red&blue1982

So many pessimistic loser posts.

Another throw by Geelong not called!

We're mostly playing well, but get screwed over by the umps!

What a joke of a 'holding the ball' call!

Viney like a bullet!

Bad patch of umpiring decisions!

Authoritarian statement above. 'we are all trying to fix', who is 'we', and what are you 'trying to fix'? Are you another champion of 'anti racism'? The vast majority of people are anti racism, and are anti racist's who oppose racism without virtue signalling the fact. There is still racism is our society, and I imagine in almost all societies of the world. We should strive for equality together. So many sanctimonious posts on Demonland lately like 'we need to be more then anti racist'. Racism is a human frailty that hysterical keyboard behaviour, or actions isn't going to solve.

I'm not interested in what you 'suspect'. You're quite arrogant to assume authority on the matter, and pre judge. Asking if anyone knew what was said is called gathering information. Obviously Walker said something racist. I don't need you to state what's plainly obvious, and keep your history lessons to yourself, there boring. Anyway, he'll get punished.

Geez, you're going to a lot of effort to withhold information. Suit yourself. My curiosity is losing interest. I didn't realise the discussion was going to be so gaurded.

It's poignant. It's information. It reveals more about his character, it reveals more about the story. Simple.

It's a discussion isn't it? We're all communicating in text on a forum right? I'm noticing that through merely inquiring about what Tex Walker actually said it's raising suspicion and censor like responses like yours. Why discuss the story at all if you don't want to go into detail?

Such blatant assuming behaviour you have, and you're claiming the moral high ground? You have no idea who I am, or where I come from

What a pathetic attempt at righteousness. If you were truely interested in resolution in these issues, you wouldn't try and shut down discussion.

What a pathetic attempt at righteousness. If you were truely interested in resolution in these issues, you wouldn't try and shut down discussion.

If you want to illuminate the issue you discuss it. A journalist usually publicises the information in question.

I'm trying to find out as well. No one seems to have quoted his comments. Has it been publicised?

Go further, not sure what your implying? I agree with some of your points, although your language is confusing me. No intended insult, just explaining myself. But I don't agree with you assuming you know what 'White aussies' and 'indigenous people' did, or thought so long ago. Yes happenings from the past can be understood to a minimal degree of uncertainty, but writing like you know how and why things were back then is careless.

I think I get your first statement, double standards yeah? If so, I agreed that hypocrisy is usually noticible in conversations about prejudice. I don't understand what your second statement means?

'guts' is debatable. You could just as easily say it was an advantageous political statement. But I agree you should judge people on there actions, not there age or appearance.

A 20 point win would be adequate. This was substantial.

You say that like it's factual.

Ease up, he's out of form. He'll come good again.

Great win boys!

Nicely weighted kick by Baylee.

Clarry!