 40 v Tennessee 14 Line WVU -10✔️

(10) (H) PSU 45 v App State 38 Overtime. Line PSU -24.5✖️

(15) (H) USC 43 v UNLV 21 Line USC - 26.5✖️

(22) (A) Boise State 56 v Troy 20 Line Boise St -10✔️

(18) (H) Miss St 63 v SF Austin 6 Line Miss St -48✔️

(12) (H) Notre Dame 24 v  (14) Michigan 17 Line ND -8.5 ✖️

(1) (H) Alabama 51 v Louisville 14 Line Alabama -24✔️

(24) (H) Oregon 58 v Bowling Green 24 Line Oregon -30.5✔️

I like to wait until a few weeks into the season when the rankings become a little more concrete although they do alter, it still gives me a reasonable idea of the stronger colleges.

As you can see above, some lines were covered and some not. You might want to avoid the lines set at -30 and above but those teams did give the bigger spread a decent shake. I tend to also avoid ranked colleges playing each other unless I see value in the home team. 

There was only one noticeable upset with the 23 ranked Texas losing. Sometimes head to head markets aren’t offered in certain games, only line betting. 

I don’t mind the NCAA Football as something to pass the time by and we all know we needed other interests to get us through the off season in the last decade or so.

 


  • Author

Had the goals but wrong winners ... however,  Liverpool,  Man City,  Juventus,  Real Madrid,  Barcelona & Bayern Munich all won with all their games providing +2.5 goals  (Barcelona won 8-2 in their game)

So the method is there but the trust has to probably be with the really big clubs and then be satisfied with the lesser dividend.  Just like the horses,  it's better to be let down by the class runner/team.

Good bet???? To win $700....

 

90AB0D11-E821-40FE-8E73-671E37207673.png

43 minutes ago, Dee Zephyr said:

Good bet???? To win $700....

 

90AB0D11-E821-40FE-8E73-671E37207673.png

Serious question.....if a player (Federer) pulls a hamstring during the match and retires.......then...

Oh what.....Federer lost!!

  • Author
1 hour ago, Dee Zephyr said:

Good bet???? To win $700....

A bad bet ... a real bad bet!

You often wonder about the situation of those who place these sorts of bets ... do they do it all the time?  Unlimited collateral?  Seems like a hiding to nothing bet DZ.

 


4 minutes ago, Macca said:

A bad bet ... a real bad bet!

You often wonder about the situation of those who place these sorts of bets ... do they do it all the time?  Unlimited collateral?  Seems like a hiding to nothing bet DZ.

 

Thats why i was asking about the injury senario Macca. Sure there are 1.02 bets, but i always think......(not that id ever bet on them)....what about the injury scenario and forfeiting matches ....do these monkeys even think of that? Some people have too much money

  • Author
1 minute ago, Wadda We Sing said:

Thats why i was asking about the injury senario Macca. Sure there are 1.02 bets, but i always think......(not that id ever bet on them)....what about the injury scenario and forfeiting matches ....do these monkeys even think of that? Some people have too much money

1.10 or even 1.08 you'd maybe understand but 1.02?  That's what I call skinny odds.

And here we are trying to win $700 with a fiver!  ?

 

3 minutes ago, Macca said:

1.10 or even 1.08 you'd maybe understand but 1.02?  That's what I call skinny odds.

And here we are trying to win $700 with a fiver!  ?

 

I know which way id rather try! :)

 

 
1 hour ago, Macca said:

A bad bet ... a real bad bet!

You often wonder about the situation of those who place these sorts of bets ... do they do it all the time?  Unlimited collateral?  Seems like a hiding to nothing bet DZ.

 

I’ve never understood the idea behind these massive bets at those odds Macca. What’s the theory behind it? I mean....$700, what difference does it make?

The only thing that springs to mind is the punter might be some kind of high roller that needs to keep turning over funds for rewards or benefits  of some sort. Even then, TAB rewards won’t get you a flight to the Bahamas.

  • Author
10 minutes ago, Dee Zephyr said:

I’ve never understood the idea behind these massive bets at those odds Macca. What’s the theory behind it? I mean....$700, what difference does it make?

The only thing that springs to mind is the punter might be some kind of high roller that needs to keep turning over funds for rewards or benefits  of some sort. Even then, TAB rewards won’t get you a flight to the Bahamas.

Well what we can guess at DZ is that it couldn't have been a first-timer.  And perhaps the punter has never been burnt before with these sort of bets?

Not sure you'd 'go-again' in a hurry though ... the quintessential 'Once bitten,  twice shy' hey!  Oops!

Edited by Macca


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Haha
    • 198 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Haha
    • 47 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Clap
      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 330 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Like
    • 31 replies