Jump to content

Outside the Box and from Left Field

Featured Replies

  • Author

what was the error

 

what was the error

Sadly, you don't know when you make them B59, and you will always turn agressive when someone pulls you up on something. Have a good day.

Yep, But before the top up players we need to chase Boak and/or Salopek, or other maturely built experienced players.

 
  • Author

Sadly, you don't know when you make them B59, and you will always turn agressive when someone pulls you up on something. Have a good day.

Cant answer a simple question can you Billy.. Again Billy..what was the errorr / Its not a hard question..and you raised it.. But now evade.. Well done

I dont pretend Im always right.. educate me

Cant answer a simple question can you Billy.. Again Billy..what was the errorr / Its not a hard question..and you raised it.. But now evade.. Well done

I dont pretend Im always right.. educate me

1. You shot down a poster in this thread giving you a list of names that were under your age requirement, then a different poster mentioned the name of a 22 year old, which you agreed met your criteria. Then when you were pulled up on it, the best you had was that next year he would be 23. Trying to use anything you can to make yourself look like the smart ass (as per normal).

2. Your initial posts on the Petter thread were totally incorrect. While this is an opinion thing to some degree, your constant ranting about Political Correctness is totally incorrect. Telling someone you are going to take their mother somewhere and rape them, doing this on 2 occasions, it in far from politically incorrect. What it is is out right disrespectful and has know place in society in general, let alone on a football field (which you seem to think is fair game).

3. Your constant opinion, an you're not on your own here, is regarding Mr Scully. You are certain that he is going to GWS, with absolutely no facts to back you up. In 6 weeks you may be right, but in the mean time, anything you say is complete rubbish (like most things on the Scully threads). When I asked you to come out with a simple Yes or No regarding him staying, you, which is typical, sat on the fence, trying to protect yourself just in case he stays.


  • Author

1. You shot down a poster in this thread giving you a list of names that were under your age requirement, then a different poster mentioned the name of a 22 year old, which you agreed met your criteria. Then when you were pulled up on it, the best you had was that next year he would be 23. Trying to use anything you can to make yourself look like the smart ass (as per normal).

2. Your initial posts on the Petter thread were totally incorrect. While this is an opinion thing to some degree, your constant ranting about Political Correctness is totally incorrect. Telling someone you are going to take their mother somewhere and rape them, doing this on 2 occasions, it in far from politically incorrect. What it is is out right disrespectful and has know place in society in general, let alone on a football field (which you seem to think is fair game).

3. Your constant opinion, an you're not on your own here, is regarding Mr Scully. You are certain that he is going to GWS, with absolutely no facts to back you up. In 6 weeks you may be right, but in the mean time, anything you say is complete rubbish (like most things on the Scully threads). When I asked you to come out with a simple Yes or No regarding him staying, you, which is typical, sat on the fence, trying to protect yourself just in case he stays.

1) My OP to this tthread commented upon the more mature or thereabouyts.. The names proffered except for one were under the age. That was the context. Do you get that ?? probably not. Mohr whilst curently 22 will actuall be 23 at or around the time of any drafting this year. So fall entirely within thecontext of the OP. That was entirely the premise of this thread, that maybe the club looked to a matured player, as he is.The others inth emain were players already at this club when younger..theres actuiallyu a point of difference. Probably a big hard for you to grasp.

2)You have your opinion aboutth Petterd incident.. others have a differing one. At no time did I suggest it was laudable only that there was no vilification of the type the mass hysteria ( you included bought into. There was however a nasty comment made and that is one which I would imagine McGinnity would be most sheepish about. You like many dont get subtle differences. Sledging is sledgiing. Possibly distasteful but he did not walk up to Petterd's mum and vilify her.

3) dont like my thoughts on Scully or such..well suck it up princess.. What many of us here have shown is that all is not quite as many would have it appear. When shown differing situations and comments that dont sit well with the "Boy said this..etc " brigade you and many get all shirty, invoking some yet unknown constraint that nothing but abject purity must emit from those put on pedastals. Others like to construct from overview.

enjoyed your lilttel rant Billy Boy ?

care to return to the subject of the thread?

if not..PM me.. PM who the %4# you like..

You know what we should do?

Look at the state leagues! Get some ready made players in their prime.

Oh, rpfc, you've done it again!

You know what we should do?

Look at the state leagues! Get some ready made players in their prime.

Oh, rpfc, you've done it again!

What a brilliant idea!! No club has ever thought of that. You should start a new thread on it.

 

2)You have your opinion aboutth Petterd incident.. others have a differing one. At no time did I suggest it was laudable only that there was no vilification of the type the mass hysteria ( you included bought into. There was however a nasty comment made and that is one which I would imagine McGinnity would be most sheepish about. You like many dont get subtle differences. Sledging is sledgiing. Possibly distasteful but he did not walk up to Petterd's mum and vilify her.

You dont understand the issue. *Cringe*

you know what ? I reckon there must be some untapped mature players out there in the SANFL, VFL & WAFL that have missed the drafts. we should check the QAFL, NSWAFL and NT while we are at it. Rookie them and bring them on...oh wait a second..


Tim Mohr - Casey Scorps

Age 22 195cm 98kgs Tall KP Defender. On the radar for GWS? and other Clubs. Very strong and had a very good year. Gotch rates him as the most improved player on the list.

I saw Mohr playing for Casey a couple of years ago and he looked pretty good, I wondered at the time why he wasn't on some club's list. IIRC he was playing in the ruck at the time and was a hard at it type.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: St. Kilda

    It's Game Day and there are only 5 games to go. Can the Demons find some consistency and form as they stagger towards the finish line of another uninspiring season?

      • Haha
    • 566 replies
  • PREVIEW: St. Kilda

    It seems like only yesterday that these two sides faced off against each other in the centre of the continent. It was when Melbourne was experiencing a rare period of success with five wins from its previous six matches including victories over both of last year’s grand finalists.  Well, it wasn’t yesterday but it was early last month and it remains etched clearly in the memory. The Saints were going through a slump and the predicted outcome of their encounter at TIO Traeger Park was a virtual no-brainer. A Melbourne victory and another step closer to a possible rise into finals contention. Something that was unthinkable after opening the season with five straight defeats.

    • 5 replies
  • REPORT: Carlton

    I am now certain that the decline in fortunes of the Melbourne Football Club from a premiership power with the potential for more success to come in the future, started when the team ran out for their Round 9 match up against Carlton last year. After knocking over the Cats in a fierce contest the week before, the Demons looked uninterested at the start of play and gave the Blues a six goal start. They recovered to almost snatch victory but lost narrowly with a score of 11.10.76 to 12.5.77. Yesterday, they revisited the scene and provided their fans with a similar display of ineptitude early in the proceedings. Their attitude at the start was poor, given that the game was so winnable. Unsurprisingly, the resulting score was almost identical to that of last year and for the fourth time in succession, the club has lost a game against Carlton despite having more scoring opportunities. 

    • 3 replies
  • CASEY: Carlton

    The Casey Demons smashed the Carlton Reserves off the park at Casey Fields on Sunday to retain a hold on an end of season wild card place. It was a comprehensive 108 point victory in which the home side was dominant and several of its players stood out but, in spite of the positivity of such a display, we need to place an asterisk over the outcome which saw a net 100 point advantage to the combined scores in the two contests between Demons and Blues over the weekend.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: St. Kilda

    The Demons come face to face with St. Kilda for the second time this season for their return clash at Marvel Stadium on Sunday. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 310 replies
  • PODCAST: Carlton

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Tuesday, 22nd July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to Carlton at the MCG.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

    • 40 replies