Lucifers Hero

Agreed. We seemed to centralise the ball in our fwd 50 a lot more in the second half of the year and go much deeper into the fwd 50. Not sure what was happening with the tap downs in our defensive half last week. We would usually go for the OOB but against GCS they didn't appear to want that and chose to tap down to a player directly in front. Maybe they were experimenting. To me it didn't look effective as it often resulted in a turnover. Would prefer the OOB option or tap down to our own player...

Ben. He was competing for marks with other dees in our fwd 50.

They are infatuated with their 'Baby Bombers' label and its a handy excuse when things go wrong.

I wouldn't mind if Max, TMac and Brown didn't compete for the same mark as they often did vs GCS. Also, Max and Jackson were regularly doing two-handed tap downs instead of marking only for the ball to go straight to a GCS player who spun around and went fwd. This was often in our def half; a dangerous spot for a turnover. No idea where our mids were. Overall not sure the communications were up to scratch last week. Changing the above by our talls will reduce the turnovers, help us keep control and get more direct shots for goal.

Thanks DIO. Not much advantage for us then. Maybe the Home crowd will get our dees over the line. And 🤞Freo do the Crows.

Oops! Missed the key word!

Agreed. Being The Hunted, many clubs will see their game vs the dees as their GF so will be capable of anything on the day. Coaches will plan more intently than usual and gee up their players to 'take on the best'. Last year it was the lower teams that got us and with they added 'this is our chance to shine' incentive, they can get us again.

If it is we can give a recruiter's job based in WA 😃

He did, in round 1. It was awesome how the team got around him.

Ralph is assuming we have sal cap issues. He may be right. But it won't stop us signing Jackson (and Oliver) and I would guess they would follow the lead set by others and be reasonable. The club will contract other players in order of priority. If need be they won't renew contracts for Hibberd, Melksham and others. And maybe trade out a few: Harmes (2yrs to go on contract), Hunt ☹️(OOC this year) etc. Some players may go for lack of opportunity. The club would have planned for this several years ago. Hope that is reassuring.

Agreed the coach that gave him 1 vote, short changed him. I wonder if it was Drew, if he thought Miller didn't fulfill his role as required? I guess we will never know.

It had to be him. He excelled. No other contenders even came close. As i mentioned earlier today, continue like this and he can't be ignored at the end of the year to be The 2022 Rising Star. Jackson won it in his second year so not impossible. @DemonlandCan we change the title to show RS #2?

We won two finals before crashing out in the Ptelim; they crashed out immediately. It will take them much longer than it took us to make a GF let alone win it.

Correct 2020. Lost track of time. No biggy re the subsequent complimentary point that was being made. I'll edit it so no one else is tempted to post it was 2020.

Guess at Coaches split: 5/5 Petracca 3/3 Jackson 4/1 Bowey and Miller 2/2 Oliver The rankings look correct but the differing views of Bowey and Miller are a bit of a surprise.

Well! That's the last time I do a 'What they are saying...' thread. 😉

I doubt anyone will be watching the meaningless SA Derby which is on Foxtel not FTA.

He was standing up🙂

It wasn't unreasonable to doubt his value to the team, after all he was asked to look for opportunities elsewhere at end of 2019 2020. To his enormous credit he turned his game around and now there is no doubt about his value to the team. Received a contract extension and is now, one of the first picked.

