CBDees

Oliver didn’t even poll in the media! An absolute disgrace!

I’ll enjoy it even more if the Dockers beat Collingwood (propelling us into fourth place)!

Hannan is exciting to watch when he is on song!

I am going to remain an optimist and will relish the Dockers getting up to demolish the Pies next weekend, propelling us into Fourth position if we can overcome the Giants!

We could still be Top Four if The Dockers somehow manage to beat Collingwood. If that happens (and naturally we win) then we will move to fourth (as we will have removed the two-point advantage of GWS). Of the teams a game clear of us, either the Swans or Hawks will find find themselves on the same number of points and a lesser percentage, given that they they play each other and the loser will remain on a lower percentage. Top Four will mean that week one of the Finals will see us playing the Tigers at the “G” and a massive game. If we win we return to the “G” for Week Three: if we lose we also return to the “G” for Week Two (whilst the winners from the bottom half travel to either Perth or Sydney for Week Two or the Hawks at “G”), It is all up to the Dockers!

6. Gawn 5. melksham 4. Harmes e. brayshawb/Oliver 2. Jones 1. Weidman/T. Mac

Shame the Crows, Lions and Port didn’t get up yesterday (especially as they were all in it at one stage)! It would have been nice to see the Giants, Pies and Eagles all go down! ?

Disappointed about Smith as (up until he got injured) that was his best game all year. He was applying plenty of pressure and Goodwin’s perseverance was playing off! In no way are him and Pedo like-for-like swaps!

You have to be concerned with ‘winning margin’ as this game is the only chance we have to increase our percentage. Although we currently have a healthy percentage (second highest), the teams around us are closing the gap and, at the end of the season, it may well prove the difference in finishing Top Four or even scraping into the Final Eight!

Was nobody worth 5 votes?

Why would you have us losing to West Coast? North today should that they are not any better than us! At least we have North’s measure in Tassie!?

I’ve booked a holiday for the first week of Finals so I need us to finish Top Four (so as to get a second chance) so I can enjoy watching us play on the The Second (or Third) week of the Finals! Go Dees! (Premiers 2018)

6. Oliver 5. Nibbler 4. Gawn 3. Frost 2. T. Mac 1. Petracca apologies to Brayshaw, Harmes, Lewis, Garlett, Milkshake, Fritsh also for the 95% of Demonlanders who wanted to drop JKH, I thought he deserved his spot!

If we total the VFL and the AFL final scores together, we actually beat Geelong by one point! ?

I just got a recording when I tuned in.

Is anybody broadcasting it? I an not expecting Casey Radio to be loaned a broadcast box but is there any Geelong station covering the match (however biased)!

><)))^> Booked to go fishing. Returning Second Week of the Finals (and expect us to be there)! <^)))><

Good margin. The AFL website predicts Geelong by 8 points (however I am travelling down the Geelong Road in anticipation of the Dees prevailing)! Dees by 8 points!

If he plays four quarters today and at the level of intensity of last week, I would love to see Vanders in for the run home!

We’ve had a few results in our favour so far this weekend, not only our come-from-behind win, but Geelong, Richmond and Hawthorn’s losses and seeing Essendon being pushed by the Suns. If North can slog out a win against Sydney and West Coast bring Collingwood back to earth, our quest for Top Four may not be a pipe dream. Icing on the cake if Freo cause an upset against Port. Our destiny is in our hands but yesterday’s Third Quarter has renewed my faith that we can do it!

Up until last week, we had a chance of picking up a few St Kilda supporters as well! Little hope of that now! ?

Your spelling is a tragedy in itself! Haven’t you got spell-check?

No I suspect that you have it right (judging from Google Maps) and there is an adjacent play area as well. Obviously the MFC proposal would have to limit itself to the railway land (which may involve a 99year lease or purchase?) as apportioning/alienating ‘public land’ would be a step too far. Perhaps the Club is planning administrative functions on the lower levels (with a pleasant view of the trees) allowing the ‘Members Bar’ an elevated view of the training ground at a similar level to Level 2 at the “G”! I am sure that the building design will cater for staff, players and members when they consider orientation (e.g. player’s facilities don’t need a view as there will only be dog-walkers there when they are not training)!

I think that this is the objective of the plan, players facility right next to the ground and a MFC Member’s Bar/Lounge overlooking the training ground.