ProDee, you use the club's b & f as the litmus test, then you use goals, then you compare Watts' output to Gunston's....

Make up your mind, lad.

Watts is having a fantastic year and he's been an integral part of the team's progress.

Time for a hug.

17 minutes ago, ProDee said:

That's just waffle from a well-known lightweight.  You haven't addressed one aspect of what you're disagreeing with.  As I said, you've been hogtied by your own incompetence.

As I said preseason, goals per game was a worthwhile parameter for his new role.  Naturally you scoffed, because you lacked vision. He had to impact the scoreboard and he has.  You couldn't see it coming, which is why you call it a "stringy" objective.  That's how dopes defend their earlier lack of insight.

And thanks, I'm going to have a wonderful day.

 

Is there an echo in here?

 

1 minute ago, stuie said:

Is there an echo in here?

 

Aren't you busy replying to Nasher telling how mean he is ?

7 minutes ago, jumbo returns said:

ProDee, you use the club's b & f as the litmus test, then you use goals, then you compare Watts' output to Gunston's....

Make up your mind, lad.

Watts is having a fantastic year and he's been an integral part of the team's progress.

Time for a hug.

Another non-thinker.

Clearly a B&F result is a litmus test, as is goals kicked for a permanent forward (i.e. Watts role this year).  

There's a reason Jeremy Howe is a failed forward and plays down back.  He doesn't impact the scoreboard.

Some of you have been posting here for a decade, but haven't grown an inch in that time.

Honestly ProDee, all internet wars aside, I think you need to accept that not everyone will see things the same as you. Doesn't make them a "dope" and doesn't mean they haven't "grown an inch", just means that they don't agree with you, no matter how many posts you use to insult or thrust your "logic" down their throat.

Have a cuppa mate.

 

3 minutes ago, ProDee said:

Another non-thinker.

Clearly a B&F result is a litmus test, as is goals kicked for a permanent forward (i.e. Watts role this year).  

There's a reason Jeremy Howe is a failed forward and plays down back.  He doesn't impact the scoreboard.

Some of you have been posting here for a decade, but haven't grown an inch in that time.

Watts' role this year has not always been the permanent forward. So, wrong...

Further, it still grates on you that you've made some outlandish commentary about this player's future and been found to be....wrong x2

So, admit that you're wrong x3 and let the healing begin.

 

2 minutes ago, stuie said:

Honestly ProDee, all internet wars aside, I think you need to accept that not everyone will see things the same as you. Doesn't make them a "dope" and doesn't mean they haven't "grown an inch", just means that they don't agree with you, no matter how many posts you use to insult or thrust your "logic" down their throat.

Have a cuppa mate.

 

If you didn't potshot from the sidelines with your gifs and inane comments you wouldn't know how to participate on the internet.

It's little wonder your lightweight views get held to account.  

1 minute ago, ProDee said:

If you didn't potshot from the sidelines with your gifs and inane comments you wouldn't know how to participate on the internet.

It's little wonder your lightweight views get held to account.  

11 minutes ago, jumbo returns said:

Watts' role this year has not always been the permanent forward. So, wrong...

Further, it still grates on you that you've made some outlandish commentary about this player's future and been found to be....wrong x2

So, admit that you're wrong x3 and let the healing begin.

 

No, he is a permanent forward.  The fact that he drifts back at crucial stages or at the end of a quarter doesn't change this.  It's called modern footy.  Rest assured, he's a permanent forward in 2016.  Even more to the point, be thankful he's finally playing his best role.  Not only don't you seem to recognise this, you even want to deny it.

And clearly enunciate to me where I've been wrong about this player.  Remember, put some effort into it or you'll come up short.

Edited June 16, 20169 yr by ProDee

3 minutes ago, ProDee said:

No, he is a permanent forward.  The fact that he drifts back at crucial stages or at the end of a quarter doesn't change this.  It's called modern footy.  rest assured, he's a permanent forward in 2016.  Even more to the point, be thankful he's finally playing his best role.  Not only don't you seem to recognise this, you even want to deny it.

And clearly enunciate to me where I've been wrong about this player.  Remember, put some effort into it or you'll come up short.

Except when he is in the ruck or playing back or on the wing.

1 minute ago, ProDee said:

No, he is a permanent forward.  The fact that he drifts back at crucial stages or at the end of a quarter doesn't change this.  It's called modern footy.  rest assured, he's a permanent forward in 2016.  Even more to the point, be thankful he's finally playing his best role.  Not only don't you seem to recognise this, you even want to deny it.

And clearly enunciate to me where I've been wrong about this player.  Remember, put some effort into it or you'll come up short.

I won't pander to your challenges, PD....I'm busy. You are wrong about 2016. 

You scoffed at my observation that this player is finally exposed to a coaching regime that's got a clue....or, you'll refute that too?

Suffice to say, he's playing fantastic footy.

I'm going to sit back and enjoy the ride. I suggest you do, too.

3 minutes ago, ManDee said:

Except when he is in the ruck or playing back or on the wing.

Nah mate.  You have to do better than that.

Does anyone understand footy in here ?

Just now, ProDee said:

Nah mate.  You have to do better than that.

Does anyone understand footy in here ?

Other than evidence you mean? You clearly have your biases as we all do, I disagree with you. When everyone disagrees with you it is possible that they are right.

1 minute ago, jumbo returns said:

I won't pander to your challenges, PD....I'm busy. You are wrong about 2016. 

You scoffed at my observation that this player is finally exposed to a coaching regime that's got a clue....or, you'll refute that too?

Suffice to say, he's playing fantastic footy.

I'm going to sit back and enjoy the ride. I suggest you do, too.

As I thought.

Just now, ManDee said:

Other than evidence you mean? You clearly have your biases as we all do, I disagree with you. When everyone disagrees with you it is possible that they are right.

Yeah mate, and Hogan isn't a permanent forward, because he goes back too.

No more wasting time with you.

1 minute ago, ProDee said:

Yeah mate, and Hogan isn't a permanent forward, because he goes back too.

No more wasting time with you.

Thanks. 

15 minutes ago, stuie said:

8 minutes ago, ProDee said:

As I thought.

As you thought, what?

20 minutes ago, ProDee said:

No, he is a permanent forward.  The fact that he drifts back at crucial stages or at the end of a quarter doesn't change this.

Not quite sure you understand the definition of the word "permanent"....

 

Nothing like a JW thread to bring people together .

 

I pronounce  T.O.D @  10.34

3 hours ago, stuie said:

Not quite sure you understand the definition of the word "permanent"....

 

Stuie he is an augmentative strop, a little like you, and me and many others here.

 

Edit:- I meant argumentative strop but I like augmentative that could work.

Edited June 16, 20169 yr by ManDee

8 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

I pronounce  T.O.D @  10.34

Not yet, no mention of Nazi Germany or Hitler, give it time.

 

 

Edit:- Whoops,  I may have mentioned the war, but I think I got away with it.

Edited June 16, 20169 yr by ManDee

Religion , politics and Jack Watts.

44 minutes ago, ProDee said:

Nice little FYEO Bond reference. Love it. One of the darker moments of Roger's career.

Oh and Jack Watts derpy derp.