I find it hard to reply to people that are dishonest , you've had a dozen different accounts if you get banned from a forum you should just read it after that but instead you wait 6 weeks and come up with another ridiculous name, as far as I'm concerned Thats dishonest so don't reply to me.

Haha dishonest?

You like to make stupid accusations, but back it up with nought.

And every time one of your hindsight-laden revisions is called for what it is, you resort to weak excuses and run from accountability.

You can put me on ignore if you like, but I'll reply to who I want.

Oh no! We're taking it easy with players that have had interrupted preseasons so that we can get the best value out of them for the H&A. What the hell is the club thinking?

Oh no! We're taking it easy with players that have had interrupted preseasons so that we can get the best value out of them for the H&A. What the hell is the club thinking?

I think everyone understands why this is happening. It is only disappointment in not seeing a good side on the park in our first game of a new season, even though it is a NAB challenge game.

Can we make this purely a training report thread and not a chest beating and d!ck measuring thread... Every thread one persons opinion is roared down by another know it all demonlander... It is pathetic.

Can we make this purely a training report thread and not a chest beating and d!ck measuring thread... Every thread one persons opinion is roared down by another know it all demonlander... It is pathetic.

Often because (and we've all done it) training reports can be loaded with a persons crude assessment of a player instead of just descriptions of what they are seeing. From then on debate starts and its ok for a while but does get out of hand. As of Friday we will at least get games and stats to analyse instead of random observations.

So very true though sue, Debt Demolition was the worst thing to ever happen to this club, it sucked people in to believing the club was headed in the right direction when all it did was give certain people a bit longer to sit in a position that they wernt worthy of, people like yourself thinking the Debts paid Cameron and he's puppets are doing a great job, I'm starting to think it was the worst thing to ever happen to this club because in anything in life you need a plan b , not a red and blue print that was as real as our next major Chinese sponsor , people like you are concerned about chips contract when guys like Clark earning double the amount think about it , CS decisions have very very long ramifications .

Sigh... some of us are working on the present and future. We all feel a little bitter about the gross waste of time, money and inspiration that occurred through the previous administration.

But there's a difference between that and "Mitch Clark injured his foot = Cameron Schwab's ruining us".

Also, Frawley's decision will hinge as much on success as on money, I'm sure of that. We have vast piles of salary cap room anyway, so the amount we are paying both Clark and Dawes is not really going to be a factor in Frawley's decision. What will be a factor, as stated by him, quite clearly, is whether the club is looking like making real progress and becoming a proper professional team with real prospects.

Both Clark and Dawes can have a major hand in that - both are exceptionally professional presences and both capable of filling absolutely essential on-field roles.

Let's say both are fit by round 3, they may well define our season.