Jump to content

Earl Hood

Life Member
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. I get the feeling the MRP is on his case every match.
  2. 6 Gawn 5 Petracca 4 Bowey 3 Salem 2 Viney 1 Rivers
  3. Max then Kossie down to the rooms with 5 minutes to go? I hope that’s just a [censored] break!
  4. Earl Hood posted a post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Isn’t Nash 198cm tall? His arm was always going to connect high on Miers or any other player less than 193 cm tall. What was he trying to do as his arm swings like a windmill, it could really only end one way? I suppose the careless/intentional rating will always be challenged so the MRO goes for the defensible rating. Should get 4 to 5.
  5. I went to a Tom Hafey talk years ago and I think I remember him saying Sheedy had been knocked back after training with Melbourne, Norm Smith thought he was too small and too slow as a centre man. He then came to Richmond and he fitted Hafey’s model perfectly. Hafey was big on fitness and aggression, he spoke highly of how Sheedy set such high training standards. Not often Norm got things wrong like that.
  6. Earl Hood posted a post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Obvious holding the ball or throw from Hawks, play on, goes forward to Watson who grabs a bouncing ball and throws himself forward at Smith to get a high free. Really?
  7. I noticed he came off during the pregame warmup for treatment near the bench. I think it was an issue with his foot and boot. He only got back on the field just before the first bounce. He has had issues with skin infections on his foot. This could have had an impact on his form.
  8. 6 Kossie 5 Gawn 4 Bowey 3 Viney 2 TMac 1 Petty
  9. But who is seeing the real training sessions that only occur at Casey these days to be able to report? The training at Gosch’s is recovery or a Captains Run with soccer balls etc.
  10. Earl Hood posted a post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Well visually that comment does seem to be our forward strategy and a big part of our scoring problems, why ball carriers aren’t taking the shorter options and forwards aren’t leading.
  11. Earl Hood posted a post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    The umpiring has been average tonight. Mihocek has twice just grabbed a handball receive and immediately ducked to ground, hoping for high contact but then being tackled and no attempt to dispose of the footy, for a ball up. Holding the ball surely!
  12. Except the emergencies Fritsch, Howes, Henderson will need to be at the G?
  13. Earl Hood posted a post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    So true but are the ball carriers even being asked to lower the eyes, look for closer options inboard? I have watched on replays so many times, Viney and Oliver repeatedly just kick long and ignore handball options but at least they were often in traffic. The 3 examples the Hodge showed the ball carriers were clear, with time and space, yet ignored unmarked players inboard and kicked directly toward their ā€œstationaryā€ forward targets. It is just mind boggling that it hasn’t been hammered into the players to look for the short option. And replay after replay shows the forwards just retreating from the ball carrier, no one leading at the ball carrier or into space to run onto a pass. The coaches and players must be running this vision after every loss yet nothing changes in F50. I just can not understand what is going on. It looks like a simple solution to at least get us back competing and scoring more than 60 pts a match. In 4 out of 5 matches we have somehow won the inside 50 count but barely managed a 20% scoring efficiency! Oh and we are 18th for set shot goal kicking accuracy! Lord give me strength!
  14. Earl Hood posted a post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Freo has flogged us in every game for the last 3 years through constant ball movement and running in numbers. I would be happy for a competitive game and signs we have learnt to negate their strengths. Not optimistic though.
  15. Earl Hood posted a post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Seeing Luke Hodge’s brief but scathing analysis on Agenda Setters of our forward play against Essendon just does my head in. It was admittedly, a small sample size of vision from behind the goals of our F50 entries. Examples of midfielders getting the ball at 70m, in space but just booting to an out numbered forward, ignoring running players clear in the corridor or forwards not leading to space to provide a target. As Hodge said this is under 12’s stuff and it’s not AFL standard but it’s been the same for 4 years! You would see better forward strategy (if not execution) at your local suburban ground with part time players and coach. Meanwhile Simon seems to talking about our need to improve our defending to stifle the opposition’s ball movement, which is very difficult to do against sides moving the ball as quickly and precisely as Brisbane, Collingwood, Hawthorn and (no doubt we will find out this week) Freo, especially if you are not scoring.