Jump to content

POLL: Do you want Mark Neeld to remain coach in 2013?

Range Rover
Range Rover
in Melbourne Demons

Mark Neeld in 2013? Yes or No. 467 members have voted

  1. 1. Should Mark Neeld continue on as coach into season 2013?

    • Yes
      398
    • No
      26

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Featured Replies

 
  On 30/07/2012 at 21:45, belzebub59 said:

How does that stop you from either wanting him there or not ? Are you not in effect saying he needs time to prove something ? You think that will/would or could happen in the short time left thi sseason.Almost by default yours is a vote for keeping.

What changes, weve a whole new FD ffs. Things take time.

I would be happy to vote for him if he had a genuine fighting chance. That is why I abstain. With the current incompetents running the club it wont make any difference if we sack him now or next year. He will go the way of Bailey, but a greater scapegoat if there ever was. Remove the baggage of the past though we may see his true talents.
 
  On 31/07/2012 at 09:08, america de cali said:

I would be happy to vote for him if he had a genuine fighting chance. That is why I abstain. With the current incompetents running the club it wont make any difference if we sack him now or next year. He will go the way of Bailey, but a greater scapegoat if there ever was. Remove the baggage of the past though we may see his true talents.

I dont quite understand . Why are those that are running the club incompetent ?

What are they doing that can be so described.

  On 31/07/2012 at 09:58, belzebub59 said:

I dont quite understand . Why are those that are running the club incompetent ?

What are they doing that can be so described.

can you not see what have they done?


With the result of this poll, it's turned out to be a very positive thread..........Thank the son of God!

  On 31/07/2012 at 10:21, america de cali said:

can you not see what have they done?

This is what I see...call me simple, naive, just not late for dinner

The club have created an infrastructure that might finally develop players that are capable of not only playing for 4 quarters on their feet but do so competitively. I see a club who managed some dire circumstances regarding sponsorships and came up with a pretty good plan B.

They have got on board coach(s) who will reinvent the team in the image of accountability and a playing style commensurate with the best currently playing. .

I see a club being honest in its evaluation of where we were, what was wrong and doing something about it.

What do you see America de Cali ?

  On 31/07/2012 at 02:55, tonatopia said:

The masses have spoken. I will shut up about it.

I hope the majority is correct, and we can achieve success.

However, I think a 3 year 'faith contract' is a bit rich. Time to re-assess midway thru 2013.

Go Dees.

Tonatopia

..don't let them bully you mate! Your points are all sound. Fact is we are stuck with Neeld for 2 more years. Neeld doubters even voted for Neeld like P_Man for example. Don't be afraid of challenging these guys! I didn't vote for ethical reasons and suspect others didn't. Yet another crazy poll by RRover.

Midway next year watch the numbers swing around. Sad thing is Neeld will destroy the current young crop and will take another 5 years to recover.
 
  On 31/07/2012 at 10:34, 1 red eye 1 blue eye said:

With the result of this poll, it's turned out to be a very positive thread..........Thank the son of God!

RRover likes this indeed!! It was his crazy poll! Range Razor Rover well done Son!!:)

  On 31/07/2012 at 05:37, stinga81 said:

120-4...I think we're done here.....

120 abstained!


  On 31/07/2012 at 11:11, thaipantsman said:

Tonatopia

..don't let them bully you mate! Your points are all sound. Fact is we are stuck with Neeld for 2 more years. Neeld doubters even voted for Neeld like P_Man for example. Don't be afraid of challenging these guys! I didn't vote for ethical reasons and suspect others didn't. Yet another crazy poll by RRover.

Midway next year watch the numbers swing around. Sad thing is Neeld will destroy the current young crop and will take another 5 years to recover.

Give him enough rope.

Still, let's see how we go against gc. They are still amatures. If we font beat them, we are in trouble. Especially with the blind faith around here. Really, this club is more like a cult.

  On 31/07/2012 at 11:10, belzebub59 said:

This is what I see...call me simple, naive, just not late for dinner

The club have created an infrastructure that might finally develop players that are capable of not only playing for 4 quarters on their feet but do so competitively. I see a club who managed some dire circumstances regarding sponsorships and came up with a pretty good plan B.

They have got on board coach(s) who will reinvent the team in the image of accountability and a playing style commensurate with the best currently playing. .

I see a club being honest in its evaluation of where we were, what was wrong and doing something about it.

What do you see America de Cali ?

I don't have to stick two fingers down my throat to purge myself.

  On 31/07/2012 at 12:08, america de cali said:

I don't have to stick two fingers down my throat to purge myself.

so you suggest theyre doing something you dont particularly care for but wont answer a question.

fair enough...your talking sh!t then

  On 31/07/2012 at 12:16, belzebub59 said:

so you suggest theyre doing something you dont particularly care for but wont answer a question.

fair enough...your talking sh!t then

I assure you, I don't need laxatives after reading your posts.

  • Author
  On 31/07/2012 at 12:08, america de cali said:

I don't have to stick two fingers down my throat to purge myself.

Why won't you answer the question ADC? It seems fair enough.


pull the fence down guys and you'll love each other!

  On 31/07/2012 at 12:20, america de cali said:

I assure you, I don't need laxatives after reading your posts.

classic answer...

Whats the matter adc. Faced with a question you go to jelly. Surely its not that hard to provide your willing audience you view.

So easy to throw rubbish around until you have to back it up.

You accuse the current board of incompetence. But cant come up with an single word to support your stance.

Put up or shut the f#^* up !!

  On 31/07/2012 at 12:21, Range Rover said:

Why won't you answer the question ADC? It seems fair enough.

The question requires no answer. Only needs open eyes and heads out of sand.

  On 31/07/2012 at 12:26, belzebub59 said:

classic answer...

Whats the matter adc. Faced with a question you go to jelly. Surely its not that hard to provide your willing audience you view.

So easy to throw rubbish around until you have to back it up.

You accuse the current board of incompetence. But cant come up with an single word to support your stance.

Put up or shut the f#^* up !!

Dream on. You will wake up soon.

  On 31/07/2012 at 11:26, tonatopia said:

Give him enough rope.

Still, let's see how we go against gc. They are still amatures. If we font beat them, we are in trouble. Especially with the blind faith around here. Really, this club is more like a cult.

Cults can be fun! don't take it too seriously Have fun with the RRovers of this world. As I said earlier he sees himself as a King Pin around here and doesn't like to be challenged. He's got a good heart and intentions :) I've actually warmed to him.


  • Author
  On 31/07/2012 at 12:28, america de cali said:

The question requires no answer. Only needs open eyes and heads out of sand.

That's very, very weak ADC.

  On 31/07/2012 at 12:34, Range Rover said:

That's very, very weak ADC.

Sorry, I am not around to grab your neck to pull it out of the sand and shake it. But eventually you will need to stretch​ yourself and then it may pop out.

  On 31/07/2012 at 12:26, belzebub59 said:

classic answer...

Whats the matter adc. Faced with a question you go to jelly. Surely its not that hard to provide your willing audience you view.

So easy to throw rubbish around until you have to back it up.

You accuse the current board of incompetence. But cant come up with an single word to support your stance.

Put up or shut the f#^* up !!

Belze settle down Matey! It's not a bad response. For example Range Rover's Signature makes me Projectile Vomit. I was pretty cool with Neeld a couple of months ago then that "Neeld" signature kept on jumping out at me. This is the same. I can help out re: the current board stuff ups....? Letting G LYon have any input appointing the last two Coaches. Bailey and Neeld. That's a good un for starters.

 

‘This is just the end of the beginning’.

Pretty poor voter turn-out, less than 5%! Apathy, the silent majority, or those who saw the trap?

I suspect the Club has bigger problems on its plate right now!

  • Author
  On 31/07/2012 at 12:47, Hardnut said:

‘This is just the end of the beginning’.

Pretty poor voter turn-out, less than 5%! Apathy, the silent majority, or those who saw the trap?

I suspect the Club has bigger problems on its plate right now!

175 - 5 for Neeld.

I'm a bit disappointed to be honest. Was hoping for 99% but only managed 97.22%.

Did you and Tona have two accounts each? Come on ... come clean.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

Featured Content

  • REPORT: Hawthorn

    There was a time during the current Melbourne cycle that goes back to before the premiership when the club was the toughest to beat in the fourth quarter. The Demons were not only hard to beat at any time but it was virtually impossible to get the better them when scores were close at three quarter time. It was only three or four years ago but they were fit, strong and resilient in body and mind. Sadly, those days are over. This has been the case since the club fell off its pedestal about 12 months ago after it beat Geelong and then lost to Carlton. In both instances, Melbourne put together strong, stirring final quarters, one that resulted in victory, the other, in defeat. Since then, the drop off has been dramatic to the point where it can neither pull off victory in close matches, nor can it even go down in defeat  gallantly.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 0 replies
    Demonland
    Demonland

  • CASEY: Footscray

    At twenty-four minutes into the third term of the game between the Casey Demons and Footscray VFL at Whitten Oval, the visitors were coasting. They were winning all over the ground, had the ascendancy in the ruck battles and held a 26 point lead on a day perfect for football. What could go wrong? Everything. The Bulldogs moved into overdrive in the last five minutes of the term and booted three straight goals to reduce the margin to a highly retrievable eight points at the last break. Bouyed by that effort, their confidence was on a high level during the interval and they ran all over the despondent Demons and kicked another five goals to lead by a comfortable margin of four goals deep into the final term before Paddy Cross kicked a couple of too late goals for a despondent Casey. A testament to their lack of pressure in the latter stages of the game was the fact that Footscray’s last ten scoring shots were nine goals and one rushed behind. Things might have been different for the Demons who went into the game after last week’s bye with 12 AFL listed players. Blake Howes was held over for the AFL game but two others, Jack Billings and Taj Woewodin (not officially listed as injured) were also missing and they could have been handy at the end. Another mystery of the current VFL system.

      • Thanks
    • 0 replies
    Demonland
    Demonland

  • PREGAME: Brisbane

    The Demons head back out on the road in Round 10 when they travel to Queensland to take on the reigning Premiers and the top of the table Lions who look very formidable. Can the Dees cause a massive upset? Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 85 replies
    Demonland
    Demonland

  • PODCAST: Hawthorn

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 12th May @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Demons loss to the Hawks. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 36 replies
    Demonland
    Demonland

  • POSTGAME: Hawthorn

    Wayward kicking for goal, dump kicks inside 50 and some baffling umpiring all contributed to the Dees not getting out to an an early lead that may have impacted the result. At the end of the day the Demons were just not good enough and let the Hawks run away with their first win against the Demons in 7 years.

      • Clap
      • Love
      • Like
    • 334 replies
    Demonland
    Demonland

  • VOTES: Hawthorn

    After 3 fantastic week Max Gawn has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award from Jake Bowey, Christian Petracca, Kade Chandler and Ed Langdon who round out the Top Five. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Thanks
    • 32 replies
    Demonland
    Demonland
View All