He is smiling. He will re-sign.😉

The pessimism isn't my editing. From 'Bomberblitz': I think the Dees will be a bit flat coming back from the GC on a six day break. If we bring today’s effort, we should give a good account for ourselves, but the Demons will do enough and win by 3-4 goals We haven’t been 0-3 since 1967 we are going to get completely obliterated no matter who we put on the park. heppell on fritsch is the stuff of nightmares For gods sake, can someone please just start a COVID outbreak at the hanger so 38 players are in health and safety protocols and the AFL call the game off? Going to be brutal. Oliver and Petracca are going to get 50 touches each and Brown will kick 10. merrett out only takes the margin from 60 to 80 points Who cares whos in…we have a bottom six that should be in the vfl but are playing so…Dees will smash us. With our unbelievable decision that we are so good we don’t need to use taggers, Petracca must be really looking forward to this week’s game. His main concern would be leather poisoning. ANNOUNCE HS PROTOCOLS FOR MELBOURNES BEST 22. The most hopeful comments: I think the Dees will be a bit flat coming back from the GC on a six day break. If we bring today’s effort, we should give a good account for ourselves, but the Demons will do enough and win by 3-4 goals. We’ll see. We beat them in a great Friday night game at the MCG in 2019. Lost narrowly in a dead rubber game for both clubs (at Metricon) in 2020 and then pressed them deep into the last quarter in our game last year before eventually going down by 11 points. Some questionable decisions also went their way in the second half. We know they’re a terrific team but I don’t think we are going to be overawed. From 'Bigfooty': Just want to see us be competitive and have someone run with Petracca. Cant believe Truck's comments about not tagging Neale. Horror draw to start the season but doesn't seem we were ready for the season anyway. There's a real stench about the team, which to me, has come out of nowhere given how positive last season was. Old habits are back, unfortunately. This will be a big loss and will effectively kill off the season It’s the stench of having sky high expectations, the second most difficult fixture in the league, and a team full of babies expected to pull off a miracle. I think we’ll go okay this week. I kind of hope shiel is out for another week so we get to see a pure midfield game from caldwell. If lever doesn’t play again this week the game will be a lot closer than many predict. I'm not all doom and gloom like it seems so many others are here, we're still a very inexperienced team who only beat one top 8 team last year, playing Geelong, Brisbane and Melbourne to start the year is no free ride even though the effort in Round 1 was poor. Like it's been mentioned already we won several key areas on the weekend so if we bring a similar output and convert a bit better there's no reason we can't compete and finish within 5 goals. To their credit I didn't see any disrespect. Probably just grudging respect. A bit of humour here and there was refereshing.

There has been a few well deserved articles today about his game. He won Fox's Golden Fist award this week. That is a mickey mouse fun thing but still good recognition. Collectively, they add up to having his name in the RS conversation. I can't think of any eligible player who played better this week so he has to be the nominee. Keep going at this rate and it will be tough to overlook him, despite the glamour boys being hailed as young stars.

Free tickets available today: AFLW Members, 2:00pm (local) | General Public 4:00pm (local). I also would have preferred Casey as it is our fortress. Casey is an MCG sized ground. Anyone know how The Gabba size compares to the MCG?

Luckily he just signed on for a few more years until 2024!

Some players took heavy knocks (Brayshaw, Petracca, Gawn, Bowey and Rivers) so it is understandable they would slow down, make mistakes or 'looked gassed'. I can't agree the decision to defend was to conserve energy for next week as it would be more fatiguing to do all the defensive things than to attack. Tackling, chasing, stoppages and all the 1% require a fair amount of physicality. We could have simply slowed the game down, played tempo footy and done less energetic attacking if the goal was to conserve engergy. And we used only 72 or our allowed 75 interchanges. Why leave them on the table if some players were 'gassed'? If anything, it looked like we were adopting the Burgess principle of 'building physical resilience'. After all we had played only one game in 6 months and that was 10 days earlier so probably needed the workout. We will never know the reason Goodwin responded as he did but I'm still of the view that he was fair dinkum and the more likely reason is that the last quarter 'defend' was to test and refine an end of game tactic. He could have simply said that our 5 pts in the last was inefficiency in front of goal. Btw, Ess will also be on a 6 day break and it was quite warm here on Saturday afternoon albeit without the high humidity, they did a mountain of running and had injuries to Cox and Merrett. We knew all that going into our game. I'm not sure our coaches and fitness folk were too fussed about facing an emotionally and physically battered and bruised team next week